| Literature DB >> 29623528 |
Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah1,2, Dominique Trudel3,4, Mathieu Latour3,4, Emanuele Zaffuto1,5, Andree-Anne Grosset6, Christine Tam6, Veronique Ouellet6, Markus Graefen2, Lars Budäus2, Armen G Aprikian7, Louis Lacombe8, Neil E Fleshner9, Martin E Gleave10, Anne-Marie Mes-Masson4,6, Fred Saad11,6, Pierre I Karakiewicz1,11.
Abstract
To test the agreement between high-grade PCa at RP and TMA, and the ability of TMA to predict BCR. Validation of concordance between tissue microarray (TMA) and radical prostatectomy (RP) high-grade prostate cancer (PCa) is crucial because latter determines the treated natural history of PCa. We hypothesized that TMA Gleason score is in agreement with RP pathology and capable of accurately predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR). Data were provided from a multi-institutional Canadian sample of 1333 TMA and RP specimens with complete clinicopathological data. First, rate of agreement between TMA and high-grade Gleason at RP or biopsy and RP was tested. Second, ability of RP, TMA and biopsy to predict BCR was compared. Multivariable (MVA) Cox regression models were fitted and BCR rates were illustrated with Kaplan-Meier plots. Agreement between RP and TMA and between RP and biopsy was 72.6% (95% CI:69.7-75.5) and 60.4% (95% CI:57.2-63.6), respectively. In MVA predicting BCR, the accuracy for RP, TMA and biopsy was 0.73, 0.72 and 0.68, respectively. TMA added discriminatory ability among exclusively low-grade Gleason RP patients (p = 0.02), but did not improve BCR discrimination in exclusive high-grade PCa RP patients (p = 0.8). TMA Gleason grade accurately reflects presence of high-grade Gleason in RP specimen, accurately predicts BCR rates after RP and improves prediction of BCR in low-grade Gleason patients at RP.Entities:
Keywords: Biochemical recurrence; Gleason grade agreement; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Validation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29623528 DOI: 10.1007/s12253-018-0408-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathol Oncol Res ISSN: 1219-4956 Impact factor: 3.201