Literature DB >> 29628460

Effect of QRS Morphology and Duration on Clinical Outcomes After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Analysis of Japanese Multicenter Registry.

Takafumi Oka1, Koichi Inoue1, Koji Tanaka1, Yuko Hirao1, Takaaki Isshiki2, Takeshi Kimura3, Masakiyo Nobuyoshi4, Satoshi Shizuta3, Takeshi Arita4, Satoki Fujii5, Katsuomi Iwakura1, Kenshi Fujii1, Kenji Ando4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: QRS duration (QRSd) and morphology are established response predictors of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, evidence in Japanese populations is lacking.Methods and 
Results: We retrospectively analyzed the Japanese multicenter CRT database. We divided patients according to their intrinsic QRSd and morphology, and assessed echocardiographic responses and clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or hospitalization because of heart failure. A total of 510 patients were enrolled: 200 (39%) had left bundle branch block (LBBB) and QRSd ≥150 ms; 80 (16%) had LBBB (QRSd: 120-149 ms); 61 (12%) had non-LBBB (NLBBB) (QRSd: ≥150 ms); 54 (11%) had NLBBB (QRSd: 120-149 ms); 115 (23%), narrow (<120 ms). The proportion of echocardiographic responders was higher in LBBB (QRSd ≥150 ms) [74% vs. 51% vs. 38% vs. 52% vs. 50%, LBBB (QRSd ≥150 ms) vs. LBBB (QRSd 120-149 ms) vs. NLBBB (QRSd ≥150 ms) vs. NLBBB (QRSd 120-149 ms) vs. narrow, respectively, P<0.001]. During follow-up (3.2±1.5 years), the incidence of the primary endpoint was lowest in the LBBB group (QRSd ≥150) (28.6% vs. 42.3% vs. 45.9% vs. 55.6% vs. 55.3%, respectively, P<0.001). This difference was still significant after adjusting for other baseline characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: In this Japanese patient population, LBBB intrinsic QRS morphology and prolonged QRSd (≥150 ms) exhibited the best response to CRT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Intrinsic QRS morphology; QRS duration; Treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29628460     DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-1383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  3 in total

1.  Comparative effects of left bundle branch area pacing, His bundle pacing, biventricular pacing in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juan Hua; Chenxi Wang; Qiling Kong; Yichu Zhang; Qijun Wang; Ziyi Xiong; Jinzhu Hu; Juxiang Li; Qi Chen; Kui Hong
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Juan Hua; Yang Chen; Jianhua Yu; Qinmei Xiong; Zhen Xia; Zirong Xia; Qianghui Huang; Qiling Kong; Huolong Chen; Yichu Zhang; Jianxin Hu; Juxiang Li; Jinzhu Hu; Qi Chen; Kui Hong
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 1.814

3.  Design of Mid-Q Response: A prospective, randomized trial of adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy in Asian patients.

Authors:  Kengo Kusano; Seung-Jung Park; Sofian Johar; Toon Wei Lim; Bart Gerritse; Kazuhiro Hidaka; Kazutaka Aonuma
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2022-05-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.