Literature DB >> 29621414

Magnetic field direction differentially impacts the growth of different cell types.

Xiaofei Tian1,2, Dongmei Wang1,2, Meng Zha1, Xingxing Yang1, Xinmiao Ji1, Lei Zhang1,2, Xin Zhang1,3.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machines have horizontal or upright static magnetic field (SMF) of 0.1-3 T (Tesla) at sites of patients and operators, but the biological effects of these SMFs still remain elusive. We examined 12 different cell lines, including 5 human solid tumor cell lines, 2 human leukemia cell lines and 4 human non-cancer cell lines, as well as the Chinese hamster ovary cell line. Permanent magnets were used to provide 0.2-1 T SMFs with different magnetic field directions. We found that an upward magnetic field of 0.2-1 T could effectively reduce the cell numbers of all human solid tumor cell lines we tested, but a downward magnetic field mostly had no statistically significant effect. However, the leukemia cells in suspension, which do not have shape-induced anisotropy, were inhibited by both upward and downward magnetic fields. In contrast, the cell numbers of most non-cancer cells were not affected by magnetic fields of all directions. Moreover, the upward magnetic field inhibited GIST-T1 tumor growth in nude mice by 19.3% (p < 0.05) while the downward magnetic field did not produce significant effect. In conclusion, although still lack of mechanistical insights, our results show that different magnetic field directions produce divergent effects on cancer cell numbers as well as tumor growth in mice. This not only verified the safety of SMF exposure related to current MRI machines but also revealed the possible antitumor potential of magnetic field with an upward direction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); cancer cells; magnetic field direction; non-cancer cells; static magnetic field (SMF)

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29621414     DOI: 10.1080/15368378.2018.1458627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electromagn Biol Med        ISSN: 1536-8386            Impact factor:   2.882


  10 in total

1.  9.4 T static magnetic field ameliorates imatinib mesylate-induced toxicity and depression in mice.

Authors:  Xiaofei Tian; Chentai Wang; Biao Yu; Yixiang Fan; Lei Zhang; Xin Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  A Static Magnetic Field Improves Iron Metabolism and Prevents High-Fat-Diet/Streptozocin-Induced Diabetes.

Authors:  Biao Yu; Juanjuan Liu; Jing Cheng; Lei Zhang; Chao Song; Xiaofei Tian; Yixiang Fan; Yue Lv; Xin Zhang
Journal:  Innovation (Camb)       Date:  2021-01-07

3.  Magnetic fields induce exclusion zones in water.

Authors:  Valery Shalatonin; Gerald H Pollack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: an update on regulation, exposure assessment techniques, health risk evaluation, and surveillance.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Giorgio Virgili; F Ederica Mattei; Cristiano Biagini; Stefania Romeo; Olga Zeni; Maria Rosaria Scarfì; Rita Massa; Francesco Campanella; Luigi Landini; Fabriziomaria Gobba; Alberto Modenese; Giulio Giovannetti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Static magnetic field regulates Arabidopsis root growth via auxin signaling.

Authors:  Yue Jin; Wei Guo; Xupeng Hu; Mengmeng Liu; Xiang Xu; Fenhong Hu; Yiheng Lan; Chenkai Lv; Yanwen Fang; Mengyu Liu; Tieliu Shi; Shisong Ma; Zhicai Fang; Jirong Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Progressive Study on the Non-thermal Effects of Magnetic Field Therapy in Oncology.

Authors:  Aoshu Xu; Qian Wang; Xin Lv; Tingting Lin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Biopharmaceutical-Type Chinese Hamster Ovary Cell Cultivation Under Static Magnetic Field Exposure: A Study of Genotoxic Effect.

Authors:  Alina Rekena; Dora Livkisa; Edmunds Kamolins; Juris Vanags; Dagnija Loca
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-25

8.  Moderate Static Magnet Fields Suppress Ovarian Cancer Metastasis via ROS-Mediated Oxidative Stress.

Authors:  Chao Song; Biao Yu; Junjun Wang; Xinmiao Ji; Lei Zhang; Xiaofei Tian; Xin Yu; Chuanlin Feng; Xinyu Wang; Xin Zhang
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 6.543

9.  Static Magnetic Fields Reduce Oxidative Stress to Improve Wound Healing and Alleviate Diabetic Complications.

Authors:  Chuanlin Feng; Biao Yu; Chao Song; Junjun Wang; Lei Zhang; Xinmiao Ji; Ying Wang; Yanwen Fang; Zhongcai Liao; Min Wei; Xin Zhang
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Effects of electromagnetic waves on oocyte maturation and embryonic development in pigs.

Authors:  Jia-Si Chen; Li-Kuang Tsai; Ting-Yu Yeh; Tzai-Shiuan Li; Cheng-Han Li; Zung-Hang Wei; Neng-Wen Lo; Jyh-Cherng Ju
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 2.214

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.