Literature DB >> 29629309

Ectopic pregnancy after hysterectomy may not be so uncommon: A case report and review of the literature.

Donald L Fylstra1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ectopic pregnancy after hysterectomy is a very uncommon event, but its frequency is increasing. Since first reported by Wendler in 1895, 71 cases of post-hysterectomy have been reported. CASE: A woman, 2 years after an abdominal supracervical hysterectomy, presented with a ruptured fallopian tube ectopic pregnancy.
CONCLUSION: Any woman, even after hysterectomy but with ovaries in situ, who presents with an acute abdomen or abdominal-pelvic pain should be screened for pregnancy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ectopic pregnancy; Hysterectomy; Vaginal–peritoneal fistula

Year:  2015        PMID: 29629309      PMCID: PMC5885999          DOI: 10.1016/j.crwh.2015.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health        ISSN: 2214-9112


Introduction

Ectopic pregnancy after hysterectomy is a very uncommon event, but its frequency is increasing. Since first reported by Wendler in 1895 [1], fifty-six cases of post-hysterectomy ectopic pregnancies were reported by this author in 2009 [2]. Since that publication, 11 subsequent cases have been reported, and other additional cases have been found through a bibliography review. The total published number of cases is now 71. This author has treated the 72nd (Table 1).
Table 1

Pregnancy after hysterectomy.

Year publishedType of hysterectomyTime to diagnosis
Early presentations
Knaus [3]1937vag57 days
Girones [4]1952abd53 days
Adams and Schreier [5]1957abd86 days
Claus [6]1959abd29 days
Smythe [7]1961abd40 days
Graffagnino [8]1963vag59 days
Ledger and Daly [9]1963abd96 days
Moayer [10]1965vag35 days
McDaniel and Gullo [11]1968vag59 days
Wells [12]1970vag39 days
Grunberger [13]1971vagUnknown
Bruder and Vigilante [14]1973vag54 days
Niebyl [15]1973vag79 days
Alexander and Everidge [16]1979vag41 days
Cocks [17]1980vag26 days
Jackson [18]1980abda36 days
Buchan [19]1680abd6 weeks
Zdravkovic [20]1980abd5 weeks
Marut and Zucker [21]1981vag55 days
Williams [22]1981abd7 weeks
Zolli and Rocho [23]1982abd15 weeks
Nehra and Loginsky [24]1982vag30 days
Meizner et al. [25]1982abd12 weeks
Arora [4]1983vag47 days
Reese et al. [27]1989vag24 days
Gaeta et al. [28]1993abd2 months
Allen and East [29]1998LAVH6 weeks
Weisenfeld and Guido [30]2003abd12 weeks
Binder [31]2003vag13 weeks
Fader et al. [32]2007abd12 weeks



Late presentations
Wendler [1]1895vag6 years
Grigg [33]1920abd SC1 year
McMillan and Dunn [34]1921abd SC1
McMillan and Dunn [34]1921abd SCb2
Weil [35]1938vag5 years
Connors et al. [36]1943abd SCc4 years
Brown and Shields [37]1944abd SC1 year
Frech [38]1948vag9 years
Lyle and Christianson [39]1955vag11 years
Gordy and Otis [40]1961abd14 months
Zaczek [41]1963abd7 months
Hanes [42]1963vag9 months
Kornblatt [43]1968vag12 months
Altinger [44]1973vag2 years
Sims and Letts [45]1973vag2 years
Schnell and Sinn [46]1982vagUnknown
Heidenreich et al. [47]1983vag1 year
Salmi et al. [48]1984vag3 years
Beuthe and Wemken [49]1985vagSeveral years
Culpepper [50]1985vag6 years
Casco et al. [51]1992vag5 years
Isaacs et al. [52]1996vag8 years
Adeyemo et al. [53]1999LAVH2 1/2 years
Brown et al. [54]2002C-hyst12 years
Pasic et al. [55]2004LSH4 months
Nnochiri and Warwick [56]2007vag1 year
Tagore et al. [57]2007abd9 years
Babikian et al. [58]2008abd SC3 years
Rosa et al. [59]2009vag5 years
Fylstra [60]2009C-hyst6 years
Barhate et al. [61]2009vag2 years
Bansal et al. [62]2010abd SCd4 years
Ramos et al. [63]2010vage5 months
Hitti et al. [64]2010abd SCb7 years
Anupama et al. [65]2012abd SC11
Friedman et al. [66]2013vag5 years
Villegas et al. [67]2014abd SC2
Anis et al. [68]2013abd SC6 years
Cook and Davies [69].2014abd2 years
Yesilyurt et al. [70]2014C-hyst3 years

vag: vaginal hysterectomy.

abd: abdominal hysterectomy.

abd SC: abdominal supracervical hysterectomy.

LAVH: laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

LSH: laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.

C-hyst: cesarean hysterectomy.

Diagnosed at 23 weeks and delivered electively a healthy infant at 36 weeks.

Second case of post-hysterectomy ectopic in the same woman.

Vaginal delivery at 6 months living infant. Supracervical hysterectomy later followed by trachelectomy.

Emergent subtotal hysterectomy for PPH after the 3rd cesarean.

Vaginal removal, vaginal cuff opened and tubal pregnancy removed.

Pregnancy after hysterectomy. vag: vaginal hysterectomy. abd: abdominal hysterectomy. abd SC: abdominal supracervical hysterectomy. LAVH: laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy. LSH: laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. C-hyst: cesarean hysterectomy. Diagnosed at 23 weeks and delivered electively a healthy infant at 36 weeks. Second case of post-hysterectomy ectopic in the same woman. Vaginal delivery at 6 months living infant. Supracervical hysterectomy later followed by trachelectomy. Emergent subtotal hysterectomy for PPH after the 3rd cesarean. Vaginal removal, vaginal cuff opened and tubal pregnancy removed.

Case

A 32 year old woman, Gravida 5, Para 4, with a history of a prior abdominal supracervical hysterectomy presented with the acute onset of severe abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, and vaginal bleeding. A pregnancy test was positive. A serum human chorionic gonadotropin level was 2279 mIU/ml. Her last delivery, 2 years prior, was her third cesarean, complicated by post-operative bleeding requiring abdominal re-exploration and an emergent supracervical hysterectomy. Very dense pelvic adhesions were described during this operation. Upon presentation she was found on abdominal ultrasound to have a large volume hemoperitoneum. Her abdomen was explored via laparotomy finding a ruptured, bleeding right fallopian tube ectopic pregnancy with a 2000 ml hemoperitoneum. The right fallopian tube and ovary were densely adherent to the residual cervical stump. The right adnexum and the cervix were removed. Post-operative transfusion was required, but she recovered uneventfully.

Comment

Thirty of the now 72 cases of ectopic pregnancies after hysterectomy occurred in the immediate period after hysterectomy, “early presentation,” suggesting that a pregnancy, or a potential for pregnancy, existed at the time the hysterectomy was performed. An immediate prehysterectomy pregnancy test would not be expected to be positive under such circumstances, and an early pregnancy diagnosis would be unlikely. This has occurred after all types of hysterectomy [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32]. This is presumed to occur because an unrecognized, preclinical (luteal phase) pregnancy existed at the time of hysterectomy: a preimplanted fertilized ovum was in transit and confined to the fallopian tube, or sperm was present within the fallopian tube when the hysterectomy was performed in a periovulatory period, allowing postoperative fertilization and tubal implantation. Because the symptoms of ectopic pregnancy can be mimicked by common immediate complications after hysterectomy, such as protracted abdominal pain, pelvic hematoma formation, vaginal cuff infection, and vaginal bleeding, ectopic pregnancy is rarely expected in most cases until additional imaging or repeat operation confirms the diagnosis [2], [22], [26], [27], [29], [30]. Therefore, the prevention of “early presentation” ectopic pregnancy after hysterectomy is the prevention of pregnancy before hysterectomy. As previously recommended, hysterectomy, like tubal sterilization, should be avoided in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle in those women not previously sterilized or not using reliable contraception, unless no vaginal intercourse has occurred during the preoperative period. Women should be preoperatively counseled as such. Any woman who has undergone hysterectomy and had not previously undergone tubal sterilization or had a partner vasectomy, or was not using reliable contemporaneous contraception, should be considered at risk for this diagnosis, should otherwise unexplained postoperative pain or bleeding occurs. Interestingly, no additional early post-hysterectomy pregnancies have been reported since this author's 2009 report. Ectopic pregnancy has been reported to occur as late as 12 years after hysterectomy, “late presentation,” and 42 such cases have now been reported [1], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], including this latest case treated by this author. This can only develop because the sperm have gained access to the peritoneal cavity through a fistulous tract between the vagina and the peritoneal cavity. Although this has occurred after all types of hysterectomy, 50% follow vaginal hysterectomy [1], [35], [38], [39], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [56], [59], [61], [63], [66], and this would suggest a causal relationship. Although the operative narrative for the hysterectomy was seldom available to the physicians treating the ectopic pregnancy after hysterectomy, observations thought to increase the chance for vaginal-to-peritoneal fistula formation include an open vaginal cuff closure technique, vaginal cuff infection or hematoma formation after hysterectomy, vaginal cuff granulation tissue, and a prolapsed fallopian tube [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [59]. The usual method of vaginal cuff closure differs between vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. The adnexal structures are brought into closer proximity of the vaginal cuff with vaginal hysterectomy cuff closure, and can even be incorporated into the peritoneal closure, increasing the change for a prolapsed fallopian tube into the vaginal cuff or the development of a vaginal-to-peritoneal or tubo-vaginal fistula [47], [49]. “Late presentation” ectopic pregnancies after total abdominal hysterectomy have been reported, indicating that vaginal-to-peritoneal fistula can even develop after this procedure. However, the small number of such cases would suggest that it is less likely to occur, presumably because the residual fallopian tubes and ovaries are more distant from the vaginal cuff during abdominal hysterectomy cuff closure, and the commonly used technique of closure of the pelvic floor parietal peritoneum over the vaginal cuff isolates the vagina from the peritoneal cavity [47]. These numbers of ectopic pregnancies and the hysterectomy method differences are suggestive that the risk would be greater after vaginal hysterectomy, but this is not based on any proven medical evidence. Subtotal hysterectomy has increased in the United States in the past decade, estimated to now make up 7.5% of all hysterectomies performed [70], [71], [72]. Fourteen cases of “late presentation” ectopic pregnancy have followed supracervical or cesarean hysterectomy, including the current case [33], [34], [36], [37], [56], [59], [61], [63], [65], [66], [67], [68]. Leaving a remnant of the cervix or the epithelialization of a much larger vaginal cuff closure area because of cervical dilation at the time of cesarean hysterectomy may increase fistulous tract formation [54], [73]. With the now more commonly performed laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, this author and other investigators are concerned about a potential increase in the incidence of ectopic pregnancy after hysterectomy. The commonly used technique of cauterizing the residual proximal cervical canal to prevent cyclic vaginal bleeding after hysterectomy at the time of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy may not be adequate to prevent patency of the cervical canal. Pathologic identification of such a communication through a residual cervix has been documented [58]. Cautery of the cervical canal and cervical stump at the time of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy has also failed to prevent a patent cervical canal and an ectopic pregnancy after hysterectomy [55]. It may not be possible to prevent all “late presentation” ectopic pregnancies after hysterectomy, but its prevention is the prevention of vaginal-to-peritoneal cavity communication. Vaginal cuff closure, regardless of operative technique, should be sure not to incorporate the fallopian tube into the vaginal cuff, and postoperative vaginal cuff granulation tissue, a very common finding, must be differentiated from a portion of prolapsed fallopian tube, with biopsy, if necessary [74]. When the cervix is left in situ, techniques should be used to obliterate or isolate the residual cervical canal, thus preventing a patent cervical canal allowing the sperm access to the peritoneal cavity. Ectopic pregnancy after hysterectomy is very rare. An estimated 600,000 hysterectomies are performed each year in the United States, and one-third of all US women will have had a hysterectomy by age 60 years [70], [71], [72]. Only 72 cases of ectopic pregnancy after hysterectomy have now been reported in the world's literature since 1895. This incidence is very small, but may be on the increase because of supracervical hysterectomy. This author recommends that any woman, even after hysterectomy but with ovaries in situ, who presents with an acute abdomen or abdominal–pelvic pain should be screened for pregnancy. A urine pregnancy test is readily available and inexpensive, and although ectopic pregnancy after hysterectomy has been very uncommon until now, only a high index of suspicion will make the diagnosis.
  62 in total

1.  Ectopic pregnancy following hysterectomy.

Authors:  H J SMYTHE
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp       Date:  1961-10

2.  Ruptured tubal pregnancy following previous vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  H C FRECH
Journal:  J Med Assoc Ga       Date:  1948-12

3.  Ectopic pregnancy after total abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  S Cook; N Davies
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Pregnancy following total hysterectomy.

Authors:  J R Niebyl
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1974-06-15       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Abdominal pregnancy following total hysterectomy.

Authors:  V K Arora
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1983 Jul-Sep

6.  Tubal pregnancy after vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  T Salmi; R Punnonen; M Grönroos
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Abdominal pregnancy following hysterectomy.

Authors:  I Meizner; M Glezerman; D Ben Harroch; H Leventhal
Journal:  Isr J Med Sci       Date:  1983-03

8.  Ectopic pregnancy following total hysterectomy.

Authors:  P C Buchan
Journal:  Br J Clin Pract       Date:  1980-07

9.  Ectopic pregnancy after cesarean hysterectomy.

Authors:  Wendi D Brown; Lara Burrows; Catherine S Todd
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004.

Authors:  Maura K Whiteman; Susan D Hillis; Denise J Jamieson; Brian Morrow; Michelle N Podgornik; Kate M Brett; Polly A Marchbanks
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cervical stump pregnancy 6 years after subtotal hysterectomy: a case report.

Authors:  Dawud Muhammed Ahmed; Abebe Assaye Fetene; Eyaya Misgan Asres; Amsalu Worku Mekonnen; Hailu Gashe Mamuye
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2019-05-08

2.  A Case of Ectopic Tubal Pregnancy Eight Years After a Hysterectomy Presenting as a Diagnostic Challenge.

Authors:  Ciprian Ilea; Irina Stoian; Daniela Carauleanu; Demetra Socolov
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2019-10-31

3.  Ruptured ectopic pregnancy after hysterectomy with copper intrauterine device in place: A case report.

Authors:  Katie Pivarnik; Humera Syeda
Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health       Date:  2020-05-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.