Literature DB >> 29619358

Forces Required to Pull the Superficial Fascia in Facelifts.

Jin Suk Byun1, Kun Hwang2, Sang Yun Lee1, Jae Min Song1, Hun Kim2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to characterize the histology of the sideburn and cheek area and to measure the force required to pull the superficial fascia (SF) of Asians in facelift procedures.
METHODS: The hemiface of a formalin-fixed Korean male adult cadaver (77 years old) was used to study the histology of the sideburn and cheek area. In 42 patients during facelift procedures, the force needed to pull the overlying skin at the midpoint between the sideburn and nasolabial fold 2 mm was measured using a tensiometer.
RESULTS: In the cheek, the superficial fatty layer of the superficial fascia (SFS) was found to maintain its thickness throughout the region between the dermis and the membranous layer of the superficial fascia (MSF). The MSF was continuous with the superficial temporal fascia (STF). In the sideburn, the MSF and parotid fascia closely adhered to each other. The force required to move the overlying skin 2 mm when pulling the MSF (10.27 ± 3.64 N) was more than twice as great (217%) as the force required when pulling the SFS (4.73 ± 2.15 N; P < .001). The forces required when pulling the MSF and SFS to move the overlying skin 2 mm were significantly greater in the sideburn area (11.56 ± 3.37 N and 5.52 ± 2.08 N, respectively) than in the cheek area (8.97 ± 3.43 N and 5.52 ± 2.08 N, respectively; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: When lifting the SF at the cheek or sideburn area, lifting the SFS requires less tension than MSF to move the overlying skin. In the cheek area, less tension is needed to move the overlying skin than in the sideburn area.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomy and histology; fascia; rhytidoplasty; subcutaneous tissue

Year:  2018        PMID: 29619358      PMCID: PMC5871114          DOI: 10.1177/2292550317747853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)        ISSN: 2292-5503            Impact factor:   0.947


  9 in total

1.  Rhytidectomy with lateral SMASectomy.

Authors:  D Baker
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.446

2.  Thickness of skin and subcutaneous tissue of the free flap donor sites: A histologic study.

Authors:  Kun Hwang; Hun Kim; Dae Joong Kim
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.425

3.  Anatomical study of subcutaneous adipofascial tissue: a concept of the protective adipofascial system (PAFS) and lubricant adipofascial system (LAFS).

Authors:  Hideo Nakajima; Nobuaki Imanishi; Toshiharu Minabe; Kazuo Kishi; Sadakazu Aiso
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg       Date:  2004

4.  Lateral SMASectomy, plication and short scar facelifts: indications and techniques.

Authors:  Daniel C Baker
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.017

5.  Surgical anatomy of the middle premasseter space and its application in sub-SMAS face lift surgery.

Authors:  Bryan C Mendelson; Chin-Ho Wong
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Histotopographic study of the fibroadipose connective cheek system.

Authors:  Veronica Macchi; Cesare Tiengo; Andrea Porzionato; Carla Stecco; Enrico Vigato; Anna Parenti; Bruno Azzena; Andreas Weiglein; Francesco Mazzoleni; Raffaele De Caro
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.481

7.  The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area.

Authors:  V Mitz; M Peyronie
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Superficial Fascia (SF) in the Cheek and Parotid Area: Histology and Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI).

Authors:  Kun Hwang; Hun Kim; Dae Joong Kim; Yeo Ju Kim; Young Hye Kang
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 9.  The Anterior SMAS Approach for Facelifting and for Buccal Fat Pad Removal.

Authors:  Malcolm D Paul
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.326

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.