| Literature DB >> 29629344 |
Kader Turkekul1, R Dilsu Colpan1, Talha Baykul1, Mehmet D Ozdemir1, Suat Erdogan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most important causes of death in men and thus new therapeutic approaches are needed. In this study, antiproliferative and anti-migration properties of a coumarin derivative esculetin were evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: Apoptosis; Cancer prevention; Cell cycle; Esculetin; Prostate cancer
Year: 2018 PMID: 29629344 PMCID: PMC5886490 DOI: 10.15430/JCP.2018.23.1.10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer Prev ISSN: 2288-3649
Primer sequences used in this study for reverse transcription and quantitative real-time PCR analysis
| Genes and accession number | Primers |
|---|---|
| F: 5′-AGGGGACAGGGAGAAGAGAG-3′ | |
| NM_001346092.1 | R: 5′-GTGCACACGGTGTTCTGTTT-3′ |
| F: 5′-ATGTGTGTGGAGAGCGTCAA-3′ | |
| NM_000633.2 | R: 5′-ACAGTTCCACAAAGGCATCC-3′ |
| F: 5′-GGCATTGAGACAGACAGTGG-3′ | |
| NM_001354779.1 | R: 5′-CATGGAATCTGTTTCTTTGC-3′ |
| F: 5′-CTGCTGGGGATGGCCACTGTG-3′ | |
| XM_005246894.3 | R: 5′-TCGCCTCGAGGACATCGCTCTC-3′ |
| F: 5′-TTGCTTCAGGGTTTCATCCA-3′ | |
| XM_017027077.1 | R: 5′-CAGCCTTGAGCACCAGTTTG-3′ |
| Cytochrome | F: 5′-AGTGGCTAGAGTGGTCATTCATTTACA-3′ |
| NM_018947.5 | R: 5′-TCATGATCTGAATTCTGGTGTATGAGA-3′ |
| F: 5′-GGCGTTTGGAGTGGTAGAAA-3′ | |
| NM_001291549.1 | R: 5′-GACTCTCAGGGTCGAAAACG-3′ |
| F: 5′-CCGGCTAACTCTGAGGACAC-3′ | |
| NM_004064.4 | R: 5′-TTGCAGGTCGCTTCCTTATT-3′ |
| F: 5′-GAGGTTGGCTCTGACTGTACC-3′ | |
| NM_001126118.1 | R: 5′-TCCGTCCCAGTAGATTACCAC-3′ |
| F: 5′-GTACCTCCCCTGGATGAAGAT-3′ | |
| NM_001290230.1 | R: 5′-CGAAATCCGCTTGTTAGGGTC-3′ |
| F: 5′-CTGGTGTTTGAGCATGTAGACC-3′ | |
| NM_000075.3 | R: 5′-GATCCTTGATCGTTTCGGCTG-3′ |
| F: 5′-CGTCCATGCGGAAGATC-3′ | |
| NM_053056.2 | R: 5′-CAGAGGGCAACGAAGGT-3′ |
| F: 5′-ATGAGTATGCCTCCCCTGTG-3′ | |
| NM_004048.2 | F: 5′-CAAACCTCCATGATGCTGCTTAC-3′ |
Figure 1Esculetin inhibits proliferation of PC3, DU145, and LNCaP PCa cells. (A, B) The cell viability was measured by MTT test after esculetin treatments. PC3 cells were treated with various concentrations of esculetin (9.4–600 μM) for 24 to 72 hours. (C) PC3, DU145, and LNCaP cells were exposed to different concentrations of esculetin (25–600 μM) for 48 hours. Each column represents the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 compared with untreated (Ut).
Figure 2Esculetin dose-dependently induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest of PC3, DU145, and LNCaP cells. The cells were treated with 25 μM, 50 μM, and 150 μM esculetin for 48 hours, then apoptosis rates and cell cycle analyses were determined by image-based cytometer. Live, dead, and apoptotic populations of (A) PC3, (B) DU145, and (C) LNCaP cells. Esculetin administration caused cell cycle arrest at G1 phase in (D) PC3, (E) DU145, and (F) LNCaP cells. *P < 0.05 vs. untreated (Ut), **P < 0.01 vs. Ut and 25 μM esculetin, ***P < 0.01 vs. Ut, 25 and 75 μM esculetin groups.
Figure 3Effect of esculetin on apoptosis- and cell cycle-related gene expression. The cells were treated with 25 μM, 75 μM, 150 μM, and 300 μM of esculetin for 48 hours, and then targeted mRNA expressions were analyzed by reverse transcription and quantitative real-time PCR. (A) The fold changes of apoptosis-associated genes and (B) cell cycle related genes were plotted on graphs. For each group, two different experiments were performed in triplicate (mean ± SD). *P < 0.05 vs. untreated (Ut) and 0.
Figure 4Effect of esculetin on cell migration and protein expression. (A) PC3 cell migration was determined by wound healing assay during treatment with 25 μM, 75 μM, and 150 μM esculetin during 48 hours in serum-free medium. Esculetin dose-dependently reduced cell migration (magnifications of all fictures: ×10). (B) The migration ratio (%) was calculated by measuring the distance between two sides. (C) Protein lysates were analyzed by Western blotting. Beta-actin was used as loading control. Protein expression levels of phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) and cytochrome c (Cyc c), and phosphorylation status of Akt are given as fold changes of each protein compared to loading control (cont). (D) The intensities of immunoreactive bands were quantified by densitometric analysis. *P < 0.01 vs. 0 hour, **P < 0.01 vs. 25 μM and 75 μM esculetin, aP < 0.01 vs. all groups at the same time period.