| Literature DB >> 29626130 |
Philipp H Schiffer1, Avital L Polsky2, Alison G Cole3, Julia I R Camps4, Michael Kroiher5, David H Silver2, Vladislav Grishkevich2, Leon Anavy2, Georgios Koutsovoulos6, Tamar Hashimshony2, Itai Yanai7.
Abstract
The evolution of development has been studied through the lens of gene regulation by examining either closely related species or extremely distant animals of different phyla. In nematodes, detailed cell- and stage-specific expression analyses are focused on the model Caenorhabditis elegans, in part leading to the view that the developmental expression of gene cascades in this species is archetypic for the phylum. Here, we compared two species of an intermediate evolutionary distance: the nematodes C. elegans (clade V) and Acrobeloides nanus (clade IV). To examine A. nanus molecularly, we sequenced its genome and identified the expression profiles of all genes throughout embryogenesis. In comparison with C. elegans, A. nanus exhibits a much slower embryonic development and has a capacity for regulative compensation of missing early cells. We detected conserved stages between these species at the transcriptome level, as well as a prominent middevelopmental transition, at which point the two species converge in terms of their gene expression. Interestingly, we found that genes originating at the dawn of the Ecdysozoa supergroup show the least expression divergence between these two species. This led us to detect a correlation between the time of expression of a gene and its phylogenetic age: evolutionarily ancient and young genes are enriched for expression in early and late embryogenesis, respectively, whereas Ecdysozoa-specific genes are enriched for expression during the middevelopmental transition. Our results characterize the developmental constraints operating on each individual embryo in terms of developmental stages and genetic evolutionary history.Entities:
Keywords: Nematoda; development; developmental constraints; evolution; gene expression
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29626130 PMCID: PMC5924915 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1720817115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205