Literature DB >> 29630008

Ovarian Cancer Prevention and Screening.

Usha Menon1, Chloe Karpinskyj, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj.   

Abstract

There has been much progress in ovarian cancer screening and prevention in recent years. Improved tools that combine genetic and epidemiologic factors to predict an individual's ovarian cancer risk are set to become available for tailoring preventive and screening approaches. The increasing evidence on tubal origins of a proportion of ovarian cancer has paved the way to use of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy at tubal ligation and hysterectomy in the general population. Clinical trials are in progress to estimate the long-term effects on endocrine function. In women at high risk, risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy remains the standard of care with the current focus on management of resulting noncancer outcomes, especially sexual dysfunction in younger women. This has led to evaluation of early bilateral salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy in this population. Meanwhile, modeling suggests that BRCA mutation carriers should consider using the oral contraceptive pill for chemoprevention. In the general population, the largest ovarian cancer screening trial to date, the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening reported a stage shift with annual multimodal screening using the longitudinal CA 125 Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm but not with annual transvaginal ultrasound screening. There was no definitive mortality reduction with either screening strategy compared with no screening. Further follow-up until December 2018 in now underway. Stage shift and higher rates of optimal cytoreduction were also reported during 3- to 4-monthly multimodal screening in the United Kingdom and U.S. high-risk screening trials. Although all agree that there is not yet evidence to support general population screening, recommendations for high-risk screening vary between countries. A key finding from the screening trials has been the better performance of longitudinal algorithms compared with a single cutoff for CA 125. A major focus of ovarian cancer biomarker discovery work has been tumor DNA markers in both plasma and novel specimens such as cervical cytology samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29630008     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  54 in total

Review 1.  Pre-treatment sarcopenic assessments as a prognostic factor for gynaecology cancer outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E H Sutton; M Plyta; K Fragkos; S Di Caro
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  The Anterior GRadient (AGR) family proteins in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Delphine Fessart; Jacques Robert; Cecile Hartog; Eric Chevet; Frederic Delom; Guillaume Babin
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-08-27

3.  Prognostic value of preoperative soluble interleukin 2 receptor α as a novel immune biomarker in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Hui Li; Miaofang Wu; Zhuna Wu; Jinxiao Liang; Lijuan Wang; Xi Yang; Zhongqiu Lin; Jing Li
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 6.968

4.  Comparison of Longitudinal CA125 Algorithms as a First-Line Screen for Ovarian Cancer in the General Population.

Authors:  Oleg Blyuss; Matthew Burnell; Andy Ryan; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Inés P Mariño; Jatinderpal Kalsi; Ranjit Manchanda; John F Timms; Mahesh Parmar; Steven J Skates; Ian Jacobs; Alexey Zaikin; Usha Menon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  LAMA3 DNA methylation and transcriptome changes associated with chemotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Li-Yuan Feng; Yong-Zhi Huang; Wei Zhang; Li Li
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.234

Review 6.  Mechanisms of High-Grade Serous Carcinogenesis in the Fallopian Tube and Ovary: Current Hypotheses, Etiologic Factors, and Molecular Alterations.

Authors:  Isao Otsuka
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  O-RADS MRI Risk Stratification System: Guide for Assessing Adnexal Lesions from the ACR O-RADS Committee.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sadowski; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Andrea Rockall; Katherine E Maturen; Rosemarie Forstner; Priyanka Jha; Stephanie Nougaret; Evan S Siegelman; Caroline Reinhold
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Understanding and addressing barriers to successful adenovirus-based virotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Rebeca Gonzalez-Pastor; Peter S Goedegebuure; David T Curiel
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 5.987

9.  The LINC00922 aggravates ovarian cancer progression via sponging miR-361-3p.

Authors:  Liping Wang; Chenchen Ren; Yajuan Xu; Li Yang; Yannan Chen; Yuanhang Zhu
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.234

10.  LINC00115 promotes stemness and inhibits apoptosis of ovarian cancer stem cells by upregulating SOX9 and inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway through competitively binding to microRNA-30a.

Authors:  Rui Hou; Luo Jiang
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 5.722

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.