Fawaz Al-Mufti1,2, Ahmad M Thabet1, Tarundeep Singh1, Mohammad El-Ghanem1,2, Krishna Amuluru2,3, Chirag D Gandhi4. 1. Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Radiology, Rutgers University-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers University-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA. 3. Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hamot, Erie, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. Westchester Medical Center, New York College of Medicine, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) represents 10-15% of all stroke cases in the US annually. Fewer than 40% of these patients ever reach long-term functional independence, and mortality rate is roughly 40% at 1 month. Due to the high morbidity and mortality rates after ICH, early detection of high-risk patients would be beneficial in directing the management course and goals of care. This review aims to discuss relevant clinical and radiographic characteristics that can serve as predictors of poor prognosis and examine their efficacy in predicting patient outcomes after ICH. SUMMARY: A literature review was conducted on various clinical and radiographic factors. They were examined for their predictive value in relation to ICH outcome. Studies that focused on each of these factors were included, and their results analyzed for trends with regard to incidence, patient outcome, and mortality rate. KEY MESSAGE: In this review, we examined clinical and radiographic characteristics that have been found to be significantly associated to a varying degree with poor outcome. Clinical and radiographic predictors of poor patient outcome are invaluable when it comes to identifying high-risk patients and triaging accordingly as well as guiding decision-making.
BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) represents 10-15% of all stroke cases in the US annually. Fewer than 40% of these patients ever reach long-term functional independence, and mortality rate is roughly 40% at 1 month. Due to the high morbidity and mortality rates after ICH, early detection of high-risk patients would be beneficial in directing the management course and goals of care. This review aims to discuss relevant clinical and radiographic characteristics that can serve as predictors of poor prognosis and examine their efficacy in predicting patient outcomes after ICH. SUMMARY: A literature review was conducted on various clinical and radiographic factors. They were examined for their predictive value in relation to ICH outcome. Studies that focused on each of these factors were included, and their results analyzed for trends with regard to incidence, patient outcome, and mortality rate. KEY MESSAGE: In this review, we examined clinical and radiographic characteristics that have been found to be significantly associated to a varying degree with poor outcome. Clinical and radiographic predictors of poor patient outcome are invaluable when it comes to identifying high-risk patients and triaging accordingly as well as guiding decision-making.
Authors: Paul Vespa; Robert Boonyaputthikul; David L McArthur; Chad Miller; Maria Etchepare; Marvin Bergsneider; Thomas Glenn; Neil Martin; David Hovda Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: E G van den Herik; E Y L Cheung; L M L de Lau; H M den Hertog; F W G Leebeek; D W J Dippel; P J Koudstaal; M P M de Maat Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2011-09-13 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: Georgios Tsivgoulis; Aristeidis H Katsanos; Kenneth S Butcher; Efstathios Boviatsis; Nikos Triantafyllou; Ioannis Rizos; Andrei V Alexandrov Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-09-19 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ken S Butcher; Tracey Baird; Lachlan MacGregor; Patricia Desmond; Brian Tress; Stephen Davis Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Joshua M Levine; Ryan Snider; David Finkelstein; Mahmut E Gurol; Rishi Chanderraj; Eric E Smith; Steven M Greenberg; Jonathan Rosand Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2007 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Zhe Kang Law; Michael Desborough; Ian Roberts; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Timothy J England; David J Werring; Thompson Robinson; Kailash Krishnan; Robert Dineen; Ann Charlotte Laska; Nils Peters; Juan Jose Egea-Guerrero; Michal Karlinski; Hanne Christensen; Christine Roffe; Daniel Bereczki; Serefnur Ozturk; Jegan Thanabalan; Rónán Collins; Maia Beridze; Philip M Bath; Nikola Sprigg Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Stefan P Haider; Adnan I Qureshi; Abhi Jain; Hishan Tharmaseelan; Elisa R Berson; Shahram Majidi; Christopher G Filippi; Adrian Mak; David J Werring; Julian N Acosta; Ajay Malhotra; Jennifer A Kim; Lauren H Sansing; Guido J Falcone; Kevin N Sheth; Seyedmehdi Payabvash Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 6.948
Authors: Pascal Salazar; Mario Di Napoli; Mostafa Jafari; Alibay Jafarli; Wendy Ziai; Alexander Petersen; Stephan A Mayer; Eric M Bershad; Rahul Damani; Afshin A Divani Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Vidhya V; Anjan Gudigar; U Raghavendra; Ajay Hegde; Girish R Menon; Filippo Molinari; Edward J Ciaccio; U Rajendra Acharya Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Stefan P Haider; Adnan I Qureshi; Abhi Jain; Hishan Tharmaseelan; Elisa R Berson; Tal Zeevi; Shahram Majidi; Christopher G Filippi; Simon Iseke; Moritz Gross; Julian N Acosta; Ajay Malhotra; Jennifer A Kim; Lauren H Sansing; Guido J Falcone; Kevin N Sheth; Seyedmehdi Payabvash Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2021-07-18 Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Ana Lopez-de-Andres; Rodrigo Jimenez-Garcia; Valentín Hernández-Barrera; Isabel Jiménez-Trujillo; José M de Miguel-Yanes; David Carabantes-Alarcon; Javier de Miguel-Diez; Marta Lopez-Herranz Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 9.951