| Literature DB >> 29619864 |
Lei Zhang1,2, Xiu-Ping Chen1, He Qin1, Ling Jiang1, Yuan-Han Qin1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this research, we explored the molecular mechanism of proteinuria in glomerulosclerosis rats and the protective effects of ATRA.Entities:
Keywords: ATRA; TRPC6; glomerulosclerosis; proteinuria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29619864 PMCID: PMC6014515 DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2018.1456459
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ren Fail ISSN: 0886-022X Impact factor: 2.606
Figure 1.Morphological characteristics of glomerulus under light microscopy in three groups. Collagen deposition was markedly observed in the GS group when compared with the SHO group. The pathological changes in the ATRA group were remarkably reduced when compared with those in GS group. SHO: sham operation group; GS: GS model group; ATRA: GS model group treated with ATRA. All PAS, ×400.
Figure 2.Electron microscopic evaluation of changes in glomerular. The GS group showed that basement membrane thickness varies, foot process diffuse fusion, disappear. The ATRA group presents fewer lesions than the GS group. Magnification 30000×.
Biochemical parameters in each group.
| Scr (μmol/L) | BUN (mmol/L) | 24-h proteinuria (mg) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | 0 week | 12 weeks | 0 week | 12 weeks | 0 week | 12 weeks | |
| SHO | 20 | 34.7 ± 2.3 | 35.2 ± 3.2 | 7.1 ± 0.7 | 7.6 ± 0.8 | 9.5 ± 2.8 | 10.5 ± 3.1 |
| GS | 20 | 35.1 ± 2.3 | 56.6 ± 4.2 | 7.4 ± 0.5 | 13.9 ± 1.5 | 8.7 ± 2.3 | 51.7 ± 7.2 |
| ATRA | 20 | 35.4 ± 2.7 | 43.7 ± 4.1 | 7.6 ± 0.6 | 7.9 ± 1.3 | 8.8 ± 2.1 | 26.8 ± 3.9 |
p < .05, significantly different from the SHO group at the same time.
p < .05 significantly different from the GS group at the same time.
Figure 3.The typical immunohistochemical staining of TGF-β, Col-IV and TRPC6 in glomerulus in three groups. Stainings for TGF-β, Col-IV, and TRPC6 in the GS group were markedly increased when compared with those in the SHO group. The positive stainings of TGF-β, Col-IV, and TRPC6 in the ATRA group were markedly reduced when compared with the GS group. SHO: sham operation group; GS: GS model group; ATRA: GS model group treated with ATRA. Magnification 400×.
Figure 4.Evaluation of protein expression of TRPC6 (Western-blot). ※ p < .05 compared with the SHO group, △ p < .05 compared with the ATRA group.