Literature DB >> 29629780

Emotional prosody of task-irrelevant speech interferes with the retention of serial order.

Florian Kattner1, Wolfgang Ellermeier1.   

Abstract

Task-irrelevant speech and other temporally changing sounds are known to interfere with the short-term memorization of ordered verbal materials, as compared to silence or stationary sounds. It has been argued that this disruption of short-term memory (STM) may be due to (a) interference of automatically encoded acoustical fluctuations with the process of serial rehearsal or (b) attentional capture by salient task-irrelevant information. To disentangle the contributions of these 2 processes, the authors investigated whether the disruption of serial recall is due to the semantic or acoustical properties of task-irrelevant speech (Experiment 1). They found that performance was affected by the prosody (emotional intonation), but not by the semantics (word meaning), of irrelevant speech, suggesting that the disruption of serial recall is due to interference of precategorically encoded changing-state sound (with higher fluctuation strength of emotionally intonated speech). The authors further demonstrated a functional distinction between this form of distraction and attentional capture by contrasting the effect of (a) speech prosody and (b) sudden prosody deviations on both serial and nonserial STM tasks (Experiment 2). Although serial recall was again sensitive to the emotional prosody of irrelevant speech, performance on a nonserial missing-item task was unaffected by the presence of neutral or emotionally intonated speech sounds. In contrast, sudden prosody changes tended to impair performance on both tasks, suggesting an independent effect of attentional capture. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29629780     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  5 in total

1.  Cross-modal transfer after auditory task-switching training.

Authors:  Florian Kattner; Larissa Samaan; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-07

2.  No sound is more distracting than the one you're trying not to hear: delayed costs of mental control of task-irrelevant neutral and emotional sounds.

Authors:  Örn Kolbeinsson; Erkin Asutay; Manja Enström; Jonas Sand; Hugo Hesser
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-02-21

3.  Task-specific auditory distraction in serial recall and mental arithmetic.

Authors:  Florian Kattner; Sarah Hanl; Linda Paul; Wolfgang Ellermeier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-10-14

4.  Negative target stimuli do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction.

Authors:  Saskia Kaiser; Axel Buchner; Laura Mieth; Raoul Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Dissociating the Disruptive Effects of Irrelevant Music and Speech on Serial Recall of Tonal and Verbal Sequences.

Authors:  Florian Kattner; Hanna Meinhardt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.