Literature DB >> 29625151

1 mA cathodal tDCS shows excitatory effects in children and adolescents: Insights from TMS evoked N100 potential.

Vera Moliadze1, Ekaterina Lyzhko2, Till Schmanke3, Saskia Andreas3, Christine M Freitag3, Michael Siniatchkin4.   

Abstract

In children and adolescents, 1 mA transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may cause "paradoxical" effects compared with adults: both 1 mA anodal and cathodal tDCS increase amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP) as revealed by a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex. Here, EEG based evoked potentials induced by a single pulse TMS, particularly the N100 component as marker of motor cortex inhibition, were investigated in order to explain effects of tDCS on the developing brain. In nineteen children and adolescents (11-16 years old), 1 mA anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS was applied over the left primary motor cortex for 10 min. The TMS-evoked N100 was measured by 64-channel EEG before and immediately after stimulation as well as every 10 min after tDCS for one hour. 1 mA Cathodal stimulation suppressed the N100 amplitude compared with sham stimulation. In contrast, anodal tDCS did not modify the N100 amplitude. It seems likely that the increase of the motor cortex activity under cathodal tDCS in children and adolescents as shown in previous studies can be attributed to a reduce inhibition. Based on TMS evoked N100, the study provides an insight into neuromodulatory effects of tDCS on the developing brain.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Development; TEP; TMS-EEG; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29625151     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2018.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  10 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Bruce Luber; Anna-Katharine Brem; Marom Bikson; Andre R Brunoni; Roi Cohen Kadosh; Veljko Dubljević; Shirley Fecteau; Florinda Ferreri; Agnes Flöel; Mark Hallett; Roy H Hamilton; Christoph S Herrmann; Michal Lavidor; Collen Loo; Caroline Lustenberger; Sergio Machado; Carlo Miniussi; Vera Moliadze; Michael A Nitsche; Simone Rossi; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Margitta Seeck; Gregor Thut; Zsolt Turi; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Nicole Wenderoth; Anna Wexler; Ulf Ziemann; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in ADHD: A Systematic Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Protocol-induced Electrical Field Modeling Results.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Salehinejad; Vahid Nejati; Mohsen Mosayebi-Samani; Ali Mohammadi; Miles Wischnewski; Min-Fang Kuo; Alessio Avenanti; Carmelo M Vicario; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.203

3.  Efficacy of tRNS and 140 Hz tACS on motor cortex excitability seemingly dependent on sensitivity to sham stimulation.

Authors:  Viktoria Kortuem; Navah Ester Kadish; Michael Siniatchkin; Vera Moliadze
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  No Modulatory Effects when Stimulating the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus with Continuous 6 Hz tACS and tRNS on Response Inhibition: A Behavioral Study.

Authors:  Hannah Brauer; Navah Ester Kadish; Anya Pedersen; Michael Siniatchkin; Vera Moliadze
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  Single-Pulse TMS to the Temporo-Occipital and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Evokes Lateralized Long Latency EEG Responses at the Stimulation Site.

Authors:  Tomasz A Jarczok; Friederike Roebruck; Lena Pokorny; Lea Biermann; Veit Roessner; Christoph Klein; Stephan Bender
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 6.  A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation in major neurodevelopmental disorders: ADHD, autism, and dyslexia.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Salehinejad; Elham Ghanavati; Benedikt Glinski; Amir-Homayun Hallajian; Anita Azarkolah
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Modeling Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation-Induced Electric Fields in Children and Adults.

Authors:  Patrick Ciechanski; Helen L Carlson; Sabrina S Yu; Adam Kirton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Memory and Cognition-Related Neuroplasticity Enhancement by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Rodents: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carla Cavaleiro; João Martins; Joana Gonçalves; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  The Effects of 1 mA tACS and tRNS on Children/Adolescents and Adults: Investigating Age and Sensitivity to Sham Stimulation.

Authors:  Maike Splittgerber; Jan Hendrik Suwelack; Navah Ester Kadish; Vera Moliadze
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Multichannel anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in a paediatric population.

Authors:  Maike Splittgerber; Christoph Borzikowsky; Ricardo Salvador; Oula Puonti; Kiriaki Papadimitriou; Christoph Merschformann; Maria Chiara Biagi; Tristan Stenner; Hannah Brauer; Carolin Breitling-Ziegler; Alexander Prehn-Kristensen; Kerstin Krauel; Giulio Ruffini; Anya Pedersen; Frauke Nees; Axel Thielscher; Astrid Dempfle; Michael Siniatchkin; Vera Moliadze
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.