Literature DB >> 29625364

Usage of EpiFinder clinical decision support in the assessment of epilepsy.

Erin M Okazaki1, Robert Yao2, Joseph I Sirven3, Amy Z Crepeau3, Katherine H Noe3, Joseph F Drazkowski3, Matthew T Hoerth3, Edgar Salinas2, Lidia Csernak2, Neel Mehta2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of epilepsy is at times elusive for both neurologists and nonneurologists, resulting in delays in diagnosis and therapy. The development of screening methods has been identified as a priority in response to this diagnostic and therapeutic gap. EpiFinder is a novel clinical decision support tool designed to enhance the process of information gathering and integration of patient/proxy respondent data. It is designed specifically to take key terms from a patient's history and incorporate them into a heuristic algorithm that dynamically produces differential diagnoses of epilepsy syndromes.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the usability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical decision support application EpiFinder in an adult population.
METHODS: Fifty-seven patients were prospectively identified upon admission to the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) for episode classification from January through June of 2017. Based on semiologic input, the application generates a list of epilepsy syndromes. The EpiFinder-generated diagnosis for each subject was compared to the final diagnosis obtained via continuous video electroencephalogram (cVEEG) monitoring.
RESULTS: Fifty-three patients had habitual events recorded during their EMU stay. A diagnosis of epilepsy was confirmed (with cVEEG monitoring) in 26 patients while 27 patients were found to have a diagnosis other than epilepsy. The algorithm appropriately predicted differentiation between the presence of an epilepsy syndrome and an alternative diagnosis with 86.8% (46/53 participants) accuracy. EpiFinder correctly identified the presence of epilepsy with a sensitivity of 86.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65.0-97.1) and specificity of 85.1% (95% CI: 70.2-96.4).
CONCLUSION: The initial testing of the EpiFinder algorithm suggests possible utility in differentiating between an epilepsy syndrome and an alternative diagnosis in adult patients.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical decision support tool; Epilepsy diagnostic gap; Epilepsy monitoring unit; Mobile application

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29625364     DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Behav        ISSN: 1525-5050            Impact factor:   2.937


  3 in total

1.  Can Big Data guide prognosis and clinical decisions in epilepsy?

Authors:  Xiaojin Li; Licong Cui; Guo-Qiang Zhang; Samden D Lhatoo
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 5.864

2.  Diagnosing spells: Machines or humans?

Authors:  Cormac A O'Donovan
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2020-04

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence as an emerging technology in the current care of neurological disorders.

Authors:  Urvish K Patel; Arsalan Anwar; Sidra Saleem; Preeti Malik; Bakhtiar Rasul; Karan Patel; Robert Yao; Ashok Seshadri; Mohammed Yousufuddin; Kogulavadanan Arumaithurai
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 4.849

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.