Literature DB >> 29619578

Efficiency Improvement in a Busy Radiology Practice: Determination of Musculoskeletal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol Using Deep-Learning Convolutional Neural Networks.

Young Han Lee1.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study are to evaluate the feasibility of protocol determination with a convolutional neural networks (CNN) classifier based on short-text classification and to evaluate the agreements by comparing protocols determined by CNN with those determined by musculoskeletal radiologists. Following institutional review board approval, the database of a hospital information system (HIS) was queried for lists of MRI examinations, referring department, patient age, and patient gender. These were exported to a local workstation for analyses: 5258 and 1018 consecutive musculoskeletal MRI examinations were used for the training and test datasets, respectively. The subjects for pre-processing were routine or tumor protocols and the contents were word combinations of the referring department, region, contrast media (or not), gender, and age. The CNN Embedded vector classifier was used with Word2Vec Google news vectors. The test set was tested with each classification model and results were output as routine or tumor protocols. The CNN determinations were evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The accuracies were evaluated by a radiologist-confirmed protocol as the reference protocols. The optimal cut-off values for protocol determination between routine protocols and tumor protocols was 0.5067 with a sensitivity of 92.10%, a specificity of 95.76%, and an area under curve (AUC) of 0.977. The overall accuracy was 94.2% for the ConvNet model. All MRI protocols were correct in the pelvic bone, upper arm, wrist, and lower leg MRIs. Deep-learning-based convolutional neural networks were clinically utilized to determine musculoskeletal MRI protocols. CNN-based text learning and applications could be extended to other radiologic tasks besides image interpretations, improving the work performance of the radiologist.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial neural networks; Image protocols; Machine learning; Magnetic resonance imaging protocol

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29619578      PMCID: PMC6148815          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-018-0066-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  14 in total

1.  Detection and Labeling of Vertebrae in MR Images Using Deep Learning with Clinical Annotations as Training Data.

Authors:  Daniel Forsberg; Erik Sjöblom; Jeffrey L Sunshine
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  MRI: time is dose--and money and versatility.

Authors:  William A Edelstein; Mahadevappa Mahesh; John A Carrino
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Pulmonary Nodule Detection in CT Images: False Positive Reduction Using Multi-View Convolutional Networks.

Authors:  Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio; Francesco Ciompi; Geert Litjens; Paul Gerke; Colin Jacobs; Sarah J van Riel; Mathilde Marie Winkler Wille; Matiullah Naqibullah; Clara I Sanchez; Bram van Ginneken
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Automatic Determination of the Need for Intravenous Contrast in Musculoskeletal MRI Examinations Using IBM Watson's Natural Language Processing Algorithm.

Authors:  Hari Trivedi; Joseph Mesterhazy; Benjamin Laguna; Thienkhai Vu; Jae Ho Sohn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Patient Recall Imaging in the Ambulatory Setting.

Authors:  Soterios Gyftopoulos; Danny Kim; Eric Aaltonen; Leora I Horwitz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Laterality errors in radiology reports generated with and without voice recognition software: frequency and clinical significance.

Authors:  Marianne T Luetmer; Christopher H Hunt; Robert J McDonald; Brian J Bartholmai; David F Kallmes
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks in MRI Images.

Authors:  Sergio Pereira; Adriano Pinto; Victor Alves; Carlos A Silva
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Combo acquisitions: balancing scan time reduction and image quality.

Authors:  Ralf Mekle; Ed X Wu; Stephan Meckel; Stephan G Wetzel; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Errare humanum est: frequency of laterality errors in radiology reports.

Authors:  Minal Jagtiani Sangwaiya; Shyla Saini; Michael A Blake; Keith J Dreyer; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Genomic selection using regularized linear regression models: ridge regression, lasso, elastic net and their extensions.

Authors:  Joseph O Ogutu; Torben Schulz-Streeck; Hans-Peter Piepho
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2012-05-21
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Current applications and future directions of deep learning in musculoskeletal radiology.

Authors:  Pauley Chea; Jacob C Mandell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence in Musculoskeletal Imaging: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Soterios Gyftopoulos; Dana Lin; Florian Knoll; Ankur M Doshi; Tatiane Cantarelli Rodrigues; Michael P Recht
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Overview of Noninterpretive Artificial Intelligence Models for Safety, Quality, Workflow, and Education Applications in Radiology Practice.

Authors:  Yasasvi Tadavarthi; Valeria Makeeva; William Wagstaff; Henry Zhan; Anna Podlasek; Neil Bhatia; Marta Heilbrun; Elizabeth Krupinski; Nabile Safdar; Imon Banerjee; Judy Gichoya; Hari Trivedi
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-02-02

4.  Natural Language Processing for Imaging Protocol Assignment: Machine Learning for Multiclass Classification of Abdominal CT Protocols Using Indication Text Data.

Authors:  Brian Arun Xavier; Po-Hao Chen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.903

Review 5.  Automated Protocoling for MRI Exams-Challenges and Solutions.

Authors:  Jonas Denck; Oliver Haas; Jens Guehring; Andreas Maier; Eva Rothgang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.903

6.  Convolutional neural network-automated hepatobiliary phase adequacy evaluation may optimize examination time.

Authors:  Guilherme Moura Cunha; Kyle A Hasenstab; Atsushi Higaki; Kang Wang; Timo Delgado; Ryan L Brunsing; Alexandra Schlein; Armin Schwartzman; Albert Hsiao; Claude B Sirlin; Katie J Fowler
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence in paediatric radiology: Future opportunities.

Authors:  Natasha Davendralingam; Neil J Sebire; Owen J Arthurs; Susan C Shelmerdine
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Residual convolutional neural network for predicting response of transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma from CT imaging.

Authors:  Jie Peng; Shuai Kang; Zhengyuan Ning; Hangxia Deng; Jingxian Shen; Yikai Xu; Jing Zhang; Wei Zhao; Xinling Li; Wuxing Gong; Jinhua Huang; Li Liu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  AI musculoskeletal clinical applications: how can AI increase my day-to-day efficiency?

Authors:  YiRang Shin; Sungjun Kim; Young Han Lee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries.

Authors:  Jason Corban; Justin-Pierre Lorange; Carl Laverdiere; Jason Khoury; Gil Rachevsky; Mark Burman; Paul Andre Martineau
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.