Literature DB >> 29619562

A preliminary study of 3.0-T magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Fulong Dong1,2, Yuanyuan Wu3, Peiwen Song1,2, Yinfeng Qian4, Ying Wang4, Liyan Xu4, Minmin Yin4, Renjie Zhang1,2, Hui Tao1,2, Peng Ge1,2, Chang Liu1,2, Huaqing Zhang1,2, Jinwen Zhu5, Cailiang Shen6,7, Yongqiang Yu8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters of the spinal cord between patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and normal subjects, and investigate their significance in the clinical diagnosis, surgical planning and post-operative evaluation of CSM.
METHODS: Routine sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and DTI scans were performed in 50 normal subjects and 60 cases of CSM with 3.0-T MR. DTI images, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) colormaps corresponding to spinal cord cross-sections were obtained. The spinal cord function of CSM patients was measured using modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scoring and Nurick grade at different times. The changes in DTI parameters and their correlation with spinal cord function scores were analysed by SPSS 19.
RESULTS: There were significant differences in DTI parameters of the spinal cord between normal subjects and patients with CSM (ADC: 1.119 ± 0.087 vs. 1.395 ± 0.091, P < 0.01; FA: 0.661 ± 0.057 vs. 0.420 ± 0.080, P < 0.01). The FA values at the maximal compression level of the spinal cord in the patients with CSM were significantly associated with the mJOA score pre-operatively, 1 week, and 1, 3 and 6 months post-operatively, with Pearson's correlation coefficients of 0.58 (P < 0.01), 0.53 (P < 0.05), and 0.51 (P < 0.05), 0.54 (P < 0.05) and 0.55 (P < 0.05), respectively. However, the FA values were significantly negatively associated with the Nurick grade, with Pearson's correlation coefficients of - 0.40 (P < 0.05), - 0.39 (P < 0.05), and -0.41 (P < 0.05), - 0.45 (P < 0.05) and - 0.44 (P < 0.05), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: DTI may play a significant role in diagnosing and predicting the development of CSM. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Diffusion tensor imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Spinal cord; Spinal cord function scores

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29619562     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5579-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  20 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spondylosis anatomy: pathophysiology and biomechanics.

Authors:  Daniel Shedid; Edward C Benzel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Risk factors for development of myelopathy in patients with cervical spondylotic cord compression.

Authors:  Shunji Matsunaga; Setsuro Komiya; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The role of DTI in early detection of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary study with 3-T MRI.

Authors:  Batuhan Kara; Azim Celik; Selhan Karadereler; Levent Ulusoy; Kursat Ganiyusufoglu; Levent Onat; Ayhan Mutlu; Ibrahim Ornek; Mustafa Sirvanci; Azmi Hamzaoglu
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Measurement of volume-occupying rate of cervical spinal canal and its role in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Fulong Dong; Cailiang Shen; Shu Jiang; Renjie Zhang; Peiwen Song; Yongqiang Yu; Shiyu Wang; Xiaohu Li; Gang Zhao; Changhai Ding
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Correlation of force control with regional spinal DTI in patients with cervical spondylosis without signs of spinal cord injury on conventional MRI.

Authors:  Påvel G Lindberg; Katherine Sanchez; Fidan Ozcan; François Rannou; Serge Poiraudeau; Antoine Feydy; Marc A Maier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Comparison of Nurick grading system and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system in evaluation of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Kumbhar Kartik Revanappa; Vedantam Rajshekhar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-20       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Validation of a translated version of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association score to assess outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an approach to globalize outcomes assessment tools.

Authors:  Ronald H M A Bartels; André L M Verbeek; Edward C Benzel; Michael G Fehlings; Bernard H Guiot
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 8.  Pathophysiology of cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Darryl C Baptiste; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Reevaluation of the Pavlov ratio in patients with cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Kyung-Soo Suk; Ki-Tack Kim; Jung-Hee Lee; Sang-Hun Lee; Jin-Soo Kim; Jin-Young Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-02-06

10.  The relationship between the cervical spinal canal diameter and the pathological changes in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Yuichiro Morishita; Masatoshi Naito; Henry Hymanson; Masashi Miyazaki; Guizhong Wu; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  8 in total

1.  Apparent diffusion coefficient as an indicator of spinal cord compression due to anterior atlanto-axial subluxation in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Małgorzata Mańczak; Grzegorz Pracoń; Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska; Robert Gasik
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Changes and clinical correlation of diffusion tensor imaging parameters of compressed spinal cord and nerve root in patients with cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  Shuo Liang; Feng Yang; Yang Zhang; Huiyu Zhao; Xinyue Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 2.795

3.  Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: How to Identify the Best Responders to Surgery?

Authors:  Rocco Severino; Aria Nouri; Enrico Tessitore
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  The Correlation between Functional Connectivity of the Primary Somatosensory Cortex and Cervical Spinal Cord Microstructural Injury in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Guoshu Zhao; Chenlei Zhang; Yaru Zhan; Laichang He
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.434

5.  The Functional Relevance of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Stefania d'Avanzo; Marco Ciavarro; Luigi Pavone; Gabriele Pasqua; Francesco Ricciardi; Marcello Bartolo; Domenico Solari; Teresa Somma; Oreste de Divitiis; Paolo Cappabianca; Gualtiero Innocenzi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging reveals tract-specific microstructural correlates of electrophysiological impairments in non-myelopathic and myelopathic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Jan Valošek; René Labounek; Tomáš Horák; Magda Horáková; Petr Bednařík; Miloš Keřkovský; Jan Kočica; Tomáš Rohan; Christophe Lenglet; Julien Cohen-Adad; Petr Hluštík; Eva Vlčková; Zdeněk Kadaňka; Josef Bednařík; Alena Svatkova
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 6.288

7.  Quantitative Evaluation of the Diffusion Tensor Imaging Matrix Parameters and the Subsequent Correlation with the Clinical Assessment of Disease Severity in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Neha Nischal; Shalini Tripathi; Jatinder Pal Singh
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2020-11-16

8.  A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Current Research Trends in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Mengchen Yin; Chongqing Xu; Junming Ma; Jie Ye; Wen Mo
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-09-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.