| Literature DB >> 29628901 |
Michela Cortini1, Daniela Converso2.
Abstract
According to the Environmental Bubble Theory, tourists perform a series of strategies in order to remain anchored to their residential spots. The environmental bubble is constituted by a sort of social pellicule able to immunize tourists from the identity/cultural attacks which the visit to a foreign country implies. Such a pellicule is activated by the tourists themselves as they decide to travel in group or, for example, to eat only at the restaurants proposing their own national cuisine, and so on. Generally the potential cultural shock of residents is not taken into consideration in literature, even if it is plausibile to make the hypothesis of a counter-environmental bubble performed by the residents in order to defend their own culture and their identity from the attacks of mass tourism, especially for cities that live on tourism, as, for example, Florence or Siena do. Our study aims at testing the access to local tradition made available in promotional material. The hypothesis we propose is that there should exist a difference in promoting cultural heritage and intimate culture. The intimate culture refers to the living culture, the way of living, comprehending cuisine, education, religion, the way by which the role of females and males are performed, and so on. On the other hand, the cultural heritage, or historical culture, makes reference to a culture meant as belonging to the whole mankind, as it happens, for example, for archeological sites or museums. In more detail, we propose the hypothesis that the intimate culture is maintained unaccessible for tourists' gaze, or at least accessible only in the shape of a spectacularized event, the so called pseudo-event of Boorstin. Using the software NUD*IST we analyzed the promotional material of the city of Siena. Our results confirm Boorstin's theory about pseudo-events realized for tourists. The difference between cultural heritage and intimate culture promotion we have revealed shows an additional lecture of the Boorstinian framework, which makes an echo to the environmental bubble theory (Cohen, 1972), stressing the risk in terms of social and cultural identity tourism implies for both residents and tourists.Entities:
Keywords: NUD*IST; critical discourse analysis; environmental bubble theory; pseudo-events; tourism
Year: 2018 PMID: 29628901 PMCID: PMC5876287 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00354
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Attitude.
| 1.1 Object of interest | 1.1.1 Nature | The topic refers to the object “Nature” | “The wind rules on the green of the wheat, the sun bounces over the yellow of the spikes, the sky becomes immense” (Brochure Le Terre di Siena, p. 19) | |
| 1.1.2 Culture | The topic refers to the object “Culture” | |||
| 1.1.2.1 Intimate culture | Culture meant as “living culture” as a characteristic only of promoted resort | “Every district celebrates the celebrations of its own patron” (Brochure Le Terre di Siena, p. 33) | ||
| 1.1.2.2 Cultural heritage | Culture meant as belonging to the whole humankind as archeological sites or museum | “It recollects archeological evidences, especially Etrurian” (Folder “Museums” p. 9) | ||
| 1.2 Dimension of judgment | 1.2.1 Positive | Expression of positive evaluation | “Siena is so rich of masterpieces to become itself a masterpiece” (Brochure Le Terre di Siena, p. 5) | |
| 1.2.2 Negative | Expression of negative evaluation | |||
| 1.1.1 Positive vs. Negative | Comparison between negative and positive traits. | “The right evaluation of the work done by men who have not destroyed their heritage as it did happen in other parts of the Italian Peninsula” (Brochure Le Terre di Siena, p. 19) |
Accountability.
| 3.1 Communication strategies | 3.1.1 Verbal strategies | Use of graphemic system | ||
| 3.1.1.1 Personal narration | The enunciator talks in first person | “Siena, passionate and contemplative, has conquested me” (Folder “Siena”) | ||
| 3.1.1.2 Impersonal narration | “The land of Siena is like the sea: waves, curves, valleys and chase from sunrise to sunset, from spring to winter” (Brochure Le Terre di Siena, p. 19) | |||
| 3.1.2 Iconographic Strategies | Use of pictorial system | |||
| 3.2 Relational communication | 3.2.1 Transactive | |||
| 3.2.1.1 Clear transactive | The information is given in a clear and comprehensible way | “Civic Museum Pinacoteca, Via Ricci, 15 timetable: 10:00 a.m.−01:00 p.m. 03:00–06:00 p.m. Non-working days: 10:00 a.m.−06:00 p.m. Closed on monday, tel. 0875-4565777 5 Euro (Brochure Le Terre di Siena, p. 12) | ||
| 3.2.1.2 Vague transactive | The information is not given in a clear and comprehensible way | “August, 17th: Parade of the district that has won the Palio” (Brochure Le Terre di Siena, p. 34) | ||
| 3.2.2 Proximity | ||||
| 3.2.2.1 Personal proximity | Direct appeal to the potential tourist | “Here the reason why Siena, more than other cities, ‘open your heart,’ as it is stated on a famous inscription on Commollia door” (Brochure Le Terre di Siena, p. 19) | ||
| 3.2.2.2 Impersonal proximity | Indirect appeal to the potential tourist | “One discovers the taste of moving oneself slowly, of looking around and of looking inside oneself” (Brochure Le Terre di Siena, p. 19) |
Figure 1Category tree.
Figure 2Positioning of discourse.
Figure 3Object of discourse.
Figure 4Dimension of culture.
Figure 5Themes and vague transactivity.
Figure 6Communicative strategies.
Positioning.
| 2.1 Self | The page talks about the resort the enunciator belongs to | “The Siena cousine was born thanks to the landscape armony and it reflects its colors” (Brochure Le Terre di Siena, p. 23) | |
| 2.2 Other | The page talks about a different resort regarding that which the enunciator belongs to | ||
| Self vs. Other | Comparison between self and other | “Ancient olive trees and noble vineyards are the doc signature, the right evaluation of the work done by men who have not destroyed their heritage as it did happen in other parts of the Italian Peninsula” (Brochure Le Terre di Siena, p. 19) |