| Literature DB >> 29619084 |
Xuping Feng1, Chenliang Yu2, Xiaodan Liu1, Yunfeng Chen1, Hong Zhen1, Kuichuan Sheng1, Yong He1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the pursuit of sources of energy, biofuel pellet is emerging as a promising resource because of its easy storage and transport, and lower pollution to the environment. The composition of biomass has important implication for energy conversion processing strategies. Current standard chemical methods for biomass composition are laborious, time-consuming, and unsuitable for high-throughput analysis. Therefore, a reliable and efficient method is needed for determining lignocellulose composition in biomass and so to accelerate biomass utilization. Here, near-infrared hyperspectral imaging (900-1700 nm) together with chemometrics was used to determine the lignocellulose components in different types of biofuel pellets. Partial least-squares regression and principal component multiple linear regression models based on whole wavelengths and optimal wavelengths were employed and compared for predicting lignocellulose composition.Entities:
Keywords: Biofuel pellet; Biomass; Hyperspectral imaging; Image processing analysis; Lignocellulose components; Wavelength selection
Year: 2018 PMID: 29619084 PMCID: PMC5879804 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-018-1090-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Configuration of the hyperspectral imaging system and flowchart of hyperspectral image segmentation
Statistical description of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin concentrations for calibration and prediction sets
| Indices | Cellulose (%) | Hemicellulose (%) | Lignin (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calibration | Prediction | Calibration | Prediction | Calibration | Prediction | |
| Number | 111 | 37 | 111 | 37 | 111 | 37 |
| Maximum | 64.56 | 61 | 30.98 | 30.56 | 29.12 | 27.24 |
| Minimum | 18.94 | 21.44 | 11.12 | 11.98 | 13.87 | 14.32 |
| Mean | 49.14 | 49.31 | 18.42 | 18.5 | 20.25 | 20.28 |
| Standard deviation | 7.72 | 8.55 | 3.76 | 3.76 | 3.57 | 3.57 |
Fig. 2Reflectance obtained with no pre-treatment and three pre-processed spectra within wavelengths 958–1683 nm. a No pre-treatment; b standard normal variate (SNV); c second derivative (2nd derivative); and d multiplicative scatter correction (MSC)
Prediction results of the pre-processing models constructed by partial least-squares regression (PLSR) and principal component multiple linear regression (PC-MLR) for lignocellulose components of biomass pellets
| Indices | Model type | Pre-processing | Para | Calibration set | Prediction set | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| RMSEC (%) |
| RMSEP (%) | ||||
| Cellulose | PC-MLR | Raw | 29 | 0.93 | 2.21 | 0.91 | 2.49 |
| SNV | 21 | 0.86 | 3.19 | 0.87 | 2.95 | ||
| 2nd | 45 | 0.93 | 2.26 | 0.79 | 3.82 | ||
| MSC | 21 | 0.84 | 3.39 | 0.85 | 3.27 | ||
| PLSR | Raw | 10 | 0.91 | 2.64 | 0.91 | 2.51 | |
| SNV | 11 | 0.84 | 3.36 | 0.83 | 3.39 | ||
| 2nd | 2 | 0.61 | 5.23 | 0.61 | 5.23 | ||
| MSC | 10 | 0.83 | 3.56 | 0.81 | 3.63 | ||
| Hemicellulose | PC-MLR | Raw | 21 | 0.83 | 1.54 | 0.79 | 1.68 |
| SNV | 16 | 0.81 | 1.61 | 0.83 | 1.53 | ||
| 2nd | 45 | 0.87 | 1.36 | 0.78 | 1.74 | ||
| MSC | 18 | 0.80 | 1.66 | 0.78 | 1.73 | ||
| PLSR | Raw | 12 | 0.82 | 1.54 | 0.80 | 1.86 | |
| SNV | 10 | 0.81 | 1.60 | 0.82 | 1.58 | ||
| 2nd | 9 | 0.83 | 1.56 | 0.76 | 1.83 | ||
| MSC | 7 | 0.72 | 1.95 | 0.59 | 2.67 | ||
| Lignin | PC-MLR | Raw | 38 | 0.88 | 1.19 | 0.75 | 1.75 |
| SNV | 21 | 0.71 | 1.90 | 0.60 | 2.23 | ||
| 2nd | 32 | 0.85 | 1.30 | 0.74 | 1.78 | ||
| MSC | 13 | 0.61 | 2.23 | 0.52 | 2.44 | ||
| PLSR | Raw | 13 | 0.86 | 1.31 | 0.74 | 1.79 | |
| SNV | 8 | 0.61 | 2.20 | 0.46 | 2.58 | ||
| 2nd | 16 | 0.82 | 1.47 | 0.71 | 1.87 | ||
| MSC | 6 | 0.58 | 2.28 | 0.45 | 2.61 | ||
a Model parameters indicate the optimal number of latent variables for establishing the PLSR calibration model and optimal number of principal components for PC-MLR; and , coefficients of determination for calibration and prediction sets, respectively; RMSEC and RMSEP, root mean square errors of calibration and prediction sets, respectively; SNV, standard normal variate; 2nd, second derivative; MSC, multiplicative scatter correction
Fig. 3Selection of optimal wavelengths by successive projections algorithm. Distributions of important variables (marked with ‘filled circle’) for cellulose (a), hemicellulose (b) and lignin (c); final number of selected variables for cellulose (d), hemicellulose (e) and lignin (f) determined on the basis of the root mean square error (RMSE) of validation set of multiple linear regression models
Result of PLSR and PC-MLR models for cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin based on optimal wavelengths
| Indices | Model type | Para | Calibration set | Prediction set | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| RMSEC (%) |
| RMSEP (%) | |||
| Cellulose | SPA–PC-MLR | 18 | 0.91 | 2.60 | 0.92 | 2.41 |
| SPA–PLSR | 11 | 0.90 | 2.77 | 0.91 | 2.52 | |
| Hemicellulose | SNV–SPA–PC-MLR | 10 | 0.81 | 1.63 | 0.84 | 1.48 |
| SNV–SPA–PLSR | 8 | 0.79 | 1.69 | 0.80 | 1.63 | |
| Lignose | SPA–PC-MLR | 16 | 0.76 | 1.71 | 0.71 | 1.89 |
| SPA–PLSR | 12 | 0.75 | 1.76 | 0.65 | 2.06 | |
aSimilar model parameters and abbreviations as in Table 2. SPA successive projections algorithm
Fig. 4Performance of best prediction models for determination of biofuel pellet lignocellulose components based on characteristic wavelengths. a SPA–PC-MLR model for cellulose; b SNV–SPA–PC-MLR model for hemicellulose and c SPA–PC-MLR model for lignin
Fig. 5Distribution maps of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin contents in different biofuel pellets. a Original biofuel pellet NIR images; b prediction map of different lignocellulose components. The numbers accompanying each sample represent the respective lignocellulose component content. The three color-scale bars were generated with different cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin contents from small to large, shown in different colors from blue to red