| Literature DB >> 29626049 |
Yu Shi1, Hui Guo2, Shue Zhang3, Fengzhe Xie1, Jinghui Wang1, Zhinan Sun4, Xinpeng Dong5, Tao Sun1, Lihua Fan1.
Abstract
This study had three objectives: (1) to investigate the impact of workplace incivility on job burn-out of new nursing staff, (2) to verify the partial mediating role of anxiety in the relationship between workplace incivility and job burn-out, (3) to examine the resilience moderating the relations between workplace incivility and job burn-out.Entities:
Keywords: anxiety; job burnout; new nurses; resilience; workplace incivility
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29626049 PMCID: PMC5892738 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020461
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1The conceptual framework of study.
Characteristics of the respondents (n=696)
| Characteristic | Classes | N | % | Mean±SD |
| Age | 19–29 | 672 | 96.55 | 24.55±2.10 |
| 30–35 | 24 | 3.45 | ||
| Gender | Male | 67 | 9.60 | – |
| Female | 629 | 90.40 | ||
| Marital status | Unmarried | 594 | 85.34 | – |
| Married | 99 | 14.22 | ||
| Other | 3 | 0.44 | ||
| Hospital level | Tertiary hospitals | 580 | 83.30 | – |
| The secondary hospital | 90 | 12.90 | ||
| First-level hospital | 26 | 3.70 | ||
| Education level | Secondary or below | 17 | 2.40 | – |
| Associate degree | 253 | 36.35 | ||
| Bachelor or above | 426 | 61.20 | ||
| Service years | 0–1 year | 357 | 51.29 | 1.71±0.81 |
| 1–2 years | 181 | 26.01 | ||
| 2–3 years | 158 | 22.70 | ||
| Distribution department | Rotation | 102 | 14.66 | – |
| Internal medicine | 165 | 23.70 | ||
| Surgery | 178 | 25.57 | ||
| Emergency | 3 | 0.44 | ||
| Medical technology | 25 | 3.59 | ||
| Outpatient service | 30 | 4.31 | ||
| Gynaecology | 41 | 5.89 | ||
| Paediatrics | 29 | 4.17 | ||
| Others | 123 | 17.67 |
The means, SD, Pearson’s correlation coefficient and reliability coefficient of variables
| Variables | M | SD | α | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Workplace incivility | 1.893 | 0.532 | 0.893 | |||
| Anxiety | 2.770 | 0.862 | – | 0.371* | – | |
| Resilience | 3.515 | 0.812 | 0.797 | −0.191* | −0.240* | – |
| Job burn-out | 3.194 | 0.841 |
| 0.238* | 0.436* | −0.026* |
*P<0.01; Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two tailed).
α, Cronbach’s alpha; M, mean.
Hierarchical linear regression models of variables
| Variables | Anxiety | Job burn-out | ||||||
| M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M5 | M6 | M7 | M8 | |
| Control variables | ||||||||
| Age | −0.012 | −0.019 | 0.027 | 0.033 | 0.023 | 0.031 | 0.022 | 0.023 |
| Gender | −0.085 | −0.094** | 0.005 | 0.042 | −0.001 | 0.037 | 0.000 | −0.002 |
| Hospital level | −0.102** | 0.087 | −0.034 | 0.011 | −0.024 | 0.011 | −0.023 | −0.025 |
| Service years | 0.067 | 0.084 | 0.092 | 0.062 | 0.103 | 0.069 | 0.106** | 0.106** |
| Education level | 0.107** | 0.064 | 0.041 | −0.006 | 0.012 | −0.014 | 0.012 | 0.017 |
| Department distribution | −0.004 | −0.006 | −0.011 | −0.01 | −0.013 | −0.011 | −0.014 | −0.014 |
| Cause variable | ||||||||
| Workplace incivility | 0.364** | 0.240** | 0.093** | 0.242** | 0.724** | |||
| Mediating variable | ||||||||
| Anxiety | 0.440** | 0.405** | ||||||
| Moderating variable | ||||||||
| Resilience | 0.020 | 0.400** | ||||||
| Incivility resilience* | −0.564** | |||||||
| F | 4.217** | 19.379** | 1.543 | 24.535** | 7.367** | 22.426** | 21.003** | 17.095** |
| R2 | 0.035** | 0.165** | 0.013 | 0.200** | 0.070** | 0.207** | 0.057** | 0.069** |
| ∆R2 | 0.027** | 0.156** | 0.005 | 0.192** | 0.060** | 0.198** | 0.054** | 0.065** |
M1: explains the influence of demographic variables on anxiety.
M2: explains the influence of workplace incivility on anxiety.
M3: explains the influence of demographic variables on job burn-out.
M4: explains the influence of anxiety on job burn-out.
M5: explains the influence of workplace incivility on job burn-out.
M6: explains the influence of workplace incivility on job burn-out after bringing into the explanatory power of anxiety.
M7: explains the influence of workplace incivility on job burn-out after bringing into the explanatory power of resilience.
M8: explains the influence of workplace incivility on job burn-out after bringing into the explanatory power of resilience and resilience Interaction.
*P<0.05; **P< 0.01.
Figure 2Effect of moderation.