Literature DB >> 29627769

Development and validation of an admission prediction tool for emergency departments in the Netherlands.

Nicole Kraaijvanger1, Douwe Rijpsma1, Lian Roovers2, Henk van Leeuwen3, Karin Kaasjager4, Lillian van den Brand5, Laura Horstink6, Michael Edwards7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Early prediction of admission has the potential to reduce length of stay in the ED. The aim of this study is to create a computerised tool to predict admission probability.
METHODS: The prediction rule was derived from data on all patients who visited the ED of the Rijnstate Hospital over two random weeks. Performing a multivariate logistic regression analysis factors associated with hospitalisation were explored. Using these data, a model was developed to predict admission probability. Prospective validation was performed at Rijnstate Hospital and in two regional hospitals with different baseline admission rates. The model was converted into a computerised tool that reported the admission probability for any patient at the time of triage.
RESULTS: Data from 1261 visits were included in the derivation of the rule. Four contributing factors for admission that could be determined at triage were identified: age, triage category, arrival mode and main symptom. Prospective validation showed that this model reliably predicts hospital admission in two community hospitals (area under the curve (AUC) 0.87, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.89) and in an academic hospital (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.80). In the community hospitals, using a cut-off of 80% for admission probability resulted in the highest number of true positives (actual admissions) with the greatest specificity (positive predictive value (PPV): 89.6, 95% CI 84.5 to 93.6; negative predictive value (NPV): 70.3, 95% CI 67.6 to 72.9). For the academic hospital, with a higher admission rate, a 90% probability was a better cut-off (PPV: 83.0, 95% CI 73.8 to 90.0; NPV: 59.3, 95% CI 54.2 to 64.2).
CONCLUSION: Admission probability for ED patients can be calculated using a prediction tool. Further research must show whether using this tool can improve patient flow in the ED. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crowding; emergency department; hospitalisations; management; planning

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29627769     DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  Development of a low-dimensional model to predict admissions from triage at a pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Fiona Leonard; John Gilligan; Michael J Barrett
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-07-15

2.  Predicting Admissions From a Paediatric Emergency Department - Protocol for Developing and Validating a Low-Dimensional Machine Learning Prediction Model.

Authors:  Fiona Leonard; John Gilligan; Michael J Barrett
Journal:  Front Big Data       Date:  2021-04-16

3.  Predicting inhospital admission at the emergency department: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anniek Brink; Jelmer Alsma; Lodewijk Aam van Attekum; Wichor M Bramer; Robert Zietse; Hester Lingsma; Stephanie Ce Schuit
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Use of Artificial Intelligence to Manage Patient Flow in Emergency Department during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective, Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Emilien Arnaud; Mahmoud Elbattah; Christine Ammirati; Gilles Dequen; Daniel Aiham Ghazali
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Leveraging Large-Scale Electronic Health Records and Interpretable Machine Learning for Clinical Decision Making at the Emergency Department: Protocol for System Development and Validation.

Authors:  Nan Liu; Feng Xie; Fahad Javaid Siddiqui; Andrew Fu Wah Ho; Bibhas Chakraborty; Gayathri Devi Nadarajan; Kenneth Boon Kiat Tan; Marcus Eng Hock Ong
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-03-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.