BACKGROUND: Canada has a universal public health system where all resources must be allocated to optimize cost-effectiveness. Rapid diagnostic assessment programs (DAPs) and enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) may improve timeliness of care and postoperative outcomes and thus reduce costs. The use of DAPs and ERPs in lung cancer patients who undergo lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is still controversial. This study measured the time between preoperative workup and treatment with a DAP and evaluated the impact of an ERP postoperatively in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received a VATS lobectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent minimally invasive lobectomy for the primary treatment of lung cancer from January 2014 through May 2017 at our institution. Timelines of care were measured. Postoperatively, the duration of chest tube drainage, length of hospital stay, and incidence of complications were noted. RESULTS: During the study period, 646 patients underwent VATS lobectomy for stage I or II NSCLC; of these, 384 (59%) were assessed within the DAP. Using the DAP, the median time between the patient's first clinic visit and referral to surgery was 30.0 days [interquartile range (IQR), 21.0-40.0 days), and the median time between surgical consult and treatment was 29.0 days (IQR, 15.0-47.5 days). With the ERP, the median duration of chest drainage was 3.0 days (IQR, 2.0-6.0 days), and median hospital stay was 4.0 days (IQR, 3.0-7.0 days). CONCLUSIONS: DAPs and ERPs have promising roles in thoracic surgical practice. A rapid DAP can expedite the care trajectory of patients with lung cancer and has allowed our institution to adhere to governmental standards for the management of lung cancer. ERPs are feasible to establish and can effectively improve clinical outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Canada has a universal public health system where all resources must be allocated to optimize cost-effectiveness. Rapid diagnostic assessment programs (DAPs) and enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) may improve timeliness of care and postoperative outcomes and thus reduce costs. The use of DAPs and ERPs in lung cancer patients who undergo lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is still controversial. This study measured the time between preoperative workup and treatment with a DAP and evaluated the impact of an ERP postoperatively in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received a VATS lobectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent minimally invasive lobectomy for the primary treatment of lung cancer from January 2014 through May 2017 at our institution. Timelines of care were measured. Postoperatively, the duration of chest tube drainage, length of hospital stay, and incidence of complications were noted. RESULTS: During the study period, 646 patients underwent VATS lobectomy for stage I or II NSCLC; of these, 384 (59%) were assessed within the DAP. Using the DAP, the median time between the patient's first clinic visit and referral to surgery was 30.0 days [interquartile range (IQR), 21.0-40.0 days), and the median time between surgical consult and treatment was 29.0 days (IQR, 15.0-47.5 days). With the ERP, the median duration of chest drainage was 3.0 days (IQR, 2.0-6.0 days), and median hospital stay was 4.0 days (IQR, 3.0-7.0 days). CONCLUSIONS: DAPs and ERPs have promising roles in thoracic surgical practice. A rapid DAP can expedite the care trajectory of patients with lung cancer and has allowed our institution to adhere to governmental standards for the management of lung cancer. ERPs are feasible to establish and can effectively improve clinical outcomes.
Authors: Subroto Paul; Art Sedrakyan; Ya-Lin Chiu; Abu Nasar; Jeffrey L Port; Paul C Lee; Brendon M Stiles; Nasser K Altorki Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2012-07-22 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang; Hanghang Wang; Arvind Kumar; Xiaofei Wang; Matthew G Hartwig; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark F Berry Journal: Chest Date: 2017-08-08 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Krishna K Varadhan; Keith R Neal; Cornelius H C Dejong; Kenneth C H Fearon; Olle Ljungqvist; Dileep N Lobo Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2010-01-29 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Paul De Leyn; Christophe Dooms; Jaroslaw Kuzdzal; Didier Lardinois; Bernward Passlick; Ramon Rami-Porta; Akif Turna; Paul Van Schil; Frederico Venuta; David Waller; Walter Weder; Marcin Zielinski Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2014-08
Authors: Lin-Sheng Cai; Bo Hou; Hua Jin; Yun Bo; Xin-Long Chen; Jun Dai; Tao Yang; Bao-Shi Lan; Jia Ye; Hao Peng; Jun Peng Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2021-12
Authors: Erik M von Meyenfeldt; Femke van Nassau; Carlijn T I de Betue; L Barberio; Wilhelmina H Schreurs; Geertruid M H Marres; H Jaap Bonjer; Johannes Anema Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 2.692