Literature DB >> 29627658

Routine chest X-ray is unnecessary after ultrasound-guided central venous line placement in the operating room.

David C Woodland1, C Randall Cooper2, M Farzan Rashid1, Vilma L Rosario1, Paul David Weyker3, Joshua Weintraub4, Stuart Bentley-Hibbert4, Michael D Kluger1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVC) can be useful for perioperative monitoring and insertion has low complication rates. However, routine post insertion chest X-rays have become standard of care and contribute to health care costs with limited impact on patient management.
METHODS: 200 patient charts who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with central line placement and early line removal were reviewed for clinical complications related to central line placement as well as radiographic evidence of malpositioning. A cost analysis was performed to estimate savings if CXR had not been performed across routine surgical procedures requiring central access.
RESULTS: In 200 central line placements for Whipple procedures, 198 lines were placed in the right internal jugular and 2 were placed in the subclavian. No cases of pneumothorax or hemothorax were identified and 30 (15.3%) of CVCs were improperly positioned. Only 1 (0.5%) of these was deemed clinically significant and repositioned after the CXR was performed.
CONCLUSION: Routine CXR consumes valuable time and resources (≅$155,000 annually) and rarely affects management. Selection should be guided by clinical factors.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central line placement; Chest X-ray; Post-operative imaging; Whipple procedure

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29627658     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  7 in total

1.  Massive hemothorax after central venous catheter insertion in a patient with multiple trauma.

Authors:  Jeong Heon Park; Jaegyok Song; Pyeong-Wha Oh
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-01-29

Review 2.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

3.  The Mediport Paradox: Mediastinitis and Pericardial Effusion With a Misplaced Mediport.

Authors:  Bilal Malik; Amman Yousaf; Mohammed Berrou; Arvind Kunadi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-28

4.  The role of routine chest radiography after implantable venous access port catheter insertion under the guide of ultrasonography and fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Hamed Ghoddusi Johari; Mohammad Reza Saki; Amirhossein Erfani; Reza Shahriarirad; Keivan Ranjbar
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2022-08-23

5.  Economic Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Confirmation vs Chest Radiography in Critically Ill Patients: A Labor Cost Model.

Authors:  Enyo A Ablordeppey; Adam M Koenig; Abigail R Barker; Emily E Hernandez; Suzanne M Simkovich; James G Krings; Derek S Brown; Richard T Griffey
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-09-15

6.  Point-of-care Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Confirmation in Ultrasound Nonexperts.

Authors:  Enyo A Ablordeppey; Anne M Drewry; Adam L Anderson; Diego Casali; Laura A Wallace; Deborah S Kane; LinLin Tian; Stacey L House; Brian M Fuller; Richard T Griffey; Daniel L Theodoro
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-10-13

7.  Emergency and critical care providers' perception about the use of bedside ultrasound for confirmation of above-diaphragm central venous catheter placement.

Authors:  Quincy K Tran; Mark Foster; Justin Bowler; Mia Lancaster; Jennifer Tchai; Katie Andersen; Ann Matta; Daniel J Haase
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-01-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.