Literature DB >> 29630484

Effect of Different Adhesive Systems Used for Immediate Dentin Sealing on Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement to Dentin.

R C Ferreira-Filho, C Ely, R C Amaral, J A Rodrigues, J-F Roulet, A Cassoni, A F Reis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate and three-month water storage behavior of adhesives when used for immediate dentin sealing (IDS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four adhesive systems were used to perform IDS: a one-step self-etch (Xeno V), a two-step self-etch (Clearfil SE Bond), a two-step etch-and-rinse (XP Bond), and a three-step etch-and-rinse (Optibond FL). For the control group, IDS was not performed. The self-adhesive resin cement RelyX Unicem was used for the luting procedures. After seven days of water storage, specimens (n=6) were sectioned into beams (n=5) with an approximately 1-mm2 cross-sectional area. Half of the specimens were tested in tension after seven days of water storage at 37°C, while the other half was stored for three months prior to testing in tension using a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). The failure pattern was determined using a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy. Microtensile bond strength (μTBS) data were statistically analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test (α=0.05).
RESULTS: After seven days, the control group presented the lowest μTBS but did not differ from XP Bond and Clearfil SE Bond. After three months, there was no μTBS difference between the IDS groups and the control.
CONCLUSIONS: After seven days of water storage, the groups with IDS presented higher μTBS values than the control group, although XP Bond and Clearfil SE Bond did not present significant differences. However, after three months of storage in water, IDS groups did not differ significantly from control group, which did not receive IDS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29630484     DOI: 10.2341/17-023-L

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  6 in total

Review 1.  Adhesive Systems Used in Indirect Restorations Cementation: Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Cristian Abad-Coronel; Belén Naranjo; Pamela Valdiviezo
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-01

2.  Effect of Two Immediate Dentin Sealing Approaches on Bond Strength of Lava™ CAD/CAM Indirect Restoration.

Authors:  Hassan Faez Abdullah Gailani; Cristina Benavides-Reyes; María Victoria Bolaños-Carmona; Eva Rosel-Gallardo; Purificación González-Villafranca; Santiago González-López
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Effect of proanthocyanidin mediated immediate and delayed dentin sealing on the strength of premolars restored with composite resin inlay.

Authors:  Fereshteh Shafiei; Tayebeh Aghaei; Zahra Jowkar
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-03-01

4.  Avoidance of Interaction between Impression Materials and Tooth Surface Treated for Immediate Dentin Sealing: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Bruna Sinjari; Gianmaria D'Addazio; Giovanna Murmura; Giorgio Di Vincenzo; Mario Semenza; Sergio Caputi; Tonino Traini
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  Immediate Dentin Sealing for Adhesive Cementation of Indirect Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Louis Hardan; Walter Devoto; Rim Bourgi; Carlos Enrique Cuevas-Suárez; Monika Lukomska-Szymanska; Miguel Ángel Fernández-Barrera; Elizabeth Cornejo-Ríos; Paulo Monteiro; Maciej Zarow; Natalia Jakubowicz; Davide Mancino; Youssef Haikel; Naji Kharouf
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-03-11

Review 6.  Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Theodora-Kalliopi Samartzi; Dimokritos Papalexopoulos; Aspasia Sarafianou; Stefanos Kourtis
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2021-06-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.