Literature DB >> 29627256

Patients With Poor Baseline Mental Health Undergoing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Have Poorer Outcomes.

Graham Seow-Hng Goh1, Ming Han Lincoln Liow1, Hee-Nee Pang1, Darren Keng-Jin Tay1, Ngai-Nung Lo1, Seng-Jin Yeo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between mental health and outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains unclear. Poor preoperative mental health may be caused by pain and functional limitations associated with knee arthritis. We aimed at (1) investigating the effect of preoperative mental health on early outcomes and (2) assessing whether mental health improves after UKA.
METHODS: Prospectively collected registry data of 1473 medial UKAs performed at a single institution in 2007-2014 were reviewed. Linear regression was used to determine improvement in mental health up to 2 years according to preoperative Short-Form 36 Mental Component Summary (MCS). Patients were stratified into low MCS (<50, n = 579) and high MCS (≥50, n = 894). The Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Function Score (KSFS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Short-Form 36, satisfaction, and expectation fulfilment were compared at 6 months and 2 years.
RESULTS: The mean preoperative MCS was 41.2 in low MCS group and 58.6 in high MCS group (P < .001). The high MCS group had higher KSKS, KSFS, OKS, and Physical Component Summary, and a greater proportion of patients were satisfied and had expectations fulfilled at 6 months and 2 years (P < .05). However, the low MCS group demonstrated greater improvement in KSKS, KSFS, and OKS (P < .05). Lower preoperative MCS score was predictive of greater improvement in MCS (coefficient = -0.662, R = -0.602, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Patients with poor mental health benefit from greater improvements in their mental health and knee function after UKA, but also have a greater dissatisfaction.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SF-36; knee arthroplasty; mental health; outcomes; satisfaction; unicompartmental

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29627256     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  3 in total

1.  [Comparison of the effectiveness of unicompartmental arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty based on patient scale data].

Authors:  Xiangyu Zu; Jun Wang; Ming Lu; Zongsheng Yin
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-12-15

2.  Greater activity, better range of motion and higher quality of life following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparative case-control study.

Authors:  Georg Hauer; Patrick Sadoghi; Gerwin A Bernhardt; Matthias Wolf; Paul Ruckenstuhl; Andrea Fink; Andreas Leithner; Gerald Gruber
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Factors affecting the clinical outcomes including patient satisfaction after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yang Chen; Xinyu Fang; Zida Huang; Wenbo Li; Wenming Zhang
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-07-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.