| Literature DB >> 29619088 |
Changzheng Wu1,2,3,4, Feng Zhang1,2,4, Lijun Li1,2,3, Zhedong Jiang1,2,3, Hui Ni1,2,3, Anfeng Xiao1,2,3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High amounts of insoluble substrates exist in the traditional solid-state fermentation (SSF) system. The presence of these substrates complicates the determination of microbial biomass. Thus, enzyme activity is used as the sole index for the optimization of the traditional SSF system, and the relationship between microbial growth and enzyme synthesis is always ignored. This study was conducted to address this deficiency. All soluble nutrients from tea stalk were extracted using water. The aqueous extract was then mixed with polyurethane sponge to establish a modified SSF system, which was then used to conduct tannase production. With this system, biomass, enzyme activity, and enzyme productivity could be measured rationally and accurately. Thus, the association between biomass and enzyme activity could be easily identified, and the shortcomings of traditional SSF could be addressed.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus tubingensis; Biomass; Solid-state fermentation; Tannase
Year: 2018 PMID: 29619088 PMCID: PMC5879601 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-018-1093-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Variables and levels of the Box–Behnken experiment
| Variables | Levels of variables | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code | − 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Tannin (%) | A | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| Glucose (%) | B | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| (NH4)2SO4 (%) | C | 6 | 9 | 12 |
| Yeast extract (%) | D | 1 | 3.5 | 6 |
Experimental design and corresponding responses of the Box–Behnken experiment
| Standard order |
|
|
|
| Tannase activity (U/gds) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental value | Predicted value | |||||
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 3.5 | 3.63 | 3.73 |
| 2 | 9 | 3 | 9 | 3.5 | 4.13 | 4.84 |
| 3 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 3.5 | 10.07 | 9.01 |
| 4 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 3.5 | 14.60 | 14.15 |
| 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 12.46 | 11.91 |
| 6 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 1 | 11.88 | 11.57 |
| 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8.57 | 8.53 |
| 8 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 6 | 8.60 | 8.81 |
| 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 8.70 | 8.70 |
| 10 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 12.80 | 12.80 |
| 11 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 6.77 | 6.61 |
| 12 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 8.92 | 8.76 |
| 13 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 3.5 | 6.49 | 5.48 |
| 14 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 3.5 | 11.93 | 12.38 |
| 15 | 6 | 3 | 12 | 3.5 | 5.68 | 5.06 |
| 16 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 3.5 | 11.90 | 12.75 |
| 17 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 3.5 | 7.24 | 8.12 |
| 18 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 3.5 | 10.07 | 10.34 |
| 19 | 3 | 6 | 12 | 3.5 | 6.95 | 7.19 |
| 20 | 9 | 6 | 12 | 3.5 | 11.60 | 11.23 |
| 21 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 6.48 | 7.07 |
| 22 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 13.57 | 13.84 |
| 23 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 3.24 | 3.47 |
| 24 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 11.38 | 11.30 |
| 25 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 3.5 | 12.89 | 13.38 |
| 26 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 3.5 | 13.79 | 13.38 |
| 27 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 3.5 | 13.75 | 13.38 |
| 28 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 3.5 | 13.09 | 13.38 |
| 29 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 3.5 | 13.35 | 13.38 |
Fig. 1Effects of the parameters on tannase production. a Side length of PUS, b Content of tea stalk extract, c Temperature, d pH, and e Inoculum; the provided values are the mean ± standard deviation of three experiments
Effect of different parameters on microbial growth and enzyme synthesis
| Research parameters | Maximum tannase activity (U/gds) | Maximum biomass (mg/gds) | Maximum tannase productivity (U/gdc) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Side length of PUS | 4.8 (0.2 cm) | 67.3 (0.2 cm) | 71.4 (0.2 cm) |
| Extract content | 5.2 (95%) | 116.1 (95%) | 45.2 (90%) |
| Initial pH | 3.2 (4) | 70.2 (4) | 54.7 (4) |
| Inoculum size | 3.9 (6.4 × 107 spores/gds) | 176.0 (25.6 × 107 spores/gds) | 58.5 (0.4 × 107 spores/gds) |
| Temperature | 3.0 (30 °C) | 80.1 (30 °C) | 38.6 (30 °C) |
Data in brackets denote the parameter conditions to achieve maximum microbial growth or enzyme synthesis
Fig. 2Effects of inorganic salts on tannase production. a NaCl, b MgSO4, and c K2HPO4; the provided values are the mean ± standard deviation of three experiments
Fig. 3Effect of additional and combined carbon sources on tannase production. a Different kinds of additional carbon sources, b Additional tannin with 6% glucose, and c Additional glucose with 6% tannin; the provided values are the mean ± standard deviation of three experiments
Fig. 4Effect of additional and combined nitrogen sources on tannase production. a Different kinds of additional nitrogen sources, b Additional (NH4)2SO4, and c Additional yeast extract with 6% (NH4)2SO4; the provided values are the mean ± standard deviation of three experiments
ANOVA for the response surface quadratic model
| Term | Tannase activity |
|---|---|
| 310.99 | |
| < 0.0001 | |
| Mean | 9.81 |
|
| 0.9785 |
| Adj. | 0.9569 |
| Pred. | 0.8843 |
| C.V. (%) | 7.13 |
| Adeq precision | 21.227 |
| PRESS | 36.78 |
ANOVA results of the Box–Behnken design
| Source | Sum of squares | Degree of freedom | Mean square | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 310.99 | 14 | 22.21 | 45.43 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 29.31 | 1 | 29.31 | 59.95 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 159.67 | 1 | 159.67 | 326.56 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 1.752E−003 | 1 | 1.752E−003 | 3.583E−003 | 0.9531 |
|
| 28.23 | 1 | 28.23 | 57.73 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 4.05 | 1 | 4.05 | 8.28 | 0.0122 |
|
| 0.83 | 1 | 0.83 | 1.70 | 0.2129 |
|
| 0.96 | 1 | 0.96 | 1.96 | 0.1828 |
|
| 0.15 | 1 | 0.15 | 0.31 | 0.5858 |
|
| 0.28 | 1 | 0.28 | 0.56 | 0.4652 |
|
| 0.096 | 1 | 0.096 | 0.20 | 0.6643 |
|
| 42.89 | 1 | 42.89 | 87.72 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 53.45 | 1 | 53.45 | 109.31 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 16.29 | 1 | 16.29 | 33.32 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 16.31 | 1 | 16.31 | 33.36 | < 0.0001 |
| Residual | 6.85 | 14 | 0.49 | ||
| Lack of fit | 6.21 | 10 | 0.62 | 3.93 | 0.0994 |
| Pure error | 0.63 | 4 | 0.16 | ||
| Cor total | 317.84 | 28 |
Fig. 5Optimization of carbon and nitrogen sources content by RSM using Box–Behnken design. a Interaction of tannin and glucose. b Interaction of tannin and (NH4)2SO4. c Interaction of tannin and yeast extract. d Interaction of glucose and (NH4)2SO4. e Interaction of glucose and yeast extract. f Interaction of (NH4)2SO4 and yeast extract
Fig. 6Application in modified SSF system and the traditional tea stalk SSF system. a Cell growth and enzyme activity in the modified SSF system. b Tannase productivity in the modified SSF system. c Comparison of tannase production reported by a previous study and that reported by the present study in the traditional tea stalk SSF system. Note: A: Maximum tannase activity under the optimized conditions with A. niger JMU-TS528 in a previous study [13]; B: Maximum tannase activity under the optimized conditions with A. tubingensis in a previous study [26]; C: Maximum tannase activity under the optimized conditions with A. tubingensis in the previous study