Literature DB >> 2962483

Relation between infarct size and left ventricular performance assessed in patients with first acute myocardial infarction randomized to intracoronary thrombolytic therapy or to conventional treatment.

A van der Laarse1, P L Kerkhof, F Vermeer, P W Serruys, W T Hermens, F W Verheugt, F W Bär, X H Krauss, E E van der Wall, M L Simoons.   

Abstract

Reperfusion of ischemic myocardium has been reported to increase the cumulative creatine kinase activity in plasma per gram of infarcted myocardium as assessed with the method of Shell et al. In an attempt to find out whether infarct size assessment using the method of Witteveen et al was affected by reperfusion, the relation between enzymatic infarct size was analyzed using Witteveen's method and left ventricular (LV) function parameters in 266 patients with first acute myocardial infarction randomized to intracoronary thrombolysis (n = 134) or conventional therapy (n = 132). Compared with patients allocated to conventional therapy, patients allocated to intracoronary thrombolysis had smaller enzymatic infarct size by 29% (p less than 0.001), smaller LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes by 10% (p less than 0.05) and 20% (p less than 0.005), respectively, and higher LV ejection fraction (55 +/- 1% vs 49 +/- 1%; p less than 0.001). The beneficial effects of thrombolytic therapy on LV performance were closely associated with thrombolysis-induced limitation of infarct size. The dependence from infarct size of LV end-diastolic volume, LV end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction was not different in the 2 therapy groups. It was concluded that Witteveen's method of infarct size assessment is not influenced by the presence of reperfusion. Therefore, this method was recommended for trials on recanalization in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2962483     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)91294-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  34 in total

1.  Echocardiography in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy; a useful approach?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; E R Holman; A J Scholte; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Tissue characterization in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy; a valuable approach?

Authors:  E E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Left ventricular mass assessment by CMR; how to define the optimal index.

Authors:  E E van der Wall; H M Siebelink; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Increased accuracy in computed tomography coronary angiography; a new body surface area adapted protocol.

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J E van Velzen; F R de Graaf; M M Boogers; J D Schuijf; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; the importance of evaluating cardiac metabolism.

Authors:  E E van der Wall; M J Schalij; A van der Laarse; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Positron emission tomography; viable tool in patients pre-CABG?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; H M Siebelink; A J Scholte; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in primary PCI: additional value?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J J Bax; J W Jukema; M J Schalij
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  CT perfusion angiography; beware of artifacts!

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J D Schuijf; J J Bax; J W Jukema; M J Schalij
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Cardiovascular dynamics in ischemic cardiomyopathy during exercise.

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J J Bax; C A Swenne; P Steendijk; M J Schalij
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; evaluation by advanced imaging techniques.

Authors:  E E van der Wall; M J Schalij; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.