Guangxin Chen1, Xin Ran1, Bai Li2, Yuhang Li1, Dewei He1, Bingxu Huang1, Shoupeng Fu1, Juxiong Liu3, Wei Wang4. 1. College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China. 2. The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China. 3. College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China. Electronic address: juxiong@jlu.edu.cn. 4. College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China. Electronic address: wang_wei99@jlu.edu.cn.
Abstract
G Protein Coupled Receptor 109A (GPR109A), which belongs to the G protein coupled receptor family, can be activated by niacin, butyrate, and β-hydroxybutyric acid. Here, we assessed the anti-inflammatory activity of sodium butyrate (SB) on 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis mice, an experimental model that resembles Crohn's disease, and explored the potential mechanism of SB in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In vivo, experimental GPR109a-/- and wild-type (WT) mice were administered SB (5g/L) in their drinking water for 6weeks. The mice were then administered TNBS via rectal perfusion to imitate colitis. In vitro, RAW246.7 macrophages, Caco-2 cells, and primary peritoneal macrophages were used to investigate the protective roles of SB on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory response and epithelium barrier dysfunction. In vivo, SB significantly ameliorated the inflammatory response and intestinal epithelium barrier dysfunction in TNBS-induced WT mice, but failed to provide a protective effect in TNBS-induced GPR109a-/- mice. In vitro, pre-treatment with SB dramatically inhibited the expression of TNF-α and IL-6 in LPS-induced RAW246.7 macrophages. SB inhibited the LPS-induced phosphorylation of the NF-κB p65 and AKT signaling pathways, but failed to inhibit the phosphorylation of the MAPK signaling pathway. Our data indicated that SB ameliorated the TNBS-induced inflammatory response and intestinal epithelium barrier dysfunction through activating GPR109A and inhibiting the AKT and NF-κB p65 signaling pathways. These findings therefore extend the understanding of GPR109A receptor function and provide a new theoretical basis for treatment of IBD.
G Protein Coupled Receptor 109A (GPR109A), which belongs to the G protein coupled receptor family, can be activated by niacin, butyrate, and β-hydroxybutyric acid. Here, we assessed the anti-inflammatory activity of sodium butyrate (SB) on 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitismice, an experimental model that resembles Crohn's disease, and explored the potential mechanism of SB in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In vivo, experimental GPR109a-/- and wild-type (WT) mice were administered SB (5g/L) in their drinking water for 6weeks. The mice were then administered TNBS via rectal perfusion to imitate colitis. In vitro, RAW246.7 macrophages, Caco-2 cells, and primary peritoneal macrophages were used to investigate the protective roles of SB on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory response and epithelium barrier dysfunction. In vivo, SB significantly ameliorated the inflammatory response and intestinal epithelium barrier dysfunction in TNBS-induced WT mice, but failed to provide a protective effect in TNBS-induced GPR109a-/- mice. In vitro, pre-treatment with SB dramatically inhibited the expression of TNF-α and IL-6 in LPS-induced RAW246.7 macrophages. SB inhibited the LPS-induced phosphorylation of the NF-κB p65 and AKT signaling pathways, but failed to inhibit the phosphorylation of the MAPK signaling pathway. Our data indicated that SB ameliorated the TNBS-induced inflammatory response and intestinal epithelium barrier dysfunction through activating GPR109A and inhibiting the AKT and NF-κB p65 signaling pathways. These findings therefore extend the understanding of GPR109A receptor function and provide a new theoretical basis for treatment of IBD.
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis (Baumgart and Sandborn, 2012; Beaugerie et al., 2006) are typically characterized by chronic, progressive, and relapsing inflammation of the intestine. Although the exact pathogenesis of IBD is unknown, it is considered to generally result from multiple immune, genetic, and environmental factors, with only suboptimal medical and surgical therapies being available (Farrell and Peppercorn, 2002). Previous studies have suggested that although the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease is similar, important differences do exist (Ungaro et al., 2017). Ulcerative colitis is characterized by relapsing and remitting mucosal inflammation, often initiating in the rectum and extending to proximal segments of the colon (Ungaro et al., 2017). However, Crohn's disease constitutes a chronic, relapsing, systemic inflammatory disease that mainly affects the gastrointestinal tract, along with extra-intestinal manifestations and associated immune disorders (Baumgart and Sandborn, 2012).GPR109A constitutes a Gi protein-coupled receptor that is activated by nicotinic acid (Soga et al., 2003; Tunaru et al., 2003; Wise et al., 2003), butyrate (Thangaraju et al., 2009), and beta-hydroxybutyric acid (Taggart et al., 2005). Previous studies have shown that the activation of GPR109A suppresses mammary tumorigenesis by inducing apoptosis in breast cancer cells (Elangovan et al., 2014). GPR109A is also linked to a pro-apoptotic pathway in neutrophils, suggesting that nicotinic acid may mediate anti-inflammatory effects in addition to its inhibitory function on adipocyte lipolysis (Kostylina et al., 2008). Moreover, as the ligand of GPR109A, niacin acid has the ability to reduce inflammation in atherosclerosis (Lukasova et al., 2011), obesity (Wanders et al., 2013), sepsis (Kwon et al., 2011), diabetic retinopathy (Gambhir et al., 2012), renal disease (Cho et al., 2009), and Parkinson's disease (Fu et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2015). Together, these findings indicated that GPR109A has the ability to inhibit inflammation in various diseases. In particular, studies have reported that the GPR109A receptor mediates the protective effects of dietary fiber on gut homeostasis through regulation of the inflammasome in dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced mice (Macia et al., 2015) and suppresses colonic inflammation and tumorigenesis in mice (Singh et al., 2014; Thangaraju et al., 2009). However, the mechanism underlying GPR109A mediation of the process by which butyric acid inhibits inflammation and maintains epithelial barrier integrity in inflammatory bowel disease has not yet been elucidated.Butyrate, which is produced by bowel microbial fermentation of dietary carbohydrates, fibers, proteins, and peptides (Guilloteau et al., 2010; Leonel and Alvarez-Leite, 2012; Macfarlane and Macfarlane, 2003), serves as the energy source of small intestinal epithelial cells (Chen et al., 2015), thus stimulating their growth (Guilloteau et al., 2010). In this study, mice (in vivo) and cells (in vitro) were pre-treated with sodium butyrate (SB), a ligand of GPR109A, to explore the anti-inflammatory effects and functional mechanism of the GPR109A receptor.
Materials and Methods
Animals and Models
For all experiments, we utilized 6–8-week-old male GPR109a and wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 mice. The GPR109a is whole body KO which was a generous gift form Dr. Martin Sager (Zentrale Einrichtung für Tierforschung und Tierschutzaufgaben der Heinrich-Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Germany). The WT mice were provided by the Centre of Experimental Animals of the Baiqiuen Medical College of Jilin University (Changchun, China). Mice were housed at 22–23 °C, with a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle, and ad libitum access to food and water. The experiments were approved by the Jilin University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. For the 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS) model, colitis was induced by intracolonic administration of TNBS, as previously described (Piekielna et al., 2012). Briefly, mice were lightly anesthetized via inhalation of diethyl ether. Then, 3.5 mg of TNBS in the 100 μL of 30% ethanol solution was administered into the colon through a catheter inserted approximately 3 cm into the anus.
Experimental Groups
Mice were randomly assigned to six groups, each containing 14 mice. Sham-WT and Sham-GPR109a were used as the normal control groups, TNBS-WT, and TNBS-GPR109a comprised the TNBS treatment groups, and SB-TNBS-WT and SB-TNBS-GPR109a included mice that were first administered SB via their drinking water for 6 weeks before being treated with TNBS.
Disease Activity Index
During the experiment, body weight, stool character and fecal occult blood were recorded. The disease activity index (DAI) was calculated based on the scoring system as shown in Table 1 as previously described (Murano et al., 2000).
Table 1
Primers used for qRT-PCR.
Gene
Primer sequence
Tnfa
F:5′-GCAACTGCTGCACGAAATC-3′
R:5′-CTGCTTGTCCTCTGCCCAC-3′
Il6
F:5′-CCAGAAACCGCTATGAAGTTCC-3′
R:5′-GTTGGGAGTGGTATCCTCTGTGA-3′
Cldn1 (mou)
F:5′-AGGTCTGGCGACATTAGTGG-3′
R:5′-CGTGGTGTTGGGTAAGAGGT-3′
Ocln (mou)
F:5′-ACACTTGCTTGGGACAGAGG-3′
R:5′-AAGGAAGCGATGAAGCAGAA-3′
Zo1 (mou)
F: 5′-GACCTTGATTTGCATGACGA-3′
R: 5′-AGGACCGTGTAATGGCAGAC-3’
CLDN1 (hum)
F: 5′-CCCTTTGATCCCTACCAACA-3′
R: 5′-CAGGACAGGAACAGGAGAGC-3′
OCLN (hum)
F: 5′-ATGGCTGCCTTTTGTTTCAT-3′
R: 5′-ATGCCCAGGATAGCACTCAC-3′
ZO1 (hum)
F: 5′-CTCCTGGATTTGGATTTGGA-3′
R: 5′-CTGTCCTTCAGCTGGTCCTC-3′
β-actin (mou)
F: 5′-GTCAGGTCATCACTATCGGCAAT-3′
R: 5′AGAGGTCTTTACGGATGTCAACGT-3′
GAPDH (hum)
F: 5′-CTCCTGGATTTGGATTTGGA-3′
R: 5′-CTGTCCTTCAGCTGGTCCTC-3’
Primers used for qRT-PCR.
Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-Staining and Immunofluorescence
Colonic segments (approximately 2–3 cm long) were excised, washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), fixed in 4% formaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned (5 μm). One set of paraffin sections was stained with H&E, and the total damage score was determined based on the goblet cell depletion (presence = 1, absence = 0), crypt abscesses (presence = 1, absence = 0), mucosal architecture destruction (normal = 1, moderate = 2, extensive = 3), muscle thickening (normal = 1, moderate = 2, extensive = 3), and cellular infiltration (normal = 1, moderate = 2, transmural = 3). The remaining sections were used for immunofluorescence; detailed procedures can be found in Schaubeck et al. (2016). Briefly, antigens were unmasked by boiling under pressure in sodium citrate buffer. Sections were cooled to room temperature (approximately 25 °C) naturally, then washed three times (5 min each time) with PBS. Sections were then incubated with a blocking buffer (5% donkey serum and 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS) against the species of the secondary antibody for 60 min. Primary antibodies were incubated at 4 °C overnight, and then washed three times with PBS. Secondary antibodies were diluted to 1:1000, incubated for 1 h at room temperature, and then washed three times in PBS. Nuclei were counterstained using DAPI.
In vivo Intestinal Permeability Assay
Intestinal permeability was evaluated using fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran with an average molecular weight of 3000–5000 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), as previously described (Jeong et al., 2016). Briefly, 2 days after TNBS treatment, mice were starved for 4 h and then gavaged with FITC-dextran (0.6 mg/g body weight at a concentration of 125 mg/mL). After 4 h, blood was collected from the eyes of the mice and centrifuged at 12,000g for 3 min. The FITC-dextran content in serum was determined using a microplate reader with excitation and emission wavelengths of 490 and 525 nm, respectively. Each sample was measured in triplicate.
Cell Culture
Caco-2 cells and RAW246.7 macrophages, purchased from BeNa Culture Collection (Beijing, China), were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Clark, Australia) and were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified chamber of 5% CO2.The mice were intraperitoneally injected with 4 mL of 3% thioglycollate broth. After three days, the mice were sacrificed and then each mouse was injected with 4 mL RPMI 1640 into the peritoneal cavity. The peritoneal lavage fluid was collected and centrifuged at 300g for 5 min. The supernatant was removed and the cells were re-suspended in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO2. After 2 h, non-adherent cells were discarded. The remaining adherent cells were cultured overnight until they were used for the experiments.
Trans Epithelial Electric Resistance
The Caco-2 cells were seeded in Transwell cell culture chambers (6.5-mm diameter inserts, 3.0 μm pore size) (Corning Costar, Cambridge, MA) and cultured for 11 days to form a cell monolayer. Then, RAW246.7 macrophages were seeded in the bottom of the well. After three days, the RAW246.7 macrophages were pre-treated with SB (5 mM) for 1 h and then stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (1 μg/mL) for 24 h, as shown in Fig. 5A. The complete medium was replaced with serum free medium and incubated for 20 min, and then the TEER value was measured using a resistor:Where R is the resistance of the cell monolayer along with the filter membrane, RB is the resistance of the filter membrane (black), and Surface Area = (0.65 cm ÷ 2)2 × 3.14 = 0.332 cm2.
Fig. 5
SB maintains a proper intestinal epithelium barrier by inhibiting the inflammatory response of macrophages.
(A) Schematic diagram of the testing process of TEER. (B) TEER of various treatments of the Caco-2 monolayer (n = 3). (C) Schematic diagram of Caco-2 cell and RAW246.7 macrophage co-culture. (D-E) Expression of the tight junction genes Cldn1, Ocln, and Zo1 of Caco-2 cells (n = 3).
Cell Co-Culture
The RAW246.7 macrophages and Caco-2 cells were seeded in 6-well plates and cultured for 48 h. Then, the RAW246.7 macrophages were stimulated with LPS for 12 h. The medium supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 10 min to remove cell debris. The collected medium supernatant was used to stimulate the Caco-2 cells for 12 h, as shown in Fig. 5C. The Caco-2 cells were collected to measure the expression of the tight junction encoding genes claudin-1 (Cldn1), occludin (Ocln), and Zo1 using qRT-PCR.
RNA Extraction, Complementary DNA (cDNA) Preparation, and Real-time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from the colon tissue, RAW246.7 macrophages, Caco-2 cells, and primary peritoneal macrophages using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and cDNA was generated using a commercial RT-PCR kit (TaKaRa Shuzo Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan). Then, real-time PCR was conducted using the SYBR Green QuantiTect RT-PCR kit (Roche, South San Francisco, CA), and each of the samples was analyzed in triplicate. The sequences of the primers used in this investigation are shown in Table 1.
Western Blotting
RAW246.7 cells and primary peritoneal macrophages were treated with SB (5 mM) for 1 h, and treated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 2 h. Then, the cells were lysed with a lysis buffer (Beyotime Inst. Biotech, Beijing, China). The protein concentrations in the supernatants were quantified using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Beyotime Inst. Biotech), and 30 μg of protein was resolved by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to immunoblot polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA). The membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween (TBS-T) for 1 h, washed four times in TBS-T, followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C with primary antibodies against p-p38 (1:2000), p-38 (1:2000), p-JNK1/2 (1:2000), JNK1/2 (1:2000), p-ERK1/2 (1:2000), ERK1/2 (1:2000), p-AKT (1:2000), AKT (1:2000), p-NF-κB p65 (1:2000), NF-κB p65 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), and β-actin (1:2000) (Santa Cruz Technologies, Dallas, TX). Then, the membranes were again washed four times with TBS-T (15 min each time) and incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary goat anti-rabbit (1:2000; Santa Cruz Technologies) or rabbit anti-goat (1:2000; Santa Cruz Technologies) antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Next, the blots were washed again four times with TBS-T (15 min each time). Membranes were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL kit; Applygen Inst. Biotech, Beijing, China).
Statistics
Results are expressed as the means ± SE. Data were analyzed using the statistical software package SPSS 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Groups were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the least significant difference test. *P < 0.05 was considered significant, and **P < 0.01 was considered markedly significant.
Results
SB Ameliorates Survival, Weight Loss, Colon Length, and Clinical Scores in a TNBS-Induced Mouse IBD Model
Initially, to define whether SB has a protective role in colitis in vivo, a series of indices were measured in TNBS-induced mice. First, we tested the survival of TNBS-induced WT and GPR109amice and found no significant difference. Pre-treatment with SB for 2 months observably improved the WT mouse survival rate; however, the effect was not observed in GPR109amice (Fig. 1A). Next, we measured the weight loss (initial weight − real time weight) and found that TNBS decreased the weight of WT and GPR109amice, whereas SB increased the body weight of WT mice but had no effect on GPR109amice (Fig. 1B). TNBS decreased the colon length in WT and GPR109amice, whereas pre-treatment with SB increased the colon length in WT mice but not in GPR109amice (Fig. 1C). Lastly, we found that TNBS significantly increased the disease activity index in WT and GPR109amice, and SB decreased the disease activity index in WT mice (Fig. 1D). Together, these results indicated that SB plays a GPR109A-dependent protective role in TNBS-induced colitis.
Fig. 1
SB ameliorates survival, weight loss, colon length, and disease activity index in the TNBS-induced mouse IBD model. WT and GPR109a mice were pre-treated with SB for 6 weeks and then treated with TNBS for 6 days. (A) Survival of TNBS- and SB-treated WT and GPR109amice (n = 14). (B) Weight loss (the previous day's body weight – the day's body weight) in TNBS- and SB-treated WT and GPR109amice (n = 8–12). (C) Colon length in TNBS- and SB-treated WT and GPR109a mice (n = 8–12). (D) Disease activity index of TNBS- and SB-treated WT and GPR109amice (n = 8–12).
SB ameliorates survival, weight loss, colon length, and disease activity index in the TNBS-induced mouse IBD model. WT and GPR109amice were pre-treated with SB for 6 weeks and then treated with TNBS for 6 days. (A) Survival of TNBS- and SB-treated WT and GPR109amice (n = 14). (B) Weight loss (the previous day's body weight – the day's body weight) in TNBS- and SB-treated WT and GPR109amice (n = 8–12). (C) Colon length in TNBS- and SB-treated WT and GPR109amice (n = 8–12). (D) Disease activity index of TNBS- and SB-treated WT and GPR109amice (n = 8–12).
SB Suppresses Inflammation in TNBS-Induced Mice
The qRT-PCR results showed that TNBS significantly increased the expression of TNF-α and IL-1β in colon tissue homogenates of WT and GPR109amice; however, pre-treatment with SB strikingly decreased their expression in WT but not in GPR109amice (Fig. 2 A,B). Evaluation of the severity of colonic inflammation and ulceration by histopathological examination showed marked infiltration of inflammatory cells, loss of crypts, destruction of the mucosal layer, and edema in TNBS-induced WT and GPR109amice. In contrast, the colons of WT mice pre-treated with SB showed only mild inflammation; however, SB had no effects on TNBS-induced GPR109amice (Fig. 2C). The protective effects of SB on TNBS-induced mice were also observed in total damage score (Fig. 2D). The results indicated that SB suppressed the inflammation in TNBS-induced mice in a GPR109A-dependent manner.
Fig. 2
SB suppresses the inflammation in TNBS-induced mice.
(A-B) Expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 in colon tissue homogenate (n = 4). (C) H&E staining of colon tissue from TNBS- and SB-treated WT and GPR109amice, magnification shown is 4 ×, and the scale bar represents 100 μm (n = 4). (D) Total damage score of TNBS- and SB-treated WT and GPR109a mice (n = 8–12).
SB suppresses the inflammation in TNBS-induced mice.(A-B) Expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 in colon tissue homogenate (n = 4). (C) H&E staining of colon tissue from TNBS- and SB-treated WT and GPR109amice, magnification shown is 4 ×, and the scale bar represents 100 μm (n = 4). (D) Total damage score of TNBS- and SB-treated WT and GPR109amice (n = 8–12).
SB Reduces the Permeability and Maintains Proper Tight Junctions and Mucin-2 in TNBS-Induced Mice
SB decreased the intestinal permeability in TNBS-induced WT mice; however, SB had no effects in TNBS-induced GPR109amice (Fig. 3A). qRT-PCR assessment of Cldn1, Zo1, and Ocln mRNA expression showed that their expression was reduced in TNBS-induced WT and GPR109amice, whereas supplementation with SB precluded this effect in TNBS-induced WT but not GPR109amice (Fig. 3C-E). Immunofluorescence-mediated examination of mucin-2 (MUC2) protein expression showed that MUC2 was reduced in both TNBS-induced WT and GPR109amice. WT mice maintained proper MUC2 protein expression when supplemented with SB, but no improvement was observed in GPR109amice (Fig. 3B). Together, these results indicated that SB reduced the permeability and maintained proper tight junctions and mucin-2 by activating GPR109A in TNBS-induced mice.
Fig. 3
SB reduces the permeability and maintains proper tight junctions and mucin-2 in TNBS-induced mice.
All mice were pre-treated with SB for 6 weeks, and then treated with TNBS for 2 days. (A) Relative permeability of TNBS and SB treatment in WT and GPR109a mice. After treating with SB and TNBS, the mice were starved for 4 h and then gavaged with FITC-dextran (0.6 mg/g body weight at a concentration of 125 mg/mL). Serum from blood collected after 4 h was used to measure the permeability (n = 4). (B) Immunofluorescence staining of Muc2 in the colon; magnification shown is 10 ×, and the scale bar represents 300 μm (n = 4). (C-E) Expression of the tight junction encoding genes Cldn1, Ocln, and Zo1 in the colon tissue homogenate of TNBS- and SB-treated WT and GPR109a mice (n = 4).
SB reduces the permeability and maintains proper tight junctions and mucin-2 in TNBS-induced mice.All mice were pre-treated with SB for 6 weeks, and then treated with TNBS for 2 days. (A) Relative permeability of TNBS and SB treatment in WT and GPR109amice. After treating with SB and TNBS, the mice were starved for 4 h and then gavaged with FITC-dextran (0.6 mg/g body weight at a concentration of 125 mg/mL). Serum from blood collected after 4 h was used to measure the permeability (n = 4). (B) Immunofluorescence staining of Muc2 in the colon; magnification shown is 10 ×, and the scale bar represents 300 μm (n = 4). (C-E) Expression of the tight junction encoding genes Cldn1, Ocln, and Zo1 in the colon tissue homogenate of TNBS- and SB-treated WT and GPR109amice (n = 4).
SB Suppresses Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Expression in LPS-Induced Macrophages
qRT-PCR assessment of in vitro pro-inflammatory cytokine expression showed that TNF-α and IL-6 expression increased in 6-h-LPS-induced RAW246.7 cells. However, pre-treatment with SB sharply decreased the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators (Fig. 4A, B). In comparison, ELISA measurement of the levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines in the supernatant of 12-h-LPS-induced RAW246.7 cells showed that SB pretreatment markedly inhibited the release of TNF-α and IL-6 (Fig. 4C, D).
Fig. 4
SB suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in LPS-induced macrophages.
(A-B) Expression of TNF-α and IL-6 in SB- and LPS-treated RAW246.7 cells. RAW246.7 macrophages were stimulated with LPS for 6 h after pre-treating with SB for 1 h, and then the cells were collected with TRIzol. Gene expression of TNF-α and IL-6 was detected by qRT-PCR (n = 3). (C-D) Protein levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in the medium supernatant of SB- and LPS-treated RAW246.7 macrophages. RAW246.7 macrophages were pre-treated with SB for 1 h, and then stimulated with LPS for 12 h. The medium supernatant was collected and used for measuring the protein levels of TNF-α and IL-6 by ELISA (n = 3).
SB suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in LPS-induced macrophages.(A-B) Expression of TNF-α and IL-6 in SB- and LPS-treated RAW246.7 cells. RAW246.7 macrophages were stimulated with LPS for 6 h after pre-treating with SB for 1 h, and then the cells were collected with TRIzol. Gene expression of TNF-α and IL-6 was detected by qRT-PCR (n = 3). (C-D) Protein levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in the medium supernatant of SB- and LPS-treated RAW246.7 macrophages. RAW246.7 macrophages were pre-treated with SB for 1 h, and then stimulated with LPS for 12 h. The medium supernatant was collected and used for measuring the protein levels of TNF-α and IL-6 by ELISA (n = 3).
SB Maintains a Proper Intestinal Epithelium Barrier by Inhibiting the Inflammatory Response of Macrophages
To investigate the protective role of SB on the intestinal epithelium barrier in vitro, we simulated the intestinal physiological environment by culturing Caco-2 and RAW 246.7 cells together in a Transwell® plate (Fig. 5A). The results showed that LPS significantly decreased the resistance of the monolayer, whereas pre-treating with SB observably inhibited this reducing effect (Fig. 5B). Next, we also performed a co-culture experiment to confirm whether the protective effects of SB on the intestinal epithelium barrier occurred by inhibiting the inflammatory response of macrophages. The results showed that the medium supernatant of LPS-stimulated but not SB plus LPS-treated RAW246.7 macrophages significantly decreased the expression of Cldn1, Zo1, and Ocln (Fig. 5 C-F). Together, the results indicated that SB maintained the proper epithelium barrier by inhibiting the secretion of pro-inflammatory mediators from macrophages.SB maintains a proper intestinal epithelium barrier by inhibiting the inflammatory response of macrophages.(A) Schematic diagram of the testing process of TEER. (B) TEER of various treatments of the Caco-2 monolayer (n = 3). (C) Schematic diagram of Caco-2 cell and RAW246.7 macrophage co-culture. (D-E) Expression of the tight junction genes Cldn1, Ocln, and Zo1 of Caco-2 cells (n = 3).
SB Suppresses LPS-Induced Phosphorylation of the AKT and NF-κB p65 Signaling Pathways in Macrophages
LPS sharply improved the phosphorylation of p-38, JNK1/2, ERK1/2, AKT, and NF-κB p65 signaling pathways in RAW246.7 cells (Fig. 6A, E), whereas SB pre-treatment significantly inhibited the phosphorylation of AKT and NF-κB p65(Fig. F,G), but not p-38, JNK1/2, and ERK1/2 in LPS-induced RAW246.7 macrophages (Fig. 6B-D). SB also clearly inhibited the phosphorylation of AKT and NF-κB p65 in LPS-induced WT mouse primary peritoneal macrophages (Fig. 6H-J), but failed to inhibit this phenomenon in LPS-induced GPR109amouse primary peritoneal macrophages (Fig. 6K-M).
Fig. 6
SB suppresses LPS-induced phosphorylation of the AKT and NF-κB p65 signaling pathways in macrophages.
(A-G) Western blot analysis of the phosphorylation of the p38, ERK p-38, JNK1/2, ERK1/2, AKT, and NF-κB p65 signaling pathways in LPS-induced RAW246.7 macrophages (n = 3). (H-J) Western blot analysis of the phosphorylation of the AKT and NF-κB p65 signaling pathways in LPS-induced WT mouse primary peritoneal macrophages (n = 3). (K-M) Western blot analysis of the phosphorylation of the AKT and NF-κB p65 signaling pathways in LPS-induced GPR109amouse primary peritoneal macrophages (n = 3).
SB suppresses LPS-induced phosphorylation of the AKT and NF-κB p65 signaling pathways in macrophages.(A-G) Western blot analysis of the phosphorylation of the p38, ERKp-38, JNK1/2, ERK1/2, AKT, and NF-κB p65 signaling pathways in LPS-induced RAW246.7 macrophages (n = 3). (H-J) Western blot analysis of the phosphorylation of the AKT and NF-κB p65 signaling pathways in LPS-induced WT mouse primary peritoneal macrophages (n = 3). (K-M) Western blot analysis of the phosphorylation of the AKT and NF-κB p65 signaling pathways in LPS-induced GPR109amouse primary peritoneal macrophages (n = 3).
Discussion
A growing body of evidence suggests that the activation of GPR109A suppresses the inflammatory effects in various diseases (Rahman et al., 2014; Sivaprakasam et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2015). Additionally, previous studies showed that the activation of GPR109a inhibits the inflammation seen in IBD (Salem and Wadie, 2017; Singh et al., 2014). However, these reports all focused on the anti-inflammatory effects of GPR109a and ignored the potential protective effects of GPR109A on the impaired intestinal epithelium barrier. Butyrate is produced by the intestinal microbial fermentation of dietary carbohydrates, fiber, proteins, and peptides (Guilloteau et al., 2010; Leonel and Alvarez-Leite, 2012). SB has been reported to decrease post-weaning diarrhea by modulating intestinal permeability in weaned piglets (Huang et al., 2015), promoting the recovering of intestinal wound healing through its positive effect on the tight junctions (Ma et al., 2012) and butyrate-releasing derivatives maintain proper Zo1 and Ocln expression in the colons of patients with DSS-induced colitis (Simeoli et al., 2017). However, the effect of SB on impaired intestinal epithelium barriers is not clear. In the present study, we examined the anti-inflammatory property of SB; confirmed its potential protective roles on the impaired intestinal epithelium barrier in a TNBS-induced IBD mouse model; and explored its mechanism in RAW246.7 macrophages, Caco-2 cells, and primary peritoneal macrophages in vitro.Depressed survival rate, body weight, and colon length along with elevated clinical score comprise the essential characteristics of IBD (Hung et al., 2014; Shen et al., 2011; Sun et al., 2010). In the present study, we found that SB improved the survival rate, body weight, and colon length and decreased the clinical score in TNBS-induced WT mice, but had no effects on GPR109amice. We also found that supplementation with SB markedly inhibited the inflammatory response in TNBS-induced mice and LPS-induced macrophages. The results are consistent with previous reports that activation of the GPR109A receptor provides a protective effect on IBD (Macia et al., 2015; Singh et al., 2014).Dietary fiber exhibits multiple beneficial effects toward the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis, which are believed to be due to the fermentation of fibers by intestinal microbiota, resulting in the production of short-chain fatty acids such as acetate, propionate, and butyrate (Koh et al., 2016). Among the short-chain fatty acids, butyrate has attracted more attention, being shown to function as an energy source for coloncytes, to exhibit anti-inflammatory as well as immune modulatory effects, and to protect against intestinal cancer in a GPR109A-dependent manner (Koh et al., 2016; Leonel and Alvarez-Leite, 2012; Offermanns, 2017). Therefore, our results are consistent with those of previous studies wherein supplementation with fiber improves DSS- or TNBS-induced mousecolitis (Macia et al., 2015; Oppong et al., 2015), quite possibly in a GPR109A-dependent manner.The intestinal epithelium, among the most important interfaces between the body and the environment, not only plays a part in nutrient absorption but also acts as a barrier against the vast amount of commensal intestinal microorganisms and pathogenic microbes (Artis and Grencis, 2008; Peterson and Artis, 2014). Therefore, the integrity of the epithelial monolayer is critical for the health of the gut, and epithelial dysfunction is a hallmark of intestinal disorders such as IBDs (Citalan-Madrid et al., 2017; Worthington et al., 2017). In the TNBS-induced murinecolitis model, ethanol is essential for providing access to intestinal epithelial cells, impairing barrier function, and allowing TNBS to penetrate the bowel wall. TNBS constitutes a covalently reactive compound that attaches to autologous proteins and stimulates a delayed-type hypersensitivity response to hapten-modified self antigens, a reaction that involves and is regulated by complex interactions among various functional subsets of CD4+ T cells (Elson et al., 1996; Miller and Butler, 1983), subsequently leading to the inflammatory response of innate immune cells and further damage of the intestinal epithelium barrier. In the present study, we found that SB reduced the permeability of the intestine and maintained proper tight junctions and MUC2 in the colon of TNBS-induced WT mice. To further confirm these results, we examined the effects of SB on the epithelium barrier in vitro and found that SB sharply reduced the effects of LPS-induced RAW246.7 macrophages on the resistance of the Caco-2 cell monolayer, as well as maintained proper tight junctions. Together, these results indicated that SB maintained a proper intestinal epithelium barrier by activating GPR109A.A previous study indicated that GPR109a mediates the anti-inflammatory effect by inhibiting the phosphorylation of the NF-κB p65 signaling pathway (Fu et al., 2015; Zandi-Nejad et al., 2013). In the present study, to investigate the definite mechanism of SB on the inflammatory response, we examined the effects of SB on the classical inflammation pathways AKT, NF-κB, and MAPK and found that supplementation with SB markedly decreased the phosphorylation of AKT and NF-κB p65 in LPS-induced RAW246.7 cells and WT mouse primary peritoneal macrophages, but failed to suppress this phenomenon in GPR109amouse primary peritoneal macrophages. Previous studies indicated that supplementation with SB improved the phosphorylation of the AKT signaling pathway in high-fat diet–induced insulin resistance (Gao et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2017), elevated the phosphorylation of the AKT signaling pathway in the adipose tissue of obesemice (Guo et al., 2017), and inhibited platelet-derived growth factor-induced proliferation and migration in pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells through AKT inhibition (Cantoni et al., 2013). Therefore, the effects of SB on the AKT signaling pathway are not fixed; instead, they depend on the function of the AKT signaling pathway in different situations. Our results indicated that SB inhibited the phosphorylation of the AKT and NF-κB p65 signaling pathway in macrophages in a GPR109A-dependent manner.Fig. 7 summarizes the underlying mechanism of SB on inhibiting inflammation and maintaining epithelium barrier integrity in the TNBS-induced colitis model. Our findings not only explained the protective effect of SB on colon health, but also provided evidence that GPR109A likely constitutes a valid therapeutic target in IBD. Inhibition of macrophages by activating GPR109A thus may represent a novel approach to treat IBD.
Fig. 7
Mechanism of sodium butyrate on inhibiting inflammation and maintaining epithelium barrier integrity in the TNBS-induced colitis model.
Mechanism of sodium butyrate on inhibiting inflammation and maintaining epithelium barrier integrity in the TNBS-induced colitis model.
Authors: Pearl Choi; Lamya Rhayat; Eric Pinloche; Estelle Devillard; Ellen De Paepe; Lynn Vanhaecke; Freddy Haesebrouck; Richard Ducatelle; Filip Van Immerseel; Evy Goossens Journal: Animals (Basel) Date: 2021-05-08 Impact factor: 2.752