Maxwell T Vergo1,2, Briane M Pinkson1, Kathleen Broglio1,2, Zhongze Li3, Tor D Tosteson3. 1. 1 Section of Palliative Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire. 2. 2 Geisel School of Medicine , Lebanon, New Hampshire. 3. 3 Division of Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: There is an increasing demand for and use of alternative and complementary therapies, such as reiki and massage therapy, in hospital-based settings. Most controlled studies and practice-based reports include oncology and surgical patient populations; thus the effect in a more heterogeneous hospitalized patient population is hard to estimate. We examined the immediate symptom relief from a single reiki or massage session in a hospitalized population at a rural academic medical center. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on demographic, clinical, process, and quality of life for hospitalized patients receiving massage therapy or reiki. SETTINGS/LOCATION: A 396-bed rural academic and tertiary medical center in the United States. SUBJECTS: Hospitalized patients requesting or referred to the healing arts team who received either a massage or reiki session and completed both a pre- and post-therapy symptom questionnaire. INTERVENTIONS: First session of routine reiki or massage therapy during a hospital stay. OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences between pre- and postsession patient-reported scores in pain, nausea, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and overall well-being using an 11-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Patients reported symptom relief with both reiki and massage therapy. Analysis of the reported data showed reiki improved fatigue (-2.06 vs. -1.55 p < 0.0001) and anxiety (-2.21 vs. -1.84 p < 0.001) statistically more than massage. Pain, nausea, depression, and well being changes were not statistically different between reiki and massage encounters. Immediate symptom relief was similar for cancer and noncancer patients for both reiki and massage therapy and did not vary based on age, gender, length of session, and baseline symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Reiki and massage clinically provide similar improvements in pain, nausea, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and overall well-being while reiki improved fatigue and anxiety more than massage therapy in a heterogeneous hospitalized patient population. Controlled trials should be considered to validate the data.
OBJECTIVES: There is an increasing demand for and use of alternative and complementary therapies, such as reiki and massage therapy, in hospital-based settings. Most controlled studies and practice-based reports include oncology and surgical patient populations; thus the effect in a more heterogeneous hospitalized patient population is hard to estimate. We examined the immediate symptom relief from a single reiki or massage session in a hospitalized population at a rural academic medical center. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on demographic, clinical, process, and quality of life for hospitalized patients receiving massage therapy or reiki. SETTINGS/LOCATION: A 396-bed rural academic and tertiary medical center in the United States. SUBJECTS: Hospitalized patients requesting or referred to the healing arts team who received either a massage or reiki session and completed both a pre- and post-therapy symptom questionnaire. INTERVENTIONS: First session of routine reiki or massage therapy during a hospital stay. OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences between pre- and postsession patient-reported scores in pain, nausea, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and overall well-being using an 11-point Likert scale. RESULTS:Patients reported symptom relief with both reiki and massage therapy. Analysis of the reported data showed reiki improved fatigue (-2.06 vs. -1.55 p < 0.0001) and anxiety (-2.21 vs. -1.84 p < 0.001) statistically more than massage. Pain, nausea, depression, and well being changes were not statistically different between reiki and massage encounters. Immediate symptom relief was similar for cancer and noncancer patients for both reiki and massage therapy and did not vary based on age, gender, length of session, and baseline symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Reiki and massage clinically provide similar improvements in pain, nausea, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and overall well-being while reiki improved fatigue and anxiety more than massage therapy in a heterogeneous hospitalized patient population. Controlled trials should be considered to validate the data.
Authors: T A Ahles; D M Tope; B Pinkson; S Walch; D Hann; M Whedon; B Dain; J E Weiss; L Mills; P M Silberfarb Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Zachary R Hettinger; Yuan Wen; Bailey D Peck; Kyoko Hamagata; Amy L Confides; Douglas W Van Pelt; Douglas A Harrison; Benjamin F Miller; Timothy A Butterfield; Esther E Dupont-Versteegden Journal: Function (Oxf) Date: 2022-03-24