| Literature DB >> 29620625 |
Yujun Gao1, Jinou Zheng1, Yaping Li1, Danni Guo1, Mingli Wang1, Xiangxiang Cui1, Wei Ye2.
Abstract
Patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) often suffer from alertness alterations. However, specific regions connected with alertness remain controversial, and whether these regions have structural impairment is also elusive. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and neural mechanisms underlying the functions and structures of alertness network in patients with right-sided temporal lobe epilepsy (rTLE) by performing the attentional network test (ANT), resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (R-SfMRI), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).A total of 47 patients with rTLE and 34 healthy controls underwent ANT, R-SfMRI, and DTI scan. The seed-based functional connectivity (FC) method and deterministic tractography were used to analyze the data.Patients with rTLE had longer reaction times in the no-cue and double-cue conditions. However, no differences were noted in the alertness effect between the 2 groups. The patient group had lower FC compared with the control group in the right inferior parietal lobe (IPL), amygdala, and insula. Structural deficits were found in the right parahippocampal gyrus, superior temporal pole, insula, and amygdala in the patient group compared with the control group. Also significantly negative correlations were observed between abnormal fractional anisotropy (between the right insula and the superior temporal pole) and illness duration in the patients with rTLE.The findings of this study suggested abnormal intrinsic and phasic alertness, decreased FC, and structural deficits within the alerting network in the rTLE. This study provided new insights into the mechanisms of alertness alterations in rTLE.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29620625 PMCID: PMC5902293 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.889
Characteristics of the participants.
Figure 1Mean FC strength maps within the patient and control groups. One-sample t tests on individual FC values were conducted at each voxel. Correction for multiple comparisons was conducted based on the GRF theory (voxel significance: P < .001, cluster significance: P < .01). FC = functional connectivity.
Figure 2Statistical maps showing seed-based FC differences between the subject groups. Blue denotes lower FC values in the patients, and the color bar indicates the t values from two-sample t tests. Correction for multiple comparisons was conducted based on the GRF theory (voxel significance: P < .001, cluster significance: P < .05). FC = functional connectivity, GRF = Gaussian random field.
Significant differences in the FA, FL, and FN values between groups.
Figure 3Abnormal tracks between right insula and right superior temporal pole and significantly negative correlations between abnormal FA values (right insula and right superior temporal pole) and illness duration in the patients with rTLE. FA = fractional anisotropy, TLE = temporal lobe epilepsy.