Bingzhao Li1, Kwang Lee, Sotiris C Masmanidis, Mo Li. 1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States of America.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The convergence of optogenetic and large-scale neural recording technologies opens enormous opportunities for studying brain function. However, compared to the widespread use of optogenetics or recordings as standalone methods, the joint use of these techniques in behaving animals is much less well developed. A simple but poorly scalable solution has been to implant conventional optical fibers together with extracellular microelectrodes. A more promising approach has been to combine microfabricated light emission sources with multielectrode arrays. However, a challenge remains in how to compactly and scalably integrate optical output and electronic readout structures on the same device. Here we took a step toward addressing this issue by using nanofabrication techniques to develop a novel implantable optoelectronic probe. APPROACH: This device contains multiple photonic grating couplers connected with waveguides for out-of-plane light emission, monolithically integrated with a microlectrode array on the same silicon substrate. To demonstrate the device's operation in vivo, we record cortical activity from awake head-restrained mice. MAIN RESULTS: We first characterize photo-stimulation effects on electrophysiological signals. We then assess the probe's ability to both optogenetically stimulate and electrically record neural firing. SIGNIFICANCE: This device relies on nanofabrication techniques to integrate optical stimulation and electrical readout functions on the same structure. Due to the device miniaturization capabilities inherent to nanofabrication, this optoelectronic probe technology can be further scaled to increase the throughput of manipulating and recording neural dynamics.
OBJECTIVE: The convergence of optogenetic and large-scale neural recording technologies opens enormous opportunities for studying brain function. However, compared to the widespread use of optogenetics or recordings as standalone methods, the joint use of these techniques in behaving animals is much less well developed. A simple but poorly scalable solution has been to implant conventional optical fibers together with extracellular microelectrodes. A more promising approach has been to combine microfabricated light emission sources with multielectrode arrays. However, a challenge remains in how to compactly and scalably integrate optical output and electronic readout structures on the same device. Here we took a step toward addressing this issue by using nanofabrication techniques to develop a novel implantable optoelectronic probe. APPROACH: This device contains multiple photonic grating couplers connected with waveguides for out-of-plane light emission, monolithically integrated with a microlectrode array on the same silicon substrate. To demonstrate the device's operation in vivo, we record cortical activity from awake head-restrained mice. MAIN RESULTS: We first characterize photo-stimulation effects on electrophysiological signals. We then assess the probe's ability to both optogenetically stimulate and electrically record neural firing. SIGNIFICANCE: This device relies on nanofabrication techniques to integrate optical stimulation and electrical readout functions on the same structure. Due to the device miniaturization capabilities inherent to nanofabrication, this optoelectronic probe technology can be further scaled to increase the throughput of manipulating and recording neural dynamics.
Authors: Justin L Shobe; Leslie D Claar; Sepideh Parhami; Konstantin I Bakhurin; Sotiris C Masmanidis Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2015-07-01 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Kwang Lee; Sandra M Holley; Justin L Shobe; Natalie C Chong; Carlos Cepeda; Michael S Levine; Sotiris C Masmanidis Journal: Neuron Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: James J Jun; Nicholas A Steinmetz; Joshua H Siegle; Daniel J Denman; Marius Bauza; Brian Barbarits; Albert K Lee; Costas A Anastassiou; Alexandru Andrei; Çağatay Aydın; Mladen Barbic; Timothy J Blanche; Vincent Bonin; João Couto; Barundeb Dutta; Sergey L Gratiy; Diego A Gutnisky; Michael Häusser; Bill Karsh; Peter Ledochowitsch; Carolina Mora Lopez; Catalin Mitelut; Silke Musa; Michael Okun; Marius Pachitariu; Jan Putzeys; P Dylan Rich; Cyrille Rossant; Wei-Lung Sun; Karel Svoboda; Matteo Carandini; Kenneth D Harris; Christof Koch; John O'Keefe; Timothy D Harris Journal: Nature Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jorg Scholvin; Justin P Kinney; Jacob G Bernstein; Caroline Moore-Kochlacs; Nancy Kopell; Clifton G Fonstad; Edward S Boyden Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Jessica A Cardin; Marie Carlén; Konstantinos Meletis; Ulf Knoblich; Feng Zhang; Karl Deisseroth; Li-Huei Tsai; Christopher I Moore Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2010-01-21 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: György Buzsáki; Eran Stark; Antal Berényi; Dion Khodagholy; Daryl R Kipke; Euisik Yoon; Kensall D Wise Journal: Neuron Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Seung-Hee Lee; Alex C Kwan; Siyu Zhang; Victoria Phoumthipphavong; John G Flannery; Sotiris C Masmanidis; Hiroki Taniguchi; Z Josh Huang; Feng Zhang; Edward S Boyden; Karl Deisseroth; Yang Dan Journal: Nature Date: 2012-08-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Aseema Mohanty; Qian Li; Mohammad Amin Tadayon; Samantha P Roberts; Gaurang R Bhatt; Euijae Shim; Xingchen Ji; Jaime Cardenas; Steven A Miller; Adam Kepecs; Michal Lipson Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 25.671
Authors: Jason E Chung; Hannah R Joo; Jiang Lan Fan; Daniel F Liu; Alex H Barnett; Supin Chen; Charlotte Geaghan-Breiner; Mattias P Karlsson; Magnus Karlsson; Kye Y Lee; Hexin Liang; Jeremy F Magland; Jeanine A Pebbles; Angela C Tooker; Leslie F Greengard; Vanessa M Tolosa; Loren M Frank Journal: Neuron Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 17.173