Literature DB >> 29627732

Responses of grapevine rootstocks to drought through altered root system architecture and root transcriptomic regulations.

Kubilay Yıldırım1, Adem Yağcı2, Seda Sucu2, Sümeyye Tunç3.   

Abstract

Roots are the major interface between the plant and various stress factors in the soil environment. Alteration of root system architecture (RSA) (root length, spread, number and length of lateral roots) in response to environmental changes is known to be an important strategy for plant adaptation and productivity. In light of ongoing climate changes and global warming predictions, the breeding of drought-tolerant grapevine cultivars is becoming a crucial factor for developing a sustainable viticulture. Root-trait modeling of grapevine rootstock for drought stress scenarios, together with high-throughput phenotyping and genotyping techniques, may provide a valuable background for breeding studies in viticulture. Here, tree grafted grapevine rootstocks (110R, 5BB and 41B) having differential RSA regulations and drought tolerance were investigated to define their drought dependent root characteristics. Root area, root length, ramification and number of root tips reduced less in 110R grafted grapevines compared to 5BB and 41B grafted ones during drought treatment. Root relative water content as well as total carbohydrate and nitrogen content were found to be much higher in the roots of 110R than it was in the roots of other rootstocks under drought. Microarray-based root transcriptome profiling was also conducted on the roots of these rootstocks to identify their gene regulation network behind drought-dependent RSA alterations. Transcriptome analysis revealed totally 2795, 1196 and 1612 differentially expressed transcripts at the severe drought for the roots of 110R, 5BB and 41B, respectively. According to this transcriptomic data, effective root elongation and enlargement performance of 110R were suggested to depend on three transcriptomic regulations. First one is the drought-dependent induction in sugar and protein transporters genes (SWEET and NRT1/PTR) in the roots of 110R to facilitate carbohydrate and nitrogen accumulation. In the roots of the same rootstock, expression increase in osmolyte producer genes revealed another transcriptomic regulation enabling effective root osmotic adjustment under drought stress. The third mechanism was linked to root suberization with upregulation of transcripts functional in wax producing enzymes (Caffeic acid 3-O-methyltransferase, Eceriferum3, 3-ketoacyl-CoAsynthase). These three transcriptomic regulations were suggested to provide essential energy and water preservation to the roots of 110R for its effective RSA regulation under drought. This phenotypic and genotypic knowledge could be used to develop root-dependent drought tolerant grapevines in breeding programs and could facilitate elucidation of genetic regulations behind RSA alteration in other plants.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drought; Grapevine rootstocks; Microarray; Root system architecture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29627732     DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.03.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol Biochem        ISSN: 0981-9428            Impact factor:   4.270


  10 in total

Review 1.  Effects of Combined Abiotic Stresses Related to Climate Change on Root Growth in Crops.

Authors:  Maria Sánchez-Bermúdez; Juan C Del Pozo; Mónica Pernas
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Overexpression of AmCBF1 enhances drought and cold stress tolerance, and improves photosynthesis in transgenic cotton.

Authors:  Guoqing Lu; Lihua Wang; Lili Zhou; Xiaofeng Su; Huiming Guo; Hongmei Cheng
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.061

3.  Response Strategies of Root System Architecture to Soil Environment: A Case Study of Single-Species Cupressus funebris Plantations.

Authors:  Wenchun He; Chao Luo; Yang Wang; Xiaochen Wen; Yu Wang; Tianyi Li; Gang Chen; Kuangji Zhao; Xianwei Li; Chuan Fan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Analysis of transcriptional responses in root tissue of bread wheat landrace (Triticum aestivum L.) reveals drought avoidance mechanisms under water scarcity.

Authors:  Mehrdad Chaichi; Forough Sanjarian; Khadijeh Razavi; Jose L Gonzalez-Hernandez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Isolation and expression analysis of Salt Overly Sensitive gene family in grapevine (Vitisvinifera) in response to salt and PEG stress.

Authors:  Yuanchun Ma; Li Wang; Jiaoyang Wang; Yan Zhong; Zong-Ming Max Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of two different host plant genera responding to grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 infection.

Authors:  Cecilia A Prator; Kar Mun Chooi; Dan Jones; Marcus W Davy; Robin M MacDiarmid; Rodrigo P P Almeida
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Root plasticity under abiotic stress.

Authors:  Rumyana Karlova; Damian Boer; Scott Hayes; Christa Testerink
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Wild grapevines as rootstock regulate the oxidative defense system of in vitro grafted scion varieties under drought stress.

Authors:  Fahad Nazir; Touqeer Ahmad; Saad Imran Malik; Mukhtar Ahmed; Muhammad Ajmal Bashir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Scion genotypes exert long distance control over rootstock transcriptome responses to low phosphate in grafted grapevine.

Authors:  Antoine T Gautier; Noé Cochetel; Isabelle Merlin; Cyril Hevin; Virginie Lauvergeat; Philippe Vivin; Alain Mollier; Nathalie Ollat; Sarah J Cookson
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  Discovering the bacteriome of Vitis vinifera cv. Pinot Noir in a conventionally managed vineyard.

Authors:  Elisa Gamalero; Elisa Bona; Giorgia Novello; Lara Boatti; Flavio Mignone; Nadia Massa; Patrizia Cesaro; Graziella Berta; Guido Lingua
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.