Literature DB >> 29618845

Comparing potential recharge estimates from three Land Surface Models across the Western US.

Rewati Niraula1, Thomas Meixner1, Hoori Ajami2, Matthew Rodell3, David Gochis4, Christopher L Castro1.   

Abstract

Groundwater is a major source of water in the western US. However, there are limited recharge estimates available in this region due to the complexity of recharge processes and the challenge of direct observations. Land surface Models (LSMs) could be a valuable tool for estimating current recharge and projecting changes due to future climate change. In this study, simulations of three LSMs (Noah, Mosaic and VIC) obtained from the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS-2) are used to estimate potential recharge in the western US. Modeled recharge was compared with published recharge estimates for several aquifers in the region. Annual recharge to precipitation ratios across the study basins varied from 0.01-15% for Mosaic, 3.2-42% for Noah, and 6.7-31.8% for VIC simulations. Mosaic consistently underestimates recharge across all basins. Noah captures recharge reasonably well in wetter basins, but overestimates it in drier basins. VIC slightly overestimates recharge in drier basins and slightly underestimates it for wetter basins. While the average annual recharge values vary among the models, the models were consistent in identifying high and low recharge areas in the region. Models agree in seasonality of recharge occurring dominantly during the spring across the region. Overall, our results highlight that LSMs have the potential to capture the spatial and temporal patterns as well as seasonality of recharge at large scales. Therefore, LSMs (specifically VIC and Noah) can be used as a tool for estimating future recharge rates in data limited regions.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 29618845      PMCID: PMC5880210          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hydrol (Amst)        ISSN: 0022-1694            Impact factor:   6.708


  7 in total

1.  Seasonalizing mountain system recharge in semi-arid basins-climate change impacts.

Authors:  Hoori Ajami; Thomas Meixner; Francina Dominguez; James Hogan; Thomas Maddock
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Environmental science. Water in the balance.

Authors:  James S Famiglietti; Matthew Rodell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Evaporation and environment.

Authors:  J L Monteith
Journal:  Symp Soc Exp Biol       Date:  1965

4.  Water balance of global aquifers revealed by groundwater footprint.

Authors:  Tom Gleeson; Yoshihide Wada; Marc F P Bierkens; Ludovicus P H van Beek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The water footprint of humanity.

Authors:  Arjen Y Hoekstra; Mesfin M Mekonnen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Global monthly water scarcity: blue water footprints versus blue water availability.

Authors:  Arjen Y Hoekstra; Mesfin M Mekonnen; Ashok K Chapagain; Ruth E Mathews; Brian D Richter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Groundwater depletion during drought threatens future water security of the Colorado River Basin.

Authors:  Stephanie L Castle; Brian F Thomas; John T Reager; Matthew Rodell; Sean C Swenson; James S Famiglietti
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 4.720

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  How might recharge change under projected climate change in western US?

Authors:  R Niraula; T Meixner; F Dominguez; M Rodell; H Ajami; D Gochis; C Castro
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 5.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.