Juan Yun1, Tong Xiao1, Lei Zhou2,3,4, Roger W Beuerman2,3,4, Juanjuan Li1,5, Yuan Zhao6, Amir Hadayer1, Xiaomin Zhang7, Deming Sun8, Henry J Kaplan1, Hui Shao1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kentucky Lions Eye Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States. 2. Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 4. Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Academic Clinical Research Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, The 2nd People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China. 6. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sullivan University College of Pharmacy, Louisville, Kentucky, United States. 7. Department of Uveitis & Ocular Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Eye Institute & School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, Tianjin, China. 8. Doheny Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the role of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in recurrent experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU). Methods: Recurrent EAU was induced in Lewis rats by interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) R16-peptide specific T cells (tEAU). Aqueous humor and serum samples were kinetically collected and DAMPs examined by quantitative proteomics, Western blot analysis, and ELISA. tEAU rats were treated with S100 inhibitor paquinimod followed by disease evaluation. The functions of T effector cells and T regulatory cells (Tregs) were compared between treated and nontreated groups. The expression of costimulatory molecules on antigen-presenting cells was examined by flow cytometry. Results: S100A8, but not high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), in the eye was found to be correlated with intraocular inflammatory episodes. Administration of paquinimod significantly protected tEAU rats from recurrence. Treated tEAU rats had fewer R16-specific Th1 and Th17 cells, but increased numbers of Tregs. R16-specific T cells from treated tEAU rats into naïve recipients prevented induction of tEAU by R16-specific T cells from nontreated tEAU rats. Moreover, APCs from treated tEAU rats expressed higher levels of a negative costimulatory molecule, CD200R, and lower levels of CD80, CD86, and MHC class II molecules compared to APCs from nontreated tEAU rats. An opposite pattern of expression of these molecules was observed on APCs incubated in vitro with recombinant S100A8. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate a link between local expression of DAMPs and autoimmune responses, and suggest that complete S100A8/A9 blockade may be a new therapeutic target in recurrent autoimmune uveitis.
Purpose: To investigate the role of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in recurrent experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU). Methods: Recurrent EAU was induced in Lewis rats by interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) R16-peptide specific T cells (tEAU). Aqueous humor and serum samples were kinetically collected and DAMPs examined by quantitative proteomics, Western blot analysis, and ELISA. tEAUrats were treated with S100 inhibitor paquinimod followed by disease evaluation. The functions of T effector cells and T regulatory cells (Tregs) were compared between treated and nontreated groups. The expression of costimulatory molecules on antigen-presenting cells was examined by flow cytometry. Results:S100A8, but not high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), in the eye was found to be correlated with intraocular inflammatory episodes. Administration of paquinimod significantly protected tEAUrats from recurrence. Treated tEAUrats had fewer R16-specific Th1 and Th17 cells, but increased numbers of Tregs. R16-specific T cells from treated tEAUrats into naïve recipients prevented induction of tEAU by R16-specific T cells from nontreated tEAUrats. Moreover, APCs from treated tEAUrats expressed higher levels of a negative costimulatory molecule, CD200R, and lower levels of CD80, CD86, and MHC class II molecules compared to APCs from nontreated tEAUrats. An opposite pattern of expression of these molecules was observed on APCs incubated in vitro with recombinant S100A8. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate a link between local expression of DAMPs and autoimmune responses, and suggest that complete S100A8/A9 blockade may be a new therapeutic target in recurrent autoimmune uveitis.
Autoimmune (idiopathic) uveitis in humans can be acute, chronic, or recurrent, in the last of which the intraocular inflammation shows relapses and remissions that vary in frequencies and timing. The complications caused by repeated inflammation and damage inside the eye, as well as by long-term drug treatment, lead to visual impairment, which accounts for approximately 10% of legal blindness in the Western world.[1] In studies using animal models of experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU), with characteristics of the human disease, it has been found that the disease is associated with activation of autoreactive T cells.[2] Adoptive transfer of activated T cells reactive with retinal antigens, such as interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP), induces chronic uveitis in mice[3] and recurrent uveitis in Lewis rats.[4,5] In the recurrent form of tEAU, the first episode of intraocular inflammation starts at day 4 and is followed by varying numbers of remissions. Similar to the clinical signs often seen in the human disease,[4] neither the duration of a single disease peak nor the interval between episodes is predictable; in addition, the right and left eyes of a single recipient often show a different rhythm of relapse. This tEAU model provides us with a useful tool for studying the regulation of pathogenic effector T cells in vivo during the course of the disease.A number of mechanisms may contribute to the remitting-relapsing character of the disease. Inter- and intramolecular spreading that shifts the immunoreactivity of T effector cells has been demonstrated in equine spontaneous recurrent uveitis[6] and recurrent autoimmune anterior uveitis in Lewis rats immunized with myelin basic protein.[7] We have previously reported that CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) make a significant contribution to controlling an ongoing inflammatory response in the eye and that dysregulation and malfunction of local Tregs is an important factor in disease recurrence, persistence, and progression.[8] In addition, we have found that ligation of exogenous or endogenous pathogen/damage-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs/DAMPs) to pathogen recognition receptors on intraocular parenchymal cells, such as astroglial cells, can reduce the threshold at which autoreactive T cells are activated in the eye.[9-11] Stimulation of astroglial cells with PAMPs/DAMPs increases the expression of MHC and costimulatory molecules and induces production of IL-6, IL-12, and IL-23, leading to the activation of Th1 and Th17 IRBP-specific T cells.[10] One of the major endogenous DAMPs, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), is immediately released as a consequence of the interaction of activated uveitogenic T cells with parenchymal cells.[12] HMGB1 promotes CXCL12 release from parenchymal cells, and the combination of HMGB1 and CXCL12 enhances leukocyte migration.[13] The recruitment of leukocytes, including T cells and monocytes, as well as the release of ocular antigens from damaged ocular tissues, might promote uveitogenic T cell activation, since HMGB1 antagonists or blockade of binding of CXCL12 to its receptor CXCR4 reduce ocular inflammation and suppress uveitogenic T cell proliferation and Th1 and Th17 cytokine production.[12,14] These findings indicate that the innate immune response, including PAMP/DAMP release, is involved in sustaining T cell-mediated adaptive autoimmune uveitis. However, the correlation of HMGB1 with the recurrence of intraocular inflammation is unknown.S100A8, another important DMAP member is a small-sized 10-kDa molecule and preferentially exists as a heterodimer or heterotetramer with S100A9, known as calprotectin (S100A8/A9).[15] These molecules are highly expressed on bone marrow-derived myeloid cells, specifically neutrophils and monocytes, and on endothelial cells.[15] During the early phase of the immune response, infiltrating myeloid cells release S100A8/9 at local sites of inflammation.[16-19] Serum levels of this complex have been used as a very early and sensitive biomarker for local inflammatory activity[15] and are also highly increased during wound-healing processes, tumorigenesis, and autoimmune disorders.[20] Released extracellular S100A8/A9 exerts several paracrine and autocrine effects and stimulates monocytes and macrophages by binding to RAGE, toll-like receptor (TLR) 4, and other receptors required for the activation of MAPK- and NF-κB signaling-dependent mechanisms,[15] thus leading to increased production of proinflammatory molecules and cytokines.[21] S100A8/A9 also stimulates autoreactive T cells.[22]In the tEAU model induced by transfer of R16-specific T cells in rats, the disease is triggered by pathogenic effector T cells without contamination by microbial components used in direct antigen injection models (aEAU). Using tEAU model, we examined whether there were associations between S100A8/9 and HMGB1 levels in the AqH and blood and each episode of intraocular inflammation, focusing on the effects of S100A8/9 on the regulation of pathogenic effector T cells and Tregs that might account for the recurrent and remission character of the disease.
Materials and Methods
Animals and Reagents
Pathogen-free female Lewis rats (5- to 6-week-old) were purchased from Envigo (Indianapolis, IN, USA), and housed and maintained at the animal facilities of the University of Louisville (Louisville, KY, USA). All animal studies conformed to the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. The protocol (#17095) was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Louisville and institutional guidelines regarding animal experimentation were followed. The bovineIRBP peptide R16 (residues 1177–1191, ADGSSWEGVGVVPDV) was synthesized by Sigma-Aldrich Corp. (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Preparation of R16-Specific T Cells
R16-specific T cells were isolated from R16-immunized Lewis rats using previously described methods.[4,5] T cells were isolated from the draining lymph nodes and spleen at 12 days postimmunization (p.i.) by passage through a nylon wool column. The cells (1 × 107) were then stimulated for 2 days with 20 μg/mL R16 in 2 mL complete medium (CM; RPMI 1640 [Mediatech, Manassas, VA, USA] supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum [FCS; Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA], 5 × 10−5 M 2-mercapatoethanol, and 100 μg/mL penicillin/streptomycin) in a six-well plate (Costar, Cambridge, MA, USA) in the presence of 1 × 107 irradiated syngeneic spleen cells as APCs, then activated lymphoblasts were isolated by gradient centrifugation in Percoll Plus (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Marlborough, MA, USA) and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 15% IL-2-containing medium (supernatant from Con A-stimulated rat spleen cells).
Animal Model of tEAU in Lewis Rat and Clinical Evaluation
tEAU was induced by adoptive transfer of activated R16-specific T cells prepared as above into naïve Lewis rats (3 × 106/rat).[4,5] The injected rats were examined daily for clinical signs of uveitis by slit-lamp biomicroscopy and the intensity of uveitis was scored blind on an arbitrary scale of 0 to 4, as described previously,[4] with 0 as no disease, 1 as engorged blood vessels in the iris and an abnormal pupil configuration, 2 as a hazy anterior chamber, 3 as a moderately opaque anterior chamber, with the pupil still visible, and 4 as an opaque anterior chamber, obscured pupil, and, frequently, proptosis.
Pathological Examination
Inflammation of the eye was confirmed by histopathology. Whole eyes were collected, immersed for 1 hour in 4% phosphate-buffered glutaraldehyde, and transferred to 10% phosphate-buffered formaldehyde until processed. The fixed and dehydrated tissue was embedded in methacrylate, and 5-μm sections were cut through the pupillary-optic nerve plane and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Presence or absence of disease was evaluated blind by examining six sections cut at different levels for each eye. Severity of EAU was scored on a scale of 0 (no disease) to 4 (maximum disease) in half-point increments, as described previously.[4]
Collection of AqH and Serum
AqH (20 μL/rat) was collected from both eyes by anterior chamber puncture using a 30-gauge needle under a surgical microscope and stored immediately in a −80°C freezer until use for quantitative proteomics using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) and Western blot.Blood was collected from the vena cava and left 30 minutes at room temperature to clot, then was centrifuged at 9300g for 10 minutes and the serum removed and stored immediately in a −80°C freezer until use for ELISA.
Measurement of HMGB1 and S100A8 Levels in AqH by Western Blot Analysis
AqH in one R16-T cell injected rat (5 μL) was mixed with 5 μL 2 × Laemmli reducing sample buffer and heated at 95° for 5 minutes, then was run on SDSpolyacrylamide gels. Western blotting was performed on nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) as described previously[10] using anti-S100A8 Ab (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA) and anti-HMGB1 Ab (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). Rat spleen was used as a positive control for S100A8 and HMGB1.
Measurement of HMGB1 and S100A8 Levels in Serum by ELISA
Samples of serum (5 μL) were diluted 1:10 in the buffer included in the kit and added to wells precoated with HMGB1 (Abcam) or S100A8 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) capture Abs, then HMGB1 or S100A8 levels were measured following the manufacturer's instructions.
Treatment of tEAU With an S100 Inhibitor
Naïve Lewis rats were treated with the Q compound paquinimod (ABR-215757; a gift from Active Biotech AB, Lund, Sweden), a compound that blocks binding of S100A9.[23,24] The compound (PA) was used at an oral dosage of approximately 25 mg/kg/day, starting 1 day before T cell transfer and continuing throughout the experiment.[25] To achieve this dose in a rat weighing approximately 200 g and drinking approximately 20 mL water/day, 0.25 mg/mL PA was added to the drinking water, the water bottles being replaced every other day. Plain drinking water was supplied to the controls. There were no evident side effects against rats including the weight changes in these treated rats.[24,26]
Assays for R16-Specific T Cell Proliferation and Cytokine Production
Nylon wool-enriched T cells prepared from pooled spleen on the indicated days after transfer of R16-specific T cells were seeded at 4 × 105 cells/well in 96-well plates and cultured at 37°C for 60 hours in a total volume of 200 μL CM alone or CM containing the indicated concentrations of R16 in the presence of irradiated syngeneic spleen APCs (1 × 105), and BrdU incorporation during the last 8 hours was assessed using BrdU assay kits (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The proliferative response was expressed as the mean OD ± SD for triplicate samples or the proliferative stimulus index calculated as the ratio of the mean OD measured in the presence of the Ag to that in the absence of Ag and the experiment was performed three times, with similar results. To measure cytokine production by responder T cells, supernatants were collected after 48 hours of T cell stimulation as above and assayed for IFN-γ, IL-17, and IL-10 using ELISA kits (R&D Systems).
Isolation of Cells From Inflamed Eyes
After perfusion of the anesthetized rat with PBS on the indicated day after transfer of T cells, the eyes were collected and a cell suspension prepared by digestion for 10 minutes at 37°C with collagenase (1 mg/mL) and DNase (100 μg/mL) in RPMI 1640, followed by gradient centrifugation on 25% Percoll and subsequent Ficoll separation, then the cells were washed and resuspended in staining buffer (PBS containing 3% FCS and 0.1% sodium azide) for antibody staining.[8,27]
Immunofluorescence Flow Cytometry
Aliquots of 5 × 105 APCs were stained with FITC- or PE-conjugated monoclonal antibodies against ratCD200R, CD80, CD86, or OX6. For staining of Foxp3 Tregs, T cells were incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C with anti-CD4 or isotype control Abs, fixed overnight with 1 mL fixation buffer (Fix and Perm cell permeabilization kit; eBioscience, La Jolla, CA, USA), washed, and incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C with anti-rat-Foxp3 antibody. For intracellular cytokine staining, T cells were pretreated for 4 hours with 50 ng/mL PMA, 1 μg/mL ionomycin, and 1 μg/mL brefeldin A (all from Sigma-Aldrich Corp.), then were washed, incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C with anti-CD4 or isotype control Abs, fixed, permeabilized overnight with Cytofix/Cytoperm buffer (eBioscience), and incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C with anti-rat-IFN-γ or IL-17 Abs. Data collection and analysis were performed on a FACScaliber flow cytometer using CellQuest software (BD, San Jose, CA, USA). All antibodies used for flow cytometry analysis were purchased from eBioscience.
Data Analysis
Experiments were performed at least three times. Data analysis for the iTRAQ experiments was performed as described previously,[28] while other statistical analyses were performed using the unpaired Student's t-test for two sets of data, 1-way or 2-way ANOVA for three or more means, or the Mann-Whitney U test for the pathological score of uveitis. Values determined to be significantly different from those for controls are marked with asterisks in the figures (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).
Results
Association Between S100A8 Levels in the AqH and Recurrent Uveitis
To explore whether levels of DAMP family molecules correlated with recurrent episodes of EAU, we induced tEAU in Lewis rats by adoptive transfer of R16-specific T cells[4] and collected AqH and sera on days 0 (naïve), 1, 4 (onset), 12 (remission), 19 (second attack), 25 (second remission), and 32 (third attack) for proteomic analysis and Western blot analysis (AqH) and ELISA (serum). We first analyzed protein profiles in the AqH samples by iTRAQ quantitative proteomics. AqH samples from six rats were pooled at each time point and assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient by analyzing the results for duplicate samples per experiment in two independent experiments. Of the ∼200 identified AqH proteins (<1% false discovery rate), 34 were found to correlate with clinical recurrence (Table) and one of these was the DAMP molecule S100A8.
Table
The Spearman Correlation Coefficient Was Used to Determine if There Was a Nonlinear Relationship Between the Clinical Profile and Protein Relative Expression Level
The Spearman Correlation Coefficient Was Used to Determine if There Was a Nonlinear Relationship Between the Clinical Profile and Protein Relative Expression LevelThe correlation between S100A8 levels in the AqH with tEAU episodes was confirmed by Western blotting (Fig. 1A). S100A8 was not detected in the naïve eye and on day 1 (before the first episode of intraocular inflammation), but levels were increased during the initial attack (day 4) and during the second and third relapses (days 19 and 32) and reduced during the first and second remissions (days 12 and 25).
Figure 1
Changes in levels of extracellular S100A8 and HMGB1 in the eye and blood during the course of tEAU. (A) The clinical score of tEAU was noted and AqH samples collected on days 0, 1, 4, 12, 19, 25, and 32 posttransfer for S100A8 and HMGB1 levels determined by Western blotting. Lane 1 is the positive control (rat splenocytes). (B) tEAU was induced in three rats (#1–#3) and the clinical score recorded (indicated in red) and a blood sample taken at the indicated time point, then S100A8 and HMGB1 levels in the blood of each rat were determined by ELISA.
Changes in levels of extracellular S100A8 and HMGB1 in the eye and blood during the course of tEAU. (A) The clinical score of tEAU was noted and AqH samples collected on days 0, 1, 4, 12, 19, 25, and 32 posttransfer for S100A8 and HMGB1 levels determined by Western blotting. Lane 1 is the positive control (rat splenocytes). (B) tEAU was induced in three rats (#1–#3) and the clinical score recorded (indicated in red) and a blood sample taken at the indicated time point, then S100A8 and HMGB1 levels in the blood of each rat were determined by ELISA.We have previously demonstrated that HMGB1, another important DAMP member, is an early and critical mediator in a tEAU model of chronic experimental autoimmune uveitis in mice.[12] As in our previous findings in the eye in mousetEAU,[12] in the present study, HMGB1 levels were increased on day 1 after T cell transfer and remained high during the entire observation period, even in remission (Fig. 1A).To determine whether S100A8 and HMGB1 levels in the blood correlated with tEAU score and could be used as biomarkers for attacks and relapses, we measured S100A8 and HMGB1 in serum collected from the same rats tested in Figure 1A and failed to detect any correlation between serum S100A8 and HMGB1 levels and tEAU (data not shown). In addition, we induced tEAU in another three rats (Fig. 1B) and measured their disease score and S100A8 and HMGB1 levels over 34 days and found no correlation between serum S100A8 levels and clinical score, while serum HMGB1 levels showed a similar pattern to those seen in the AqH in Figure 1A.
Treatment With the S100A9 Inhibitor Paquinimod Reduces Recurrence of Uveitis
To further determine the importance of S100A8/9 in the recurrence of intraocular inflammation, we treated groups of tEAUrats orally with or without paquinimod (PA), a drug that blocks the binding of S100A9,[23,24] using the protocol described in the Methods section and monitored the clinical score in 6 to 21 rats from each group for 41 days, then examined the pathology (Fig. 2). Other rats from each group were used in further tests described in subsequent sections (Figs. 3–6). As judged by clinical evaluation, the PA-treated tEAUrats showed reduced inflammation during the first attack and had fewer relapses compared to the controls (Fig. 2A). Pathologic evaluation on day 41 showed infiltrating cells in the vitreous and retinal damage in the control non-PA-treated rats, but not in the PA-treated group (Fig. 2B). We also analyzed eye-infiltrating cells in PA-treated and non-PA-treated rats on day 25 by staining with a panel of antibodies specific for different leukocyte subsets, followed by flow cytometric analysis. As shown in Figure 2C, in the control group, CD4 T cells were dominant during this recurrence, while the PA-treated rats showed a profound reduction in CD4 T cells (42.4% ± 3.1 in the nontreated controls and 10.5% ± 5.9 in the PA-treated group). Percentage of NK cells (control 3.6% + 1.3/treated 1.4% + 1.0) and granulocytes (control 4.6% + 2.2/treated 1.1% + 0.8) were also significantly reduced in the eyes of PA-treated rats. However, percentages of NKT cells (control 3% + 1.9/treated 1.9% ± 1.3) and CD11b cells (control 3.9% ± 1.3/treated 4.4% + 3.0) were not significantly changed between treated and nontreated groups. Since total infiltrating cells were much less in treated eyes than nontreated eyes, the number of cells in each subtype in treated eyes was significantly reduced (Fig. 2D). A similar result of infiltrating leukocyte subsets was seen during the first attack on day 5 after tEAU induction (data not shown). These results suggest that S100A8/9 released by inflammatory cells might be associated with the recruitment of infiltrating cells, in particular, T cells and granulocytes.
Figure 2
Disease evaluation after treatment with or without the S100A9 inhibitor paquinimod. Groups of rats were given with plain drinking water (Ctrl) or PA-containing drinking water as described in the Methods and Materials section and were used in the studies in Figures 2 to 6. (A) Disease severity was monitored daily by slit lamp microscopy for 41 days. n = 6–21 animals per group. *P < 0.05 and **< P < 0.01 compared to the Ctrl group using the Mann-Whitney U test. All values are expressed as mean ± SEM. (B) Representative pathology for A on day 41 (left two panels). H&E; original magnification, ×100, and mean ± SD of pathological score from six rats on day 41 (right panel). (C) Percentage of different subsets of infiltrating leukocytes in the eye in the two groups examined by flow cytometry on day 25. n = 3 rats in each group; all values are expressed as mean ± SEM of two different experiments. *P < 0.05 and **< P < 0.01 compared to the Ctrl group D. Summary of infiltrative cells, and subsets, from each rat of two different experiments is shown. Cells recovered from eyes of each group were counted after trypan blue staining. The number of cells was calculated based on the percentage of subsets as determined by flow cytometry.
Figure 3
Low specific T cell responses in tEAU rats treated with paquinimod. Rats were treated as in Figure 2. (A) Responder T cells prepared on days 5 (left panel) and 25 (right panel) from the two groups of tEAU rats were incubated with 10 μg/mL R16 and their proliferation measured using the BrdU assay. Baseline data for T cells without antigen stimulation were 0.085 ± 0.012 (Ctrl) and 0.112 ± 0.034 (PA-treated) at D5, and 0.097 ± 0.02 (Ctrl) and 0.15 ± 0.06 (PA-treated) at day 25. (B) Responder T cells prepared on day 25 were cultured in FCS-free medium for 24 hours, then the fluorescence intensity of annexin V- and PI-gated T cells examined by flow cytometry. (C) Levels of IFN-γ (top panels) and IL-17 (bottom panels) released into the culture supernatants after 48-hour stimulation with R16 as described in (A) measured by ELISA. (D) At mean time, T cells were collected from C and frequencies of CD4+IFN-γ+ and CD4+IL-17+ T cells analyzed by flow cytometry. n = 3 rats in each group; representative of three separate experiments; all values are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 and **< P < 0.01 compared to the Ctrl group. In (B) and (D), the percentage of positive cells is indicated on the gated cells.
Figure 6
Expression of costimulatory molecules on APCs from PA-treated tEAU rats or in vitro treated with S100A8. Rats were treated as in Figure 2, then APCs isolated on day 16 were examined for expression of MHC class II and costimulatory molecules by flow cytometry analysis. (B) APCs isolated on day 16 from control treated tEAU rats were incubated in vitro with 0, 1, or 5 μM S100A8 for 24 hours, then were examined as above. Representative of three separate experiments; all values are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 and **< P < 0.01 compared to the Ctrl group.
Disease evaluation after treatment with or without the S100A9 inhibitor paquinimod. Groups of rats were given with plain drinking water (Ctrl) or PA-containing drinking water as described in the Methods and Materials section and were used in the studies in Figures 2 to 6. (A) Disease severity was monitored daily by slit lamp microscopy for 41 days. n = 6–21 animals per group. *P < 0.05 and **< P < 0.01 compared to the Ctrl group using the Mann-Whitney U test. All values are expressed as mean ± SEM. (B) Representative pathology for A on day 41 (left two panels). H&E; original magnification, ×100, and mean ± SD of pathological score from six rats on day 41 (right panel). (C) Percentage of different subsets of infiltrating leukocytes in the eye in the two groups examined by flow cytometry on day 25. n = 3 rats in each group; all values are expressed as mean ± SEM of two different experiments. *P < 0.05 and **< P < 0.01 compared to the Ctrl group D. Summary of infiltrative cells, and subsets, from each rat of two different experiments is shown. Cells recovered from eyes of each group were counted after trypan blue staining. The number of cells was calculated based on the percentage of subsets as determined by flow cytometry.Low specific T cell responses in tEAUrats treated with paquinimod. Rats were treated as in Figure 2. (A) Responder T cells prepared on days 5 (left panel) and 25 (right panel) from the two groups of tEAUrats were incubated with 10 μg/mL R16 and their proliferation measured using the BrdU assay. Baseline data for T cells without antigen stimulation were 0.085 ± 0.012 (Ctrl) and 0.112 ± 0.034 (PA-treated) at D5, and 0.097 ± 0.02 (Ctrl) and 0.15 ± 0.06 (PA-treated) at day 25. (B) Responder T cells prepared on day 25 were cultured in FCS-free medium for 24 hours, then the fluorescence intensity of annexin V- and PI-gated T cells examined by flow cytometry. (C) Levels of IFN-γ (top panels) and IL-17 (bottom panels) released into the culture supernatants after 48-hour stimulation with R16 as described in (A) measured by ELISA. (D) At mean time, T cells were collected from C and frequencies of CD4+IFN-γ+ and CD4+IL-17+ T cells analyzed by flow cytometry. n = 3 rats in each group; representative of three separate experiments; all values are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 and **< P < 0.01 compared to the Ctrl group. In (B) and (D), the percentage of positive cells is indicated on the gated cells.Paquinimod treatment enhances T regulatory cell activity. In (A) to (C), rats were treated as in Figure 2. (A, B) Responder T cells prepared on days 5 and 25 from the two groups of tEAUrats were stimulated as described in Figure 3A. IL-10 in the supernatants was assayed by ELISA (A) and percentage of CD4+FoxP3+ cells among the stimulated T cells from day 25 of two groups analyzed by flow cytometry (B). (C) Percentage of FoxP3+ cells among CD4+ T cells in the eye in the two groups of tEAUrats on days 5 and 25 was examined by flow cytometry. A–D: n = 3 rats in each group; representative of three separate experiments; all values are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 and **< P < 0.01 compared to the Ctrl group. (D) RecalledtEAU clinical scores (mean ± SEM) in three groups of naïve Lewis rats receiving stimulated R16-specific T cells from either PA- or control tEAUrats or both. n = 6 rats in each group; representative of two separate experiments. *P < 0.05 and **< P < 0.01 are the clinical scores induced by R16 T cells from PA-treated tEAUrats compared to those induced by R16 T cells from Ctrl group; #P < 0.05 and ##< P < 0.01 are the clinical scores induced by R16 T cells from both treated and ctrl tEAUrats compared to those induced by R16 T cells from Ctrl group. (E) Pathological scores (mean + SEM) at the end of experiment D. *P < 0.05 and **< P < 0.01 compared to the Ctrl group.APCs from PA-treated rats lose the ability to activate T cells. Rats were treated as in Figure 2, then responder T cells and splenic APCs were prepared on day 16 from each group. Proliferation of all four combinations of T cells and APCs in the stimulation with increasing concentrations of R16 were measured. Baseline data for T cells without antigen stimulation were 0.091 ± 0.003 (Ctrl APC and T cells), 0.13 ± 0.003 (PA-treated APC and T cells), 0.1 ± 0.025 (Ctrl APC and PA-treated T cells), and 0.1 ± 0.025 (PA treated APC and Ctrl T cells). Representative of three separate experiments; all values are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 and **< P < 0.01 compared to the Ctrl group.Expression of costimulatory molecules on APCs from PA-treated tEAUrats or in vitro treated with S100A8. Rats were treated as in Figure 2, then APCs isolated on day 16 were examined for expression of MHC class II and costimulatory molecules by flow cytometry analysis. (B) APCs isolated on day 16 from control treated tEAUrats were incubated in vitro with 0, 1, or 5 μM S100A8 for 24 hours, then were examined as above. Representative of three separate experiments; all values are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 and **< P < 0.01 compared to the Ctrl group.
Paquinimod Treatment Significantly Inhibits R16-Specific T Cell Responses
To further explore the role of the S100A8/9 complex in tEAU and the mechanism by which PA inhibits induction of tEAU, we measured R16-specific responses of T cells from the two groups of tEAUrats treated as in Figure 2A. As shown in Figure 3A, compared to control tEAUrats, PA-treated tEAUrats showed significantly decreased specific T cell proliferation not only on day 5 (left panel), but also on day 25 post-T cell transfer (right panel). This reduction was not due to cell death, since the day 25 PA-treated tEAU T cells contained similar numbers of apoptotic cells as control tEAU T cells when cultured in FCS-deficient medium for 24 hours (Fig. 3B) or 48 or 72 hours (data not shown).Since both R16-specific Th1 and Th17 cells are pathogenic for tEAU induction, we examined whether PA treatment preferentially affected IFN-γ and/or IL-17+ autoreactive T cells. As shown in Figure 3C, levels of IFN-γ (top panels) and IL-17 (bottom panels) released into the culture supernatants by T cells from PA-treated tEAUrats on both day 5 (left panels) and 25 (right panels) post-T cell transfer were markedly lower than those produced by T cells from control tEAUrats, indicating a long-lasting inhibitory effect of PA on pathogenic T cells (note treatment was stopped on day 10). In addition, antibody staining and flow cytometry of cells from day 25 (Fig. 3D) showed that 44.5% of T cells from control-treated tEAUrats expressed IFN-γ and 6.5% expressed IL-17, while the corresponding figures for PA-treated tEAUrats were 7.9% and 2.3%.
R16-Specific T Cells Isolated From PA-Treated tEAU Rats Acquire Regulatory Activity
In contrast, as shown in Figure 4A, R16-specific T cells from PA-treated tEAUrats on day 5 (left panels) or day 25 (right panel) produced significant higher amounts of IL-10 in response to antigenic challenge compared to cells from control tEAUrats. Examination of the phenotype of R16-specific T cells from PA-treated tEAUrats on day 25 showed that they expressed higher levels of Foxp3 than responder T cells from control tEAUrats (Fig. 4B). In addition, we examined Tregs in the eyes of the control and treated groups and, as shown in Figure 4C, found that the percentage of Foxp3+ T cells in the CD4+ T cells was significantly increased in the eyes of PA-treated rats at both day 5 (left panel) and 25 (right panel). We then examined the in vivo disease-inducing ability of R16-specific T cells from PA-treated or control tEAUrats by injecting naïve Lewis rats with 5 × 106 R16-specific T cells isolated on day 16 from either PA-treated or control tEAUrats or with 5 × 106 cells from each group. As shown in Figure 4D, R16-specific T cells from control tEAUrats (black line) induced full disease upon transfer into naïve recipients, while those isolated from PA-treated tEAUrats (blue line) induced mild EAU without relapses. Moreover, T cells from PA-treated tEAUrats neutralized the pathogenic activity of R16-specific T cells isolated from control tEAUrats when both T cell populations were transferred into one rat (red line).
Figure 4
Paquinimod treatment enhances T regulatory cell activity. In (A) to (C), rats were treated as in Figure 2. (A, B) Responder T cells prepared on days 5 and 25 from the two groups of tEAU rats were stimulated as described in Figure 3A. IL-10 in the supernatants was assayed by ELISA (A) and percentage of CD4+FoxP3+ cells among the stimulated T cells from day 25 of two groups analyzed by flow cytometry (B). (C) Percentage of FoxP3+ cells among CD4+ T cells in the eye in the two groups of tEAU rats on days 5 and 25 was examined by flow cytometry. A–D: n = 3 rats in each group; representative of three separate experiments; all values are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 and **< P < 0.01 compared to the Ctrl group. (D) Recalled tEAU clinical scores (mean ± SEM) in three groups of naïve Lewis rats receiving stimulated R16-specific T cells from either PA- or control tEAU rats or both. n = 6 rats in each group; representative of two separate experiments. *P < 0.05 and **< P < 0.01 are the clinical scores induced by R16 T cells from PA-treated tEAU rats compared to those induced by R16 T cells from Ctrl group; #P < 0.05 and ##< P < 0.01 are the clinical scores induced by R16 T cells from both treated and ctrl tEAU rats compared to those induced by R16 T cells from Ctrl group. (E) Pathological scores (mean + SEM) at the end of experiment D. *P < 0.05 and **< P < 0.01 compared to the Ctrl group.
The Effect of the S100A8/9 Inhibitor Is, in Part, on APCs
To examine whether the reduced proliferation of lymphocytes was a direct effect of the S100A8/9 inhibitor on T cells or an indirect effect on T cells via APCs, we performed crossover tests in which T cell proliferation was measured using all four combinations of responder T cells and APCs isolated on day 16 from the two sets of tEAUrats. As shown in Figure 5, T cells from PA-treated tEAUrats did not respond to increasing doses of R16 in the presence of APCs from either PA-treated or control tEAUrats, whereas T cells from control tEAUrats reacted well in the presence of APCs from control tEAUrats, but not PA-treated tEAUrats, indicating that dysfunction of both T cells and APCs contributed to the T cell hyporesponsiveness in PA-treated mice.
Figure 5
APCs from PA-treated rats lose the ability to activate T cells. Rats were treated as in Figure 2, then responder T cells and splenic APCs were prepared on day 16 from each group. Proliferation of all four combinations of T cells and APCs in the stimulation with increasing concentrations of R16 were measured. Baseline data for T cells without antigen stimulation were 0.091 ± 0.003 (Ctrl APC and T cells), 0.13 ± 0.003 (PA-treated APC and T cells), 0.1 ± 0.025 (Ctrl APC and PA-treated T cells), and 0.1 ± 0.025 (PA treated APC and Ctrl T cells). Representative of three separate experiments; all values are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 and **< P < 0.01 compared to the Ctrl group.
PA-Treated APCs Show Reduced Expression of Costimulatory Molecules
To examine the phenotype of APCs from PA-treated tEAUrats, we looked at the expression of MHC class II and costimulatory molecules. As shown in Figure 6A, APCs isolated from PA-treated tEAUrats on day 16 expressed lower levels of MHC class II (difference not significant) and significantly lower levels of the costimulatory molecules CD86 and CD80 compared to the non-PA-treated tEAUrats, but significantly higher levels of CD200R.We also examined the expression of MHC class II molecules and costimulatory molecules on APCs from tEAU that were incubated in vitro with 0, 1, or 5 μM S100A8 for 24 hours. As shown in Figure 6B, APCs exposed to S100A8 showed a dose-dependent increase in levels of MHC molecules and CD80 and CD86 and a reduction in CD200R levels.
Discussion
There is extensive evidence that S100A8 is a very early and sensitive biomarker in experimental and clinical inflammation with various origins, such as infection, toxicity, trauma, cancer, and autoimmunity. Two decades ago, S100A8 was reported to be expressed by large ED1+ monocytic perivascular cells that accumulate on days 11 to 14 of aEAU induced by immunization with a retinal antigen and complete adjuvant containing H37Ramycobacterium tuberculosis (TB).[29] A recent article compared levels of S100A8/9 molecules in the AqH of Lewis rats in two experimental inflammatory diseases, aEAU and primed mycobacterial uveitis (PMU; intraocular inflammation initiated by subcutaneous injection of TB H37Ra antigen followed by additional intravitreal injection of H37Ra) and found elevated S100A8 and S100A9 in both models of uveitis.[30] In the present study, we first demonstrated that local S100A8 levels correlated with recurrent episodes of autoimmune uveitis in a rat model induced by transfer of pathogenic effector T cells without the use of infectious macrobiotics that mimics the characteristics of human recurrent uveitis. Our results suggest that S100A8 might be a critical modulator in the initiation of recurrence and serve as a warning/danger signal for a flare of inflammation.As shown in Figure 1A, S100A8 was not detected in the normal rat eye. The local increase in S100A8 might be due to a rapid influx of macrophages and other leukocytes, such as neutrophils, that express S100A8, and/or to activated tissue macrophages/microglia and dendritic cells. Since the inflammation only occurs in the eye, it is not surprising that, although systemic levels of S100A8/A9 were increased compared to the naïve control, serum levels did not correlate with uveitis activity. Our results are consistent with those in a recent clinical pilot study,[31] which showed (1) that, in idiopathic anterior uveitis (IAU) inflammation in the iris and ciliary body without systemic involvement, serum S100A8/9 levels were significantly higher than in healthy controls, but did not differ between IAU patients with active or inactive eye disease, whereas S100A8/A9 levels in the AqH of patients with IAU were higher than in nonuveitic controls, and (2) that, in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis, a form of uveitis with systemic involvement, S100A8/A9 levels were significantly elevated in both the AqH and serum compared to nonuveitis controls and the increase in serum S100A8/A9 levels correlated with uveitis activity.Although extracellular S100A8/A9 levels are massively upregulated in diverse inflammatory autoimmune disorders,[32,33] little is known about their roles in adaptive immune responses and their effects on T and B cells. In 2010, Loser et al.[22] analyzed the effects of S100A8 and S100A9 in a mouse model of CD40L-induced dermatitis and showed that both are required for the development of functional autoreactive CD8+ T cells. In their study, S100A8 and S100A9 induced IL-17 production in CD8+ T cells in the animal model, and in vitro stimulation of CD8+ T-cells from human subjects with active lupus erythematosus with S100A8 and S100A9 led to upregulation of IL-17 expression. A group of anti-inflammatory drugs, quinoline-3-carboxamides (Q compounds), has been demonstrated to specifically block the binding of S100A9 to TLR4 and RAGE.[34] Members of this drug family have shown proof-of-concept in clinical trials for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, such as multiple sclerosis,[35] systemic lupus erythematosus,[26] and Crohn's disease.[36] PA was found to reduce the priming of proinflammatory effector CD4+ T cells in experimental autoimmune encephalitis[25] and selectively inhibit recruitment of Ly6Chi inflammatory monocytes and eosinophils during sterile peritoneal inflammation elicited by injecting necrotic tumor cells in B6 mice.[37] We therefore used PA to explore the role of the extracellular S100A8/A9 in adaptive immune responses and their effects on T cells in tEAU. Our data showed that oral administration of PA significantly protected rats from recurrences. The mechanisms by which PA reduced intraocular inflammation were (1) inhibition of recruitment of inflammatory cells into the eye (Fig. 2) and (2) a reduction in the numbers of R16-specific Th17 and Th1 cells and an increase in the numbers and functions of Tregs (Figs. 3, 4). Coinjection of PA-treated R16-specific T cells into naïve recipients prevented induction of tEAU by pathogenic R16-T cells, indicating an inhibitory function of Tregs. The results that the PA-treated T cells have inhibitory effects on T effector cells (Fig. 4) could be explained by increases in the number and function of Tregs, which might be in part converted from PA-treated T effector cells. By performing cross-proliferation tests in which T cell proliferation was measured using all combinations of responding T cells and APCs isolated from tEAUrats with or without treatment with PA, we found that increased Tregs in PA-treated tEAUrats might be due, in part, to an effect on APCs, which expressed reduced levels of CD80, CD86, and MHC class II antigen and increased levels of CD200R (Fig. 6A). CD200R functions as a coinhibitory receptor that, upon interaction with CD200, hinders myeloid cell function.[38,39] In addition, CD200 has also been demonstrated to downmodulate T and NK cell functions.[40] Whether increased expression of CD200R in APCs leads to reduced T effectors and increased Tregs requires further investigation. An opposite effect on the expression of these molecules was seen on APCs incubated in vitro with recombinant S100A8 (Fig. 6B). A previous study using PA in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis showed that PA ameliorates the disease by reducing effector T cell priming when given before disease induction by antigen immunization, and, on prolonged treatment, by selectively decreasing distinct subpopulations of splenic CD11b(+) myeloid cells.[25] Our results showing that PA treatment in tEAU increases Tregs, which might be in part converted from T effector cells demonstrates a new mechanism for the effect of PA in T cell-mediated autoimmune diseases.In summary, our data show that the S100A8/A9 molecules play a critical role during recurrent uveitis, exerting and amplifying autocrine and paracrine proinflammatory effects on APCs and T cells, and reducing numbers and function of Treg cells that promote inflammatory remission. In addition, S100A8 increases the expression of positive costimulatory molecules and reduces the expression of a negative costimulatory molecule. Our data demonstrate a link between local expression of DAMP molecules and autoimmune responses and suggest that complete S100A8/A9 blockade may be a new therapeutic target in recurrent uveitis.
Authors: R M Hoek; S R Ruuls; C A Murphy; G J Wright; R Goddard; S M Zurawski; B Blom; M E Homola; W J Streit; M H Brown; A N Barclay; J D Sedgwick Journal: Science Date: 2000-12-01 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Martijn H van den Bosch; Arjen B Blom; Rik F Schelbergen; Marije I Koenders; Fons A van de Loo; Wim B van den Berg; Thomas Vogl; Johannes Roth; Peter M van der Kraan; Peter L van Lent Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Rik F P Schelbergen; Arjen B Blom; Martijn H J van den Bosch; Annet Slöetjes; Shahla Abdollahi-Roodsaz; B Wim Schreurs; John S Mort; Thomas Vogl; Johannes Roth; Wim B van den Berg; Peter L E M van Lent Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2012-05
Authors: Kathryn L Pepple; Lauren Rotkis; Leslie Wilson; Angela Sandt; Russell N Van Gelder Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Yasir J Sepah; Gabriel Velez; Peter H Tang; Jing Yang; Teja Chemudupati; Angela S Li; Quan D Nguyen; Alexander G Bassuk; Vinit B Mahajan Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep Date: 2020-03-06
Authors: Madhu Shankar; Nathalie Uwamahoro; Emelie Backman; Sandra Holmberg; Maria Joanna Niemiec; Johannes Roth; Thomas Vogl; Constantin F Urban Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Kathryn L Pepple; Leslie Wilson; Russell N Van Gelder; Marina Kovaleva; Obinna C Ubah; John Steven; Caroline J Barelle; Andrew Porter Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 3.283