Literature DB >> 29630060

Systematic Assessment of Well-Being in Mice for Procedures Using General Anesthesia.

Katharina Hohlbaum1, Bettina Bert2, Silke Dietze3, Rupert Palme4, Heidrun Fink3, Christa Thöne-Reineke5.   

Abstract

In keeping with the 3R Principle (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) developed by Russel and Burch, scientific research should use alternatives to animal experimentation whenever possible. When there is no alternative to animal experimentation, the total number of laboratory animals used should be the minimum needed to obtain valuable data. Moreover, appropriate refinement measures should be applied to minimize pain, suffering, and distress accompanying the experimental procedure. The categories used to classify the degree of pain, suffering, and distress are non-recovery, mild, moderate, or severe (EU Directive 2010/63). To determine which categories apply in individual cases, it is crucial to use scientifically sound tools. The well-being-assessment protocol presented here is designed for procedures during which general anesthesia is used. The protocol focuses on home cage activity, the Mouse Grimace Scale, and luxury behaviors such as burrowing and nest building behavior as indicators of well-being. It also uses the free exploratory paradigm for trait anxiety-related behavior. Fecal corticosterone metabolites as indicators of acute stress are measured over the 24-h post-anesthetic period. The protocol provides scientifically solid information on the well-being of mice following general anesthesia. Due to its simplicity, the protocol can easily be adapted and integrated in a planned study. Although it does not provide a scale to classify distress in categories according to the EU Directive 2010/63, it can help researchers estimate the degree of severity of a procedure using scientifically sound data. It provides a way to improve the assessment of well-being in a scientific, animal-centered manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29630060      PMCID: PMC5933230          DOI: 10.3791/57046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  34 in total

1.  Hippocampal scrapie infection impairs operant DRL performance in mice.

Authors:  Robert M J Deacon; Daniel Reisel; V Hugh Perry; J Nicholas; P Rawlins
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Subchronic memantine administration on spatial learning, exploratory activity, and nest-building in an APP/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Mohammed Filali; Robert Lalonde; Serge Rivest
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 3.  What the literature tells us about score sheet design.

Authors:  Philippe Bugnon; Maike Heimann; Michaela Thallmair
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  Guidelines on the recognition of pain, distress and discomfort in experimental animals and an hypothesis for assessment.

Authors:  D B Morton; P H Griffiths
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1985-04-20       Impact factor: 2.695

5.  Hippocampal cytotoxic lesion effects on species-typical behaviours in mice.

Authors:  Robert M J Deacon; Adam Croucher; J Nicholas P Rawlins
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Evaluation of cage leaving behaviour in rats as a free choice paradigm.

Authors:  B Bert; N Schmidt; J P Voigt; H Fink; A Rex
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.950

7.  Characterization of Train-Induced Vibration and its Effect on Fecal Corticosterone Metabolites in Mice.

Authors:  Nicholas A Atanasov; Jennifer L Sargent; John P Parmigiani; Rupert Palme; Helen E Diggs
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  Assessment of postsurgical distress and pain in laboratory mice by nest complexity scoring.

Authors:  Paulin Jirkof; Thea Fleischmann; Nikola Cesarovic; Andreas Rettich; Johannes Vogel; Margarete Arras
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.471

9.  Assessing burrowing, nest construction, and hoarding in mice.

Authors:  Robert Deacon
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Severity classification of repeated isoflurane anesthesia in C57BL/6JRj mice-Assessing the degree of distress.

Authors:  Katharina Hohlbaum; Bettina Bert; Silke Dietze; Rupert Palme; Heidrun Fink; Christa Thöne-Reineke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  Effects of separated pair housing of female C57BL/6JRj mice on well-being.

Authors:  K Hohlbaum; R Merle; S Frahm; A Rex; R Palme; C Thöne-Reineke; K Ullmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Impact of repeated anesthesia with ketamine and xylazine on the well-being of C57BL/6JRj mice.

Authors:  Katharina Hohlbaum; Bettina Bert; Silke Dietze; Rupert Palme; Heidrun Fink; Christa Thöne-Reineke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A novel multi-parametric analysis of non-invasive methods to assess animal distress during chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdelrahman; Simone Kumstel; Xianbin Zhang; Marie Liebig; Edgar Heinz Uwe Wendt; Johanna Eichberg; Rupert Palme; Thomas Thum; Brigitte Vollmar; Dietmar Zechner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Assessing Affective State in Laboratory Rodents to Promote Animal Welfare-What Is the Progress in Applied Refinement Research?

Authors:  Paulin Jirkof; Juliane Rudeck; Lars Lewejohann
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  The impact of tethered recording techniques on activity and sleep patterns in rats.

Authors:  Katharina Aulehner; Jack Bray; Ines Koska; Claudia Pace; Rupert Palme; Matthias Kreuzer; Bettina Platt; Thomas Fenzl; Heidrun Potschka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  The IntelliCage System: A Review of Its Utility as a Novel Behavioral Platform for a Rodent Model of Substance Use Disorder.

Authors:  Ismail Nurul Iman; Nurul Aiman Mohd Yusof; Ummi Nasrah Talib; Nur Aimi Zawami Ahmad; Anwar Norazit; Jaya Kumar; Muhammad Zulfadli Mehat; Nanthini Jayabalan; Sangu Muthuraju; Marzena Stefaniuk; Leszek Kaczmarek; Mustapha Muzaimi
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Towards a fully automated surveillance of well-being status in laboratory mice using deep learning: Starting with facial expression analysis.

Authors:  Niek Andresen; Manuel Wöllhaf; Katharina Hohlbaum; Lars Lewejohann; Olaf Hellwich; Christa Thöne-Reineke; Vitaly Belik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Measurement of Fecal Testosterone Metabolites in Mice: Replacement of Invasive Techniques.

Authors:  Kerstin E Auer; Marius Kußmaul; Erich Möstl; Katharina Hohlbaum; Thomas Rülicke; Rupert Palme
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-18       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  The impact of handling technique and handling frequency on laboratory mouse welfare is sex-specific.

Authors:  Federica Sensini; Dragos Inta; Rupert Palme; Christiane Brandwein; Natascha Pfeiffer; Marco Andrea Riva; Peter Gass; Anne Stephanie Mallien
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Reliability of the Mouse Grimace Scale in C57BL/6JRj Mice.

Authors:  Katharina Hohlbaum; Giuliano Mario Corte; Melanie Humpenöder; Roswitha Merle; Christa Thöne-Reineke
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.