| Literature DB >> 29628910 |
Radek Janca1, Pavel Krsek2, Petr Jezdik1, Roman Cmejla1, Martin Tomasek3, Vladimir Komarek2, Petr Marusic3, Premysl Jiruska4.
Abstract
Between seizures, irritative network generates frequent brief synchronous activity, which manifests on the EEG as interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs). Recent insights into the mechanism of IEDs at the microscopic level have demonstrated a high variance in the recruitment of neuronal populations generating IEDs and a high variability in the trajectories through which IEDs propagate across the brain. These phenomena represent one of the major constraints for precise characterization of network organization and for the utilization of IEDs during presurgical evaluations. We have developed a new approach to dissect human neocortical irritative networks and quantify their properties. We have demonstrated that irritative network has modular nature and it is composed of multiple independent sub-regions, each with specific IED propagation trajectories and differing in the extent of IED activity generated. The global activity of the irritative network is determined by long-term and circadian fluctuations in sub-region spatiotemporal properties. Also, the most active sub-region co-localizes with the seizure onset zone in 12/14 cases. This study demonstrates that principles of recruitment variability and propagation are conserved at the macroscopic level and that they determine irritative network properties in humans. Functional stratification of the irritative network increases the diagnostic yield of intracranial investigations with the potential to improve the outcomes of surgical treatment of neocortical epilepsy.Entities:
Keywords: brain networks; epilepsy surgery; interictal epileptiform discharges; irritative zone; neocortical epilepsy; propagation
Year: 2018 PMID: 29628910 PMCID: PMC5876241 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Summary of clinical information of 14 pediatric patients: 10 females, 4 males; age 3–18 years, 9.7 ± 4.0 (median 9.5) in average.
| Patient | Epilepsy syndrome | Duration (years) | MR | Etiology (histopathology) | Surgical outcome (Engel sc.) | Follow-up (years) | Type of surgery | Size of surgery | Localization of surgery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1* | Right SSMA | 7 | Negative | FCD | I | 4 | IR | FR | Right SSMA |
| P2 | Left T | 9 | Positive | Ganglioglima + FCD | I | 4 | IR | ULR | Basal part of left temporal lobe + AHC |
| P3 | Left F | 8 | Positive | Encephalitis | I | 9 | EL | ULR | Left frontal convexity close to SSMA and motor area |
| P4 | Right F | 5 | Positive | TSC | I | 3 | IR | FR | Right frontal convexity—prior to motor area |
| P5 | Left SSMA | 3 | Negative | FCD | I | 10 | EL | FR | Left SSMA |
| P6* | Right I | 3 | Positive | FCD | I | 3 | IR | FR | Right frontal operculum and insula |
| P7 | Right F | 2 | Negative | FCD | I | 9 | IR | ULR | Right frontal convexity—prior to motor area |
| P8* | Right F | 16 | Negative | FCD | II | 2 | IR | ULR | Right orbitofrontal cortex |
| P9 | Left FCT + I | 4 | Negative | FCD | III | 10 | IR | FR | Left temporal operculum and dorsal insula |
| P10* | Right TPO | 8 | Positive | FCD | IV | 4 | IR | MLR | Right temporal, parietal and occipital lobe |
| P11* | Right FT | 3 | Positive | Encephalitis | IV | 3 | IR | MLR | Right frontal convexity and temporal lobe |
| P12 | Left T | 3 | Negative | FCD | IV | 10 | IR | ULR | Left temporal neocortex |
| P13 | Left CTPO | 9 | Negative | FCD | IV | 11 | IR | ULR | Left parietal, occipital lobe, partially temporal lobe |
| P14 | Left FCP | 3 | Positive | TSC | IV | 6 | IR | ULR | Left frontal convexity prior to motor cortex |
Sampled recordings by 1 kHz are marked by star.
FCD, focal cortical dysplasia; SSMA, supplementary sensorimotor area; TSC, tuberous sclerosis complex; F, frontal; T, temporal; P, parietal; O, occipital; C, central; I, insular; IR, individual resection; EL, extended lesionectomy; FR, focal resection; ULR, unilobar resection; MLR, multilobar resection; AHC, amygdalo-hippocampal complex; MR, magnetic resonance.
Figure 1Interictal epileptiform discharge (IED) sorting according to their spatial profile. (A) Raw data corresponds with its 10–60 Hz signal envelope, which contains multiple IEDs and also a technical artifact (*). The absolute maximal amplitude and time position of IEDs is defined from the peaks of their envelopes. (B) Detected IEDs with a sequential delay of <5 ms are considered as a single IED event (gray lines in the envelope). The events are merged to event time-series matrices. (C) Event matrix S contains maximum of the envelope amplitude recorded in each channel during the single IED event, (F) equally the matrix Q stores binary information about detected IEDs (1—IED detected in the channel, 0—no detection). (D) Matrix S is decomposed using principal component analysis, which extracts components (i.e., common amplitude spatial profiles). Each component is characterized by its eigenvalue, which represents the contribution of columns of matrix S before transformation by eigenvectors. In this schematic, first seven principal components were showed (roman numbers I–VII), but only two of them were significant (components I and II) through “random average under permutation” technique (19). This step is followed by sorting detected IED events into groups according to their spatial profile, which combines information from the spatial distribution and amplitude of the envelopes. Each column of matrix S (spatial profile of the IED event) is correlated with the all components (E) and assigned to the best fitting group (F) by the maximal correlation. In this example, detected IEDs were assigned to two significant spatial profile groups (I and II). (F) Corresponding columns from matrix Q are also assigned to the appropriate group. The spatial profile of each group determines the sub-region. For example, the analysis of the corresponding matrix Q provides information about the sub-region’s activity and IED rate (G). The IED profiles were co-registered with fused MRI/computer tomography images, average IED waveform is extracted from raw intracranial EEG (iEEG) for visual inspection. (H) The “mixture model” theory allows identification of the existence of local IED sources, which are outside the area of maximal IED occurrence. This area represents joint areas of propagation. Note that the detected artifact (*) was assigned to the non-significant eigenvector in the group V and automatically rejected from subsequent steps of analysis.
Figure 2Analysis of the spatial profile of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) in Case 1 (P1). Computer tomography-MRI 3D-reconstruction of the electrode placement is in panel (A). Spatial profile of all detected IEDs shows (B). IED profiles (C) and average intracranial EEG waveforms (D) of three independent sub-regions identified by the sorting algorithm reveals the heterogeneous nature of the irritative network. The sub-region containing oscillatory activity from the sensorimotor cortex (SMC, el. Gd1–3) was excluded during visual evaluation. Sub-regions #1 and #3 had high spatial overlap and were visualized together. They were localized in the mesial surface under grid M, overlapped with the seizure onset zone (SOZ), and joint sub-region activity was 55%. Sub-region #2 is localized over the convexity (grid G) and its activity was 35%. Resection (dashed red line) involved the SOZ and sub-regions #1 and #3.
Figure 3Analysis of the spatial profile of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) in Case 2 (P11). Computer tomography-MRI 3D-reconstruction of the electrode placement is in panel (A). Depth electrodes are visualized schematically and are not visible in surface projections. Spatial profile of all detected IEDs is in panel (B), which were present over large areas of the right hemisphere. Three major identified sub-regions (C) and their corresponding activity and average waveforms (D) are shown. The most active part of sub-region #1 was not included in the resection (dashed red line).
Summary of the interictal epileptiform discharge (IED) sorting results.
| Patient | Number of contacts | Data analyzed (min.) | Number of sub-regions | Average rate of IED events (min | Max. IED rate in channel (min | Sub-region’s activities (% of events) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1* | 48 | 27 | 5 | 73 | 16 | 39, 35, 16, 8, … |
| P2 | 66 | 104 | 10 | 141 | 18 | 24, 18, 13, 13, 10, 5, 5, … |
| P3 | 65 | 132 | 14 | 324 | 56 | 37, 13, 12, 7, 6, 6, 6, 4, … |
| P4* | 73 | 167 | 9 | 216 | 58 | 62, 26, 7, … |
| P5 | 64 | 49 | 8 | 113 | 33 | 38, 31, 14, 9, … |
| P6 | 50 | 50 | 3 | 99 | 22 | 86, 11, … |
| P7 | 98 | 90 | 9 | 30 | 5 | 40, 21, 13, 9, 7, … |
| P8 | 59 | 20 | 2 | 33 | 18 | 77, 23 |
| P9 | 64 | 99 | 17 | 94 | 12 | 25, 19, 14, 7, 6, 6, 3, 3, … |
| P10 | 122 | 60 | 20 | 355 | 49 | 25, 17, 9, 9, 6, 6,4, 3, 3, … |
| P11* | 67 | 216 | 16 | 256 | 40 | 57, 8, 8, 5, 4, 4, 4, … |
| P12 | 68 | 88 | 12 | 123 | 20 | 29, 26, 22, 9, 3, 3, … |
| P13 | 64 | 59 | 16 | 152 | 36 | 29, 17, 13, 9, 9, 8, 4, 3, … |
| P14 | 108 | 120 | 16 | 170 | 41 | 65, 14, 5, 4, 3, 2, … |
Although the maximal IED rate in individual channel does not exceed 58 IED per minute, high events rate signalize independent activity of sub-regions.
Sampled recordings by 1 kHz are marked by star.
Figure 4The variation in interictal epileptiform discharge (IED) propagation through pathways (10) causes uncertainties of spike time tracking to source. (A) The decreasing IED rate trend reflects the IED amplitude loss during propagation from local source to farther areas by variable pathways. (B) Channels with the highest rate (low rank) also display the lowest time delay. It suggests that high IED rate together with low time delay mark the site of origin of IEDs within the sub-region and also the areas with high probability of IED propagation. The two-term exponential model was used for curve fitting; the equation for the model is the following f(x) = a exp(bx) + c exp(dx). Q1 and Q3 mark quartiles.
Figure 5An example of long-term dynamics (circadian and ultradian) of the irritative network in patient P2 demonstrates a non-uniform effect of vigilance to sub-regions interictal activity. Sleep is characterized by increased irritative network interictal epileptiform discharge (IED) rate (A). On the sub-regional level, long-term dynamics of each sub-region display various temporal profiles of IED rate (B) and spatial size (D). Each sub-region contribution to total IED rate varies depending mainly on vigilance state (C). However, the correlation between awake stages activity ratio (I and III) and sleep stages (II and IV) indicates two different network settings. (E) Corresponding simplified hypnogram shows sleep marked by red color.
Figure 6Quantification and comparison of sub-region dynamics during sleep and wakefulness. The average interictal epileptiform discharge (IED) rate of the entire irritative network (A) decreases during wakefulness. The average irritative network IED rate in each patient (B) shows a significant decrease of the IED rate in all patients (Mann–Whitney test, p < 0.001). Normalized network IED rate (C) displays proportional changes when compared to sleep values. Group data of sub-region IED rate (D) demonstrates a decrease in the rate during wakefulness. Sleep versus wakefulness changes in sub-region IED rate (E) demonstrates the presence of both: an increase and decrease in IED rate. In 83.7% of sub-regions, these changes were significant at p < 0.05. Normalized changes of sub-region IED rate shows (F). Wakefulness is usually associated with the reduction of the spatial extent of the sub-regions (G). Changes in spatial extent of each sub-region (H) and their normalized values (I) are shown. In 69.8% of cases, these changes were significant at p < 0.05. The bar marks mean value, “whiskers” SD. The asterisk marks statistical significance at p < 0.05.