Literature DB >> 29624703

Epidemiology, outcome, and risk factors for infectious complications in myelofibrosis patients receiving ruxolitinib: A multicenter study on 446 patients.

Nicola Polverelli1, Giuseppe A Palumbo2, Gianni Binotto3, Elisabetta Abruzzese4, Giulia Benevolo5, Micaela Bergamaschi6, Alessia Tieghi7, Massimiliano Bonifacio8, Massimo Breccia9, Lucia Catani10, Mario Tiribelli11, Mariella D'Adda12, Nicola Sgherza13, Alessandro Isidori14, Francesco Cavazzini15, Bruno Martino16, Roberto Latagliata9, Monica Crugnola17, Florian Heidel18, Costanza Bosi19, Adalberto Ibatici20, Francesco Soci7, Domenico Penna11, Luigi Scaffidi8, Franco Aversa17, Roberto M Lemoli6, Umberto Vitolo5, Antonio Cuneo15, Domenico Russo1, Michele Cavo10, Nicola Vianelli10, Francesca Palandri10.   

Abstract

Infections represent one of the major concerns regarding the utilization of ruxolitinib (RUX) in patients with myelofibrosis. With the aim to investigate epidemiology, outcome and risk factors for infections in RUX-exposed patients, we collected clinical and laboratory data of 446 myelofibrosis patients treated with RUX between June 2011 and November 2016 in 23 European Hematology Centers. After a median RUX exposure of 23.5 months (range, 1-56), 123 patients (28%) experienced 161 infectious events (grades 3-4 32%, fatal 9%), for an incidence rate of 17 cases per 100 pts/y. The rate of infections tended to decrease over time: 14% of patients developed the first infection within 6 months, 5% between 6 and 12 months, 3.7% between 12 and 18 months, 3.4% between 18 and 24 months, and 7.9% thereafter (P < .0001). Respiratory tract infections were more frequently observed (81 events, 50%), and bacteria were the most frequent etiological agents (68.9%). However, also viral (14.9%) and fungal infections (2.5%) were observed. In multivariate analysis, previous infectious event (HR 2.54; 95% CI, 1.51-4.28; P = .0005) and high international prognostic score system category (IPSS) (HR 1.53; 95% CI, 1.07-2.20; P = .021) significantly correlated with higher infectious risk. On the contrary, spleen reduction ≥50% from baseline after 3 months of treatment (P = .02) was associated with better infection-free survival. Taken together, these findings reinforce the concept of disease severity as the most important risk factor for infections, and describe, for the first time, that a positive therapeutic effect in reducing splenomegaly may also reduce subsequent infectious complications.
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  JAK inhibitors; infections; myelofibrosis; ruxolitinib; toxicity

Year:  2018        PMID: 29624703     DOI: 10.1002/hon.2509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 0278-0232            Impact factor:   5.271


  14 in total

1.  Tuberculosis in Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis During Ruxolitinib Therapy: Case Series and Literature Review.

Authors:  Yizhou Peng; Li Meng; Xuemei Hu; Zhiqiang Han; Zhenya Hong
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.003

2.  Fungal Infections with Ibrutinib and Other Small-Molecule Kinase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Marissa A Zarakas; Jigar V Desai; Georgios Chamilos; Michail S Lionakis
Journal:  Curr Fungal Infect Rep       Date:  2019-07-05

3.  Ruxolitinib for the treatment of inadequately controlled polycythemia vera without splenomegaly: 80-week follow-up from the RESPONSE-2 trial.

Authors:  Martin Griesshammer; Guray Saydam; Francesca Palandri; Giulia Benevolo; Miklos Egyed; Jeannie Callum; Timothy Devos; Serdar Sivgin; Paola Guglielmelli; Caroline Bensasson; Mahmudul Khan; Julian Perez Ronco; Francesco Passamonti
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2018-05-27       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 4.  Finding a Jill for JAK: Assessing Past, Present, and Future JAK Inhibitor Combination Approaches in Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Andrew T Kuykendall; Nathan P Horvat; Garima Pandey; Rami Komrokji; Gary W Reuther
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 5.  Standard care and investigational drugs in the treatment of myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Daniela Barraco; Margherita Maffioli; Francesco Passamonti
Journal:  Drugs Context       Date:  2019-09-26

6.  A subgroup analysis of JUMP, a phase IIIb, expanded-access study evaluating the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis in a Brazilian cohort.

Authors:  Renato Tavares; Carmino Antonio De Souza; Carole Paley; Catherine Bouard; Ranjan Tiwari; Ricardo Pasquini
Journal:  Hematol Transfus Cell Ther       Date:  2019-04-25

Review 7.  Focus on Osteosclerotic Progression in Primary Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Mariarita Spampinato; Cesarina Giallongo; Alessandra Romano; Lucia Longhitano; Enrico La Spina; Roberto Avola; Grazia Scandura; Ilaria Dulcamare; Vincenzo Bramanti; Michelino Di Rosa; Nunzio Vicario; Rosalba Parenti; Giovanni Li Volti; Daniele Tibullo; Giuseppe A Palumbo
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-01-19

Review 8.  Immune Dysregulation and Infectious Complications in MPN Patients Treated With JAK Inhibitors.

Authors:  Daniele Cattaneo; Alessandra Iurlo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 9.  Mechanisms Underlying the Anti-inflammatory and Immunosuppressive Activity of Ruxolitinib.

Authors:  Elena Maria Elli; Claudia Baratè; Francesco Mendicino; Francesca Palandri; Giuseppe Alberto Palumbo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Next Generation Sequencing in MPNs. Lessons from the Past and Prospects for Use as Predictors of Prognosis and Treatment Responses.

Authors:  Vibe Skov
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.