Literature DB >> 29626277

Evaluation of Fecal M2PK as a Diagnostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer.

Hisham K Dabbous1, Yosry Abd El-Rahman Mohamed2, Runia F El-Folly1, Mohamed D El-Talkawy2, Hani E Seddik2, Dina Johar3,4, Mohammed A Sarhan5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Invasive colonoscopy is the gold standard for patients at risk for colorectal cancer. However, the need for non-invasive and specific markers is required.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity of the glycolytic pyruvate kinase isoenzyme type M2 dimer (M2PK) as a diagnostic biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC) and adenomatous colorectal polyps (CRP) screening.
DESIGN: Case-control. PATIENTS: Twenty patients with CRC, 20 patients with CRP (lack criteria for colonic cancer by biopsy), and 20 normal subjects. OUTCOME: Complete blood count (CBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), tumor markers: carcino embryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), fecal occult blood test (FOBT), and fecal M2PK. Pelvic and abdominal ultrasound (US), colonoscopy, and a histopathological examination.
RESULTS: Only weight loss and cachexia were significantly associated with CRC than CRP or control groups. M2PK was the most sensitive and specific test in differentiating CRC from CRP and the control subjects (sensitivity = 75%, specificity = 100%). LIMITATIONS: (1) The selection of cases for three well-matched groups, as to perform colonoscopy in well-prepared cases and conditions. (2) Replicates in more than 20 cases for confirmation at the expense of enrolling new patients. (3) The cost associated with tumor markers analysis.
CONCLUSION: Fecal M2PK can be used as a precolonoscopy screening test for CRC patients, and is superior to other tumor markers, and in indicating the progress of colorectal adenomas > 1 cm. Thus being cost-effective and easy-to-perform test, it is a feasible tool to preselect patients who require colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Colorectal polyp; Egypt; Fecal occult blood test; Marker; Patients

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29626277     DOI: 10.1007/s12029-018-0088-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer


  22 in total

1.  The cyanmethemoglobin method for hemoglobin determination.

Authors:  D S AMATUZIO; F GRANDE; S WADA
Journal:  Minn Med       Date:  1962-04

Review 2.  Screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2005-07

Review 3.  Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; David F Ransohoff; Steven H Itzkowitz; Barry A Turnbull; Michael E Ross
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Faecal dimeric M2 pyruvate kinase in colorectal cancer and polyps correlates with tumour staging and surgical intervention.

Authors:  K Koss; D Maxton; J A Z Jankowski
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 6.  Carcinoembryonic antigen screening: pros and cons.

Authors:  J S Macdonald
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  Identification of S100A8 and S100A9 as serological markers for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hye-Jung Kim; Hyun Ju Kang; Hanna Lee; Seung-Taek Lee; Myeong-Hee Yu; Hoguen Kim; Cheolju Lee
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2007: a review of current guidelines, practices, and prospects.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Harmon J Eyre
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of plasma tumor M2 pyruvate kinase in periampullary cancer: evidence for a novel biological marker of adverse prognosis.

Authors:  Kolitha S Goonetilleke; James M Mason; Priyantha Siriwardana; Nicholas K King; Michael W France; Ajith K Siriwardena
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.327

10.  The diagnosis of colorectal cancer in patients with symptoms: finding a needle in a haystack.

Authors:  Robert H Fletcher
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comprehensive aptamer-based screen of 1317 proteins uncovers improved stool protein markers of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hao Li; Kamala Vanarsa; Ting Zhang; Sanam Soomro; Pietro Antonio Cicalese; Valeria Duran; Shobha Dasari; Kyung Hyun Lee; Claudia Pedroza; John B Kisiel; Huanlong Qin; Robert S Bresalier; Nicholas Chia; Chandra Mohan
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Expression of tumor pyruvate kinase M2 isoform in plasma and stool of patients with colorectal cancer or adenomatous polyps.

Authors:  Farideh Rigi; Aliakbar Jannatabad; Azra Izanloo; Reza Roshanravan; Hamid Reza Hashemian; Mohammad Amin Kerachian
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Comparison of faecal protein biomarkers' diagnostic accuracy for colorectal advanced neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Atefeh Nasir Kansestani; Mohammad Erfan Zare; Qingchao Tong; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Lateral Flow Immunoassay Based on Time-Resolved Fluorescence Microspheres for Rapid and Quantitative Screening CA199 in Human Serum.

Authors:  Xueshima Jiao; Tao Peng; Zhanwei Liang; Yalin Hu; Bo Meng; Yang Zhao; Jie Xie; Xiaoyun Gong; You Jiang; Xiang Fang; Xiaoping Yu; Xinhua Dai
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 5.  Fecal biomarkers: Non-invasive diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Qian Ding; Xiangxu Kong; Weilong Zhong; Wentian Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 5.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.