L Minig1, S Cabrera2, R Oliver3, A Couso4, M J Rubio5, S Iacoponi6, M B Martin-Salamanca7, S Carballo-Rastrilla8, J M Cádenas-Rebollo9, A García-Garcia10, B Gil-Ibáñez2, M J Juan-Fita11, M G Patrono12. 1. Gynecology Department, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), C/del Profesor Beltrán Baguena 8, 46009, Valencia, Spain. miniglucas@gmail.com. 2. Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d`Hebron, Barcelona, Spain. 3. Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain. 4. Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain. 5. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain. 6. Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario Quirón, Madrid, Spain. 7. Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain. 8. Gynecology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil de Canarias (CHUIMI), Gran Canaria, Islas Canarias, Spain. 9. Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, CEU San Pablo University, Madrid, Spain. 10. Gynecology Department, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), C/del Profesor Beltrán Baguena 8, 46009, Valencia, Spain. 11. Medical Oncology Department, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, Spain. 12. Gynecology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) after risk reduction salpingo-oophorectomy(RRSO), and to describe oncological outcomes after RRSO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BRCA pathogenic mutation carriers who had undergone an RRSO were evaluated in this retrospective multicenter observational study. Patients were only included when fallopian tubes were analyzed following the protocol for Sectioning and Extensively Examining the FIMbria (SEE-FIM). Surgeries were performed between June 2010 and April 2017 at eight Spanish hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 359 patients met the inclusion criteria. STIC was diagnosed in 3 (0.8%) patients; one of them underwent surgical staging due to positive peritoneal washing, with absence of disease at the final pathology report. None of the three patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and were free of disease at last follow-up. Fallopian tube and ovarian carcinoma were diagnosed in 5 (1.4%) and 1 (0.3%), respectively. At a median (range) follow-up time of 29 (3-92) months, five patients had a newly diagnosed breast cancer. Other types of cancer, which were diagnosed during the follow-up time, included: serous primary peritoneal carcinoma (n = 1), serous endometrial carcinoma (n = 1), colon (n = 1), pancreas (n = 1), jaw (n = 1), and lymphoma (n = 1). Seven patients died due to different types of cancer: breast (n = 4), pancreas (n = 1), jaw (n = 1), and colon (n = 1). CONCLUSION: The incidence of STIC after RRSO in BRCA mutation carriers is low (0.8%) and it presents an excellent oncological outcome. Patients after RRSO, however, run the risk to develop other types of cancer during follow-up and should be properly advised before the prophylactic surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) after risk reduction salpingo-oophorectomy(RRSO), and to describe oncological outcomes after RRSO. MATERIALS AND METHODS:BRCA pathogenic mutation carriers who had undergone an RRSO were evaluated in this retrospective multicenter observational study. Patients were only included when fallopian tubes were analyzed following the protocol for Sectioning and Extensively Examining the FIMbria (SEE-FIM). Surgeries were performed between June 2010 and April 2017 at eight Spanish hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 359 patients met the inclusion criteria. STIC was diagnosed in 3 (0.8%) patients; one of them underwent surgical staging due to positive peritoneal washing, with absence of disease at the final pathology report. None of the three patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and were free of disease at last follow-up. Fallopian tube and ovarian carcinoma were diagnosed in 5 (1.4%) and 1 (0.3%), respectively. At a median (range) follow-up time of 29 (3-92) months, five patients had a newly diagnosed breast cancer. Other types of cancer, which were diagnosed during the follow-up time, included: serous primary peritoneal carcinoma (n = 1), serous endometrial carcinoma (n = 1), colon (n = 1), pancreas (n = 1), jaw (n = 1), and lymphoma (n = 1). Seven patients died due to different types of cancer: breast (n = 4), pancreas (n = 1), jaw (n = 1), and colon (n = 1). CONCLUSION: The incidence of STIC after RRSO in BRCA mutation carriers is low (0.8%) and it presents an excellent oncological outcome. Patients after RRSO, however, run the risk to develop other types of cancer during follow-up and should be properly advised before the prophylactic surgery.
Authors: C B Powell; E M Swisher; I Cass; J McLennan; B Norquist; R L Garcia; J Lester; B Y Karlan; L Chen Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: C Bethan Powell; Lee-may Chen; Jane McLennan; Beth Crawford; Charles Zaloudek; Joseph T Rabban; Dan H Moore; John Ziegler Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Christian F Singer; D Gareth Evans; Henry T Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Judy E Garber; Susan L Neuhausen; Ellen Matloff; Rosalind Eeles; Gabriella Pichert; Laura Van t'veer; Nadine Tung; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Fergus J Couch; Wendy S Rubinstein; Patricia A Ganz; Mary B Daly; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gail Tomlinson; Joellen Schildkraut; Joanne L Blum; Timothy R Rebbeck Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Amir A Jazaeri; Jennifer L Bryant; Hong Park; Hui Li; Neetu Dahiya; Mark H Stoler; James Stuart Ferriss; Anindya Dutta Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Marcia S Brose; Timothy R Rebbeck; Kathleen A Calzone; Jill E Stopfer; Katherine L Nathanson; Barbara L Weber Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-09-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Welmoed Reitsma; Geertruida H de Bock; Jan C Oosterwijk; Joost Bart; Harry Hollema; Marian J E Mourits Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Joep M A Bogaerts; Miranda P Steenbeek; Majke H D van Bommel; Johan Bulten; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Joanne A de Hullu; Michiel Simons Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 4.535
Authors: Valerie Catherine Linz; Amelie Löwe; Josche van der Ven; Annette Hasenburg; Marco Johannes Battista Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 5.738