| Literature DB >> 29619439 |
Endang Suprihati1, Muchammad Yunus1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The development of vaccine to control coccidiosis caused by Eimeria tenella (E. tenella) in chickens is intensifying because of the increasing threat of drug resistance to anticoccidial agents. It is important, therefore, to develop a reliable standard method for the assessment of vaccine afficacy particularly antigenicity and immunogenicity become crucial. Evaluation of E. tenella antigenicity and immunogenicity to some low doses can be reflected by reproductive index and histopathological changes.Entities:
Keywords: E.tenella; antigenicity; histopthological changes; immunogenicity; reproductive index
Year: 2018 PMID: 29619439 PMCID: PMC5876782 DOI: 10.2101/Ajid.12v1S.15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr J Infect Dis ISSN: 2006-0165
Figure 1Pattern of daily oocyst production of E. tenella for primary infection and challenge infection of each chicken group, reduction of peak level of oocyst production represented the presence of protective immunity after primary infection, except uninfected chicken group on primary infection (negative control group).
Figure 2The comparison of total oocysts production of E. tenella between primary infection (initial infection) and challenge infection. Reduction of oocyst production indicated well development of protective immunity after primary infection. Each value represents mean ± SD of 5 chicks. NS, Not Significant; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05
Percentage of reduction of total of oocyst production and reproductive index on challenge infection after primary infection of each chicken group expressed development of protective immunity
| Chicken Groups | From Primary to Challenge Infection | |
|---|---|---|
| Total Oocyst Production (%) | Reproductive Index[ | |
| Group 1 | NC | NC |
| Group 2 | 68.61 | 96.86 |
| Group 3 | 92.7 | 98.54 |
| Group 4 | 96.22 | 98.86 |
Reproductive Index = number of oocysts produced divided by number of oocysts inoculated; NC, Not compared
Figure 3Representative histological images of cecum at 5 days following E. tenella infection (primary and challenge infections). Comparison of morphology of endogenous development stages of E. tenella between primary infection (G1, G2, G3, G4) and challenge infection (G1-c, G2-c, G3-c, G4-c) chicken. G1, part of damaged cecal mucosa and erupted cecal epithelial cells; G1-c, few erupted cecal mucosa post primary infection; G2, bleeding with erythrocytes inside and damaged cecal mucosa; G2-c, limited damaged cecal mucosa epithelial cell and there was degenerated parasite and automatically there were no bleeding in cecum; G3, erupted cecal mucosa epithelial cell; G3-c, most intact cecal mucosa; G4, well development many intracellular schizonts containing merozoites and immature macrogametocytes in the border epithelial cells of cecum; G4-c, schizont appeared degenerated consequently un-break schizont 3. H&E stain, objective ×40 (image G1, G1-c, G2, G2-c, G3, G3-c, G4, G4-c). Arrow showed histomorphological endogenous development, bleeding, erupted cecal mucosa and cecal epithelial cells.