Michael Christ1,2, Felicitas Geier1, Sabine Blaschke3, Evangelos Giannitsis4, Mehdi Khellaf5, Johannes Mair6, David Pariente7, Volkher Scharnhorst8, Veronique Semjonow9, Pierre Hausfater7,10. 1. Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuernberg General Hospital, Nuernberg, Germany. 2. Department of Emergency, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland. 3. Interdisciplinary Emergency Care Unit, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. 4. Medizinische Klinik III, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 5. Emergency Department, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France. 6. Department of Internal Medicine III - Cardiology and Angiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria. 7. Emergency Department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France. 8. Clinical Laboratory, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven and Technical University Eindhoven, Eindhoven, TheNetherlands. 9. Philips Handheld Diagnostics, Eindhoven, TheNetherlands. 10. Sorbonne Universités UPMC Univ-Paris 06, GRC-UPMC BIOSFAST, Paris, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the clinical performance of the Minicare cardiac troponin-I (cTnI), a new point-of-care (POC) cTnI test for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in a prospective, multicentre study (ISRCTN77371338). METHODS: Of 474 patients (≥18 years) admitted to an emergency department (ED) or chest pain unit (CPU) with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS; ≤12 h from symptom onset), 465 were eligible. Minicare cTnI was tested immediately, 3 h and 6 h after presentation. AMI diagnoses were adjudicated independently based on current guidelines. RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of the Minicare cTnI test at 3 h was similar for whole blood and in plasma: sensitivity 0.92 vs. 0.90; specificity 0.91 vs. 0.90; positive predictive value (PPV) 0.68 vs. 0.66; negative predictive value (NPV) 0.98 vs. 0.98; positive likelihood ratio (LR+) 10.18 vs. 9.41; negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 0.09 vs. 0.11. The optimal diagnostic performance was obtained at 3 h using cut-offs cTnI >43 ng/L plus cTnI change from admission ≥18.5 ng/L: sensitivity 0.90, specificity 0.96, PPV 0.81, NPV 0.98, and LR+ 21.54. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for cTnI whole blood baseline value and absolute change after 3 h curve was 0.93. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the clinical usefulness of Minicare cTnI within a 0 h/3 h-blood sampling protocol supported by current guidelines for the evaluation of suspected ACS.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the clinical performance of the Minicare cardiac troponin-I (cTnI), a new point-of-care (POC) cTnI test for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in a prospective, multicentre study (ISRCTN77371338). METHODS: Of 474 patients (≥18 years) admitted to an emergency department (ED) or chest pain unit (CPU) with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS; ≤12 h from symptom onset), 465 were eligible. Minicare cTnI was tested immediately, 3 h and 6 h after presentation. AMI diagnoses were adjudicated independently based on current guidelines. RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of the Minicare cTnI test at 3 h was similar for whole blood and in plasma: sensitivity 0.92 vs. 0.90; specificity 0.91 vs. 0.90; positive predictive value (PPV) 0.68 vs. 0.66; negative predictive value (NPV) 0.98 vs. 0.98; positive likelihood ratio (LR+) 10.18 vs. 9.41; negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 0.09 vs. 0.11. The optimal diagnostic performance was obtained at 3 h using cut-offs cTnI >43 ng/L plus cTnI change from admission ≥18.5 ng/L: sensitivity 0.90, specificity 0.96, PPV 0.81, NPV 0.98, and LR+ 21.54. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for cTnI whole blood baseline value and absolute change after 3 h curve was 0.93. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the clinical usefulness of Minicare cTnI within a 0 h/3 h-blood sampling protocol supported by current guidelines for the evaluation of suspected ACS.