| Literature DB >> 29622988 |
Haitham Badran1, Rania Samir1, Mohamed Amin1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Premature ventricular beats (PVBs) are early depolarization of the myocardium originating in the ventricle. In case of very frequent PVBs, patients are severely symptomatic with impaired quality of life and are at risk of pre-syncope, syncope, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death particularly in the presence of structural heart disease. Ventricular outflow tracts are the most common sites of origin of idiopathic PVBs especially in patients without structural heart disease. We examined the role of radiofrequency catheter ablation in suppression of monomorphic PVBs of outflow tract origin in the presence or absence of structural heart disease, and its impact on improvement of left ventricular (LV) systolic function.Entities:
Keywords: EF, ejection fraction; EP, electrophysiological; Holter; LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract; Outflow tract; PVB, premature ventricular beats; PVBs; RVOT, right ventricular outflow tract; SCD, sudden cardiac death; VT, ventricular tachycardia
Year: 2017 PMID: 29622988 PMCID: PMC5883497 DOI: 10.1016/j.ehj.2017.05.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Egypt Heart J ISSN: 1110-2608
Baseline features of the study group.
| RVOT n = 17 | LVOT n = 20 | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 36.4 ± 12.8 | 42.9 ± 13.5 | NS |
| Male gender (n) | 9 | 11 | NS |
| Structural heart disease n (%) | 4 (23.5%) | 15 (75%) | <0.01 |
| Duration (years) | 5.5 ± 3.5 | 5.9 ± 2.6 | NS |
| Dyspnea (n) | 6 | 16 | <0.01 |
| Palpitation (n) | 14 | 15 | NS |
| Syncope (n) | 2 | 1 | NS |
| Amidarone (n) | 5 | 9 | NS |
| Sotalol (n) | 7 | 5 | NS |
| Beta blockers (n) | 5 | 6 | NS |
| LVEDD (mm) | 51.11 ± 6.73 | 54.75 ± 10.04 | NS |
| LVESD (mm) | 34.82 ± 5.52 | 38.70 ± 10.93 | NS |
| 2D EF | 60.29 ± 10.64 | 56.45 ± 14.35 | NS |
| Pre-procedural PVB burden (%) | 27.00 ± 9.44 | 24.35 ± 9.43 | NS |
| Pre-procedural PVB (n) | 28022.2 ± 8154 | 29187.2 ± 14178.2 | NS |
| Pre-procedural Bigeminy cycles (n) | 3748.94 ± 6221.45 | 5439.75 ± 10748.5 | NS |
| Pre-procedural Couplets (n) | 561.52 ± 1359.06 | 1411.30 ± 3623.64 | NS |
| Pre-procedural NSVT (n) | 77.76 ± 272.15 | 95.10 ± 203.41 | NS |
| Pre-procedural VT (n) | 0.17 ± 0.39 | 2.90 ± 12.96 | NS |
Different ECG algorithms for PVBs localization.
| ECG parameters | RVOT n = 17 | LVOT n = 20 | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| V1 | 0 | 7 | <0.001 |
| V2 | 0 | 2 | |
| V3 | 4 | 11 | |
| V4 | 10 | 0 | |
| V5 | 2 | 0 | |
| V6 | 1 | 0 | |
| PVB complex width (ms) | 148.23 ± 24.55 | 134.00 ± 18.46 | 0.05 |
| V2 transition ratio | 0.41 ± 0.30 | 1.70 ± 1.53 | <0.001 |
| R wave duration index | 0.25 ± 0.11 | 0.45 ± 0.15 | <0.001 |
Fig. 112 lead surface ECG from patient no. (21), showing frequent ventricular ectopics with PVB transition in V3, earlier than sinus beat transition, and PVB localizing algorithms were calculated as follows: V2 transition ratio of 1.5, R/S ratio of 0.6 and R wave duration index of 0.5, suggestive of LVOT PVB origin that was confirmed to originate from left coronary cusp by intracardiac mapping.
Predictive value of different ECG parameters on PVBs localization.
| Cut off value | AUC (95% CI) | P | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V2 transition ratio | ≤0.58 | 0.888 (0.769–1.000) | <0.0001 | 88.2 | 87.5 |
| R wave duration index | <0.3 | 0.858 (0.734–0.987) | <0.0001 | 82.3 | 76.4 |
| PVB/Sinus duration | >1.8 | 0.956 (0.892–1.000) | <0.0001 | 97 | 83.3 |
Fig. 2ROC curves showing sensitivity and specificity of V2 transition ratio (right panel), and R wave duration index (left panel) in predicting RVOT PVBs origin.
Fig. 3ROC curve analysis showing sensitivity and specificity of PVB/Sinus duration in predicting free wall origin of PVB.
Fig. 4Intracardiac tracing showing surface ECG, RV quadripolar catheter, and recording from ablation catheter in LCC preceding QRS complex by 42 ms in successful ablation site.
Fig. 5CARTO 3 image in LAO and RAO views showing clinical PVB and activation mapping in supra-valvular LVOT with red dots denoting site of successful ablation in LCC.
Effect of residual PVBs after ablation on recurrence.
| No recurrence n = 27 | Recurrence n = 5 | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Residual PVBs after ablation (N) | 1 (3.7%) | 5 (100%) | <0.001 |
EP procedural aspects in the study population.
| RVOT n = 17 | LVOT n = 20 | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CARTO | 12 | 14 | NS |
| NavX | 5 | 6 | NS |
| Pace mapping | 2 | 1 | NS |
| Cath induced VT (n) | 3 | 2 | NS |
| Residual PVBs after ablation (n) | 2 | 4 | NS |
| Time of earliest activation signal preceding QRS (ms) | 41.82 ± 8.55 | 44.65 ± 13.28 | NS |
| Procedural time (min) | 107.94 ± 31.27 | 125.50 ± 35.57 | NS |
| Fluoroscopy time (min) | 34.41 ± 11.04 | 40.55 ± 11.85 | NS |
| Ablation Power (Watt) | 35.29 ± 1.21 | 34.00 ± 3.007 | NS |
| Ablation temperature (C) | 50.76 ± 5.22 | 49.55 ± 4.22 | NS |
| Impedance (ohms) | 109.70 ± 8.92 | 115.80 ± 9.02 | 0.047 |
| Ablation time (s) | 388.82 ± 149.91 | 441.00 ± 214.37 | NS |
| Ablation trials | 3.52 ± 2.00 | 4.65 ± 2.47 | آٍNS |
| Complications/mortality (n) | 3/0 | 3/1 | NS |
| Acute failure | 0 | 5 | 0.057 |
| Recurrence | 2 | 3 | NS |
Post ablation holter parameters.
| RVOT n = 17 | LVOT n = 20 | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post-procedural PVB burden (%) | 1.18 ± 1.82 | 8.17 ± 9.12.41 | 0.04 |
| Post-procedural PVB (N) | 1047.18 ± 2002.36 | 9110.68 ± 18391.7 | 0.07 |
| Post-procedural Bigeminy cycles (N) | 2.29 ± 5.15 | 122.36 ± 248.86 | 0.05 |
| Post-procedural Couplets (N) | 14.05 ± 31.73 | 1261.32 ± 3925.54 | 0.18 |
| Post-procedural NSVT (N) | 0.16 ± 2.66 | 58.94 ± 176.61 | 0.16 |
| Difference in PVB burden (%) | −25.7 ± 9.55 | −17.35 ± 12.85 | 0.033 |
Fig. 6Correlation between difference in EF and difference in PVB burden pre-and post-procedural.
Relation of EF improvement to various clinical and EP parameters.
| EF improvement > 5% n = 18 | No improvement n = 18 | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post ablation PVBs burden | 1.42 ± 1.97 | 7.88 ± 12.52 | 0.03 |
| RVOT | 11 | 6 | NS |
| LVOT | 7 | 12 | NS |
| Long-term success n = 27 | 15 | 12 | NS |
| Structural heart n = 19 | 9 | 10 | NS |
| Normal heart n = 17 | 9 | 8 | NS |
| Baseline LVEDD | 55.95 ± 8.31 | 49.73 ± 8.02 | 0.02 |
| Baseline LVESD | 40.85 ± 8.31 | 32.6 ± 7.32 | 0.002 |
| Baseline EF% | 52.7 ± 12.5 | 63.2 ± 10.4 | 0.007 |