Literature DB >> 29624832

Metacognitive Interpersonal Therapy in group (MIT-G) for young adults with personality disorders: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Raffaele Popolo1,2, Angus MacBeth3, Flaviano Canfora4, Daniela Rebecchi2,4, Cecilia Toselli5, Giampaolo Salvatore1,6, Giancarlo Dimaggio1.   

Abstract

Young adults with personality disorders (PD) other than borderline are in urgent need of validated treatments to help them in managing important life transitions. Therapeutic interventions focused upon social and interpersonal difficulties may facilitate these individuals in maximizing opportunities for employment, forming stable romantic relationships, and belong to social groups. It is also important that they are offered evidence-based, first-line time-limited treatments in order to maximize effectiveness and reduce costs. We developed a 16-session programme of group-based Metacognitive Interpersonal Therapy (MIT-G) including psychoeducation on the main interpersonal motives, an experiential component enabling practice of awareness of mental states; and use of mentalistic knowledge for purposeful problem-solving. We report a feasibility, acceptability, and clinical significance randomized clinical trial. Participants meeting inclusion criteria were randomized to receive MIT-G (n = 10) or waiting list+TAU (n = 10). Dropout rate was low and session attendance high (92.19%). Participants in the MIT-G arm had symptomatic and functional improvements consistent with large effect sizes. In the MIT-G arm similarly large effects were noted for increased capacity to understand mental states and regulate social interactions using mentalistic knowledge. Results were sustained at follow-up. Our findings suggest potential for applying MIT-G in larger samples to further test its effectiveness in reducing PD-related symptoms and problematic social functioning.
© 2018 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  group; interpersonal motives; metacognition; personality disorder; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29624832     DOI: 10.1111/papt.12182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Psychother        ISSN: 1476-0835            Impact factor:   3.915


  4 in total

Review 1.  Metacognitive approaches to the treatment of psychosis: a comparison of four approaches.

Authors:  Paul H Lysaker; Emily Gagen; Steffen Moritz; Robert D Schweitzer
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2018-09-05

Review 2.  Current state of the evidence on community treatments for people with complex emotional needs: a scoping review.

Authors:  Sarah Ledden; Luke Sheridan Rains; Merle Schlief; Phoebe Barnett; Brian Chi Fung Ching; Brendan Hallam; Mia Maria Günak; Thomas Steare; Jennie Parker; Sarah Labovitch; Sian Oram; Steve Pilling; Sonia Johnson
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.144

3.  Levels of Structural Integration Mediate the Impact of Metacognition on Functioning in Non-affective Psychosis: Adding a Psychodynamic Perspective to the Metacognitive Approach.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Bröcker; Samuel Bayer; Frauke Stuke; Sandra Just; Gianna Bertram; Jakob Funcke; Imke Grimm; Günter Lempa; Dorothea von Haebler; Christiane Montag
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-02-21

4.  Thinking about feeling: Using trait emotional intelligence in understanding the associations between early maladaptive schemas and coping styles.

Authors:  Tianyuan Ke; Joanna Barlas
Journal:  Psychol Psychother       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 3.915

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.