| Literature DB >> 29619309 |
Jian Sun1, Ruochen Lan2, Yanzi Gao2, Meng Wang2, Wanshu Zhang1, Ling Wang3, Lanying Zhang2,4, Zhou Yang1, Huai Yang2,4.
Abstract
Dynamic controllability of self-organized helical superstructures in spatial dimensions is a key step to promote bottom-up artificial nanoarchitectures and functional devices for diverse applications in a variety of areas. Here, a light-driven chiral overcrowded alkene molecular motor with rod-like substituent is designed and synthesized, and its thermal isomerization reaction exhibits an increasing structural entropy effect on chemical kinetic analysis in anisotropic achiral liquid crystal host than that in isotropic organic liquid. Interestingly, the stimuli-directed angular orientation motion of helical axes in the self-organized helical superstructures doped with the chiral motors enables the dynamic reconfiguration between the planar (thermostationary) and focal conic (photostationary) states. The reversible micromorphology deformation processes are compatible with the free energy fluctuation of self-organized helical superstructures and the chemical kinetics of chiral motors under different conditions. Furthermore, stimuli-directed reversible nonmechanical beam steering is achieved in dynamic hidden periodic photopatterns with reconfigurable attributes prerecorded with a corresponding photomask and photoinduced polymerization.Entities:
Keywords: adaptive materials; chemical kinetics; dynamic reconfiguration; helical superstructures; self organization
Year: 2017 PMID: 29619309 PMCID: PMC5827101 DOI: 10.1002/advs.201700613
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1a) Photoisomerization and thermal inversion of chiral motors M1 with methyl benzoate substituent at 6‐Position. b) Schematic mechanism of reversibly dynamic reconfiguration of motor‐doped self‐organized helical superstructures between (i) homogeneous helical axis at planar state with thermal relaxation and (ii) random helical axis at focal conic state upon UV irradiation.
Figure 2a) UV–vis absorption spectra of P ‐M1 and M ‐M1 in THF (40 µm) at room temperature. b) Unstable to stable absorption kinetics for M1 at 450 nm at the specified temperatures. c) Erying plot for the thermodynamic inversion from unstable M ‐M1 to stable P ‐M1 isomer and the associated thermal kinetic parameters in THF. d) Crossed polarized optical texture of 1.0 wt% M1 in SLC1717 in a wedge cell at the thermostationary state and the photostationary state. The scale bar represents 100 µm. e) HTP change of M1 (1.0 wt% in SLC1717) and the corresponding molar fraction of M form during thermodynamic inversion at the specified temperatures. f) Erying plot for the thermodynamic inversion from unstable M ‐M1 to stable P ‐M1 isomer and the associated thermal kinetic parameters in LCs.
Figure 3Stimuli‐induced configurational transition of M1‐doped CLC (8.5 wt% M1 and 0.8 wt% S811 in SLC1717). a) POM images in reversible dynamic process: (i) planar reconfiguration, (ii) FC reconfiguration and (iii,iv) shrinking of the defect lines in dark relaxation. b) Photographs of the transparent state and the opaque state with a “star” pattern, respectively. c) Time‐resolved transmittance at 633 nm at different intensity of UV irradiation for 600 s and then dark relaxation at room temperature for 1800 s.
Figure 4a) Photodynamic transmittance measurement (633 nm) of M1‐doped CLC with different concentration of racemic motor M1 at 80.0 mW cm−2 and b) the corresponding thermodynamic process at room temperature. c) Thermodynamic transmittance measurement (633 nm) of M1‐doped CLC at different annealing temperature.
Figure 5a) Optical microscopy image of the stripe photomask for fabricating the motor‐doped PSCLC grating. POM images of the M1‐doped PSCLC with b) homogeneous planar configuration at the TSS and c) binary pattern (alternate planar and FC configuration) at the PSS. Diffraction patterns of laser beam (λ = 633 nm) at the “off” and “on” states on underside. d) Transmittance spectra of the M1‐doped PSCLC at the TSS and the PSS, respectively. e) Schematic illustrations of reversibly dynamical PSCLC grating at the corresponding states. f) POM images of PSCLC grating during photodynamic evolution at 80.0 mW cm−2 and g) thermodynamic evolution at room temperature.
Figure 6a) Temporal evolution of diffraction pattern for M1‐doped PSCLC grating in photodynamic process and b) thermodynamic process. c) The rise response time of first‐order diffraction efficiency for M1‐doped PSCLC with different concentration of racemic motor M1 at 80.0 mW cm−2. d) The decay response time of M1‐doped PSCLC at different annealing temperature.