Literature DB >> 29618787

Prognostic value of serum vascular endothelial growth factor and hematological responses in patients with newly-diagnosed POEMS syndrome.

Hao Zhao1, Hao Cai1, Chen Wang1, Xu-Fei Huang1, Xin-Xin Cao1, Lu Zhang1, Dao-Bin Zhou1, Jian Li2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29618787      PMCID: PMC5884844          DOI: 10.1038/s41408-018-0073-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Cancer J        ISSN: 2044-5385            Impact factor:   11.037


× No keyword cloud information.
Polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy and skin changes (POEMS) syndrome is a rare plasma cell dyscrasia characterized by high serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)[1,2]. Bone marrow plasma cells are the likely source of this angiogenic cytokine, which is responsible for the characteristic symptoms of this disorder, including extra-vascular volume overload, hemagiomata and papilledema. A reduction of VEGF level after treatment usually correlates with symptomatic improvement[3-6]. The main treatment strategy is to target plasma cell clones, and monoclonal protein and VEGF levels are used to monitor disease activity. Hematologic complete response (CR) has proved to be a significant predictor of disease outcome. However, some patients without CR still show reasonable survival rates, suggesting that this group is highly heterogenous and requires better prognostic indicators[7]. VEGF response after treatment showed good prognostic value in a retrospective study of 20 patients. Those achieving a normal serum VEGF value after treatment attained prolonged relapse-free survival[8]. However, previous studies were limited by patient number and follow-up time, and lacked OS outcome and comparison with hematologic response. A total of 476 patients were newly-diagnosed POEMS syndrome and treated at our institute between January 2000 and October 2016. Of these, 190 patients (39.9%, and baseline clinical characteristics were not significantly different from all patients), who had both baseline and post-treatment serum M protein and VEGF data, and whose post-treatment serum samples were collected for half a year since the treatment began, were enrolled in the present study. All patients had been followed for at least 6 months and had elevated baseline serum VEGF levels ( > 600 pg/mL). All patients met the diagnostic criteria proposed by Dispenzieri[2]. Primary therapies included autologous stem cell transplantation (77 patients), melphalan-based therapy (21 patients) and novel agent-based (thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib) therapy (92 patients). The median length of follow-up was 32 months (range, 6–179 months). Detailed clinical features and laboratory information were collected at the time of diagnosis, as described previously[9]. (Online Supplementary Table 1) Serum VEGF was measured with a human Quantikine ELISA Kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA)[10]. All patients provided informed consent, and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The upper limit of the normal serum VEGF range was 600 pg/mL in our institute, as previously described[10]. The complete response of VEGF (CR) was a normalization of serum VEGF levels. A VEGF partial response (PR) was a reduction of > 50% (baseline must ≥ 1200 pg/mL, 3% patients were between 600 and 1200 pg/mL at baseline). Others were considered as VEGF non-response (NR) patients. Hematologic response included CR (a confirmed negative immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) test and for patients with only light-chain secreting clone also undetectable light chain with serum and urine samples) and no CR (did not meet the criteria for a complete response). Analyses were performed with SPSS 23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Pearson χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test were used to ascertain differences between categorical variables. Relationships between baseline factors and VEGF response was compared using a logistic multivariate regression model. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were calculated from the start of treatment. Progression was defined as the recurrence or deterioration of clinical symptoms. OS was defined as the time from transplantation to death from any cause. Survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with a log-rank test. Risk factors were analyzed utilizing Cox multivariate models, and the threshold for statistical significance was set at p = 0.10. Variates which met criteria in univariate analysis, or factors reported prognostic previously were included in multivariate models. Data with p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. There were 17 deaths during follow-up, and other 18 patients had disease progressions. The 3-year PFS was 81.7% and the 3-year OS was 92.8%. Eighty patients (42.1%) achieved CR, and the remaining patients (57.9%) had no CR. The median time from diagnosis to complete hematologic response was 10 months (range, 1–179 months). If CR was achieved, patients had superior progression-free (p = 0.016) and OS rates (p = 0.001) compared with patients with no CR. (Online Supplementary Figure 1) In CR and non-CR patients, the estimated 3-year PFS was 90.1% and 74.9%, while the 3-year OS were 100.0% and 87.1%, respectively. The median value of baseline VEGF was 4 764 pg/mL (range, 660–14 328 pg/mL). The mean number of serum VEGF tests carried on any individual patient was 4, and the median interval between each measurement was 7 months. The median time from diagnosis to best VEGF response was 6 months (range, 1–125 months). A total of 112 (58.9%) patients achieved CR after treatment. Fifty-three patients (27.9%) attained PR and the remaining 25 patients (13.2%) had NR. According to logistic multivariate analysis, patients with lymphoadenopathy (odds ratio [OR], 0.41; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.20–0.84, p = 0.014) and IgA type monoclonal protein (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22–0.93; p = 0.032) were less likely to achieve CR. These clinical variables, may not be specific but are known to reflect disease burden, and imply that patients with heavy disease are still somehow refractory to modern treatment. Patients with CR showed better PFS compared with PR patients (p = 0.030). However, PR patients had no significant difference compared with NR patients in terms of PFS (p = 0.054). NR group included patients with VEGF 600-1200 pg/mL at baseline. The estimated 3-year PFS rates were 87.7%, 79.9%, and 54.8% in CR, PR and NR patients, respectively. Patients with CR also had superior OS compared to PR patients (p = 0.004), as did PR patients compared with NR patients (p = 0.035). The estimated 3-year OS in CR, PR and NR patients were 97.4%, 95.1% and 62.8%, respectively. (Online supplementary Figure 2) According to Cox multivariate analysis, the group with CR had superior PFS (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.19–0.77; p = 0.008) and OS (HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03–0.44; p = 0.001), independent of baseline factors reported previously. (Online supplementary Table 2 & 3) Next, we compared hematologic and VEGF response by showing the hematologic response distribution in each VEGF response group and vice versa. The proportion of hematologic complete response was similar to VEGF response depth, with 62 (55.3%), 17 (32.1%) and 1 (4.0%) patients attaining CR in CR, PR and NR groups, respectively. Almost all patients but one case with CR attained CR/PR. Nearly half of the patients (45.5%) with no CR had CR. (Fig. 1) These results suggest that monoclonal plasma cells are still the base of VEGF production but may not be the direct origin. In accordance with this clinical finding, Wang et al. suggested that bone marrow monoclonal plasma cells secret interleukin-6 to promote the proliferation of polyclonal plasma cells and consequent VEGF production in a paracrine circuit[11]. Therefore, targeting plasma cells is the first step in the inhibition of VEGF secretion, however, whether the treatment depth of VEGF inhibition is sufficient for long-term benefit remains unknown.
Fig. 1

Composition of hematologic and VEGF response groups: (a) Hematologic response composition in different VEGF response groups, (b) VEGF response composition in different hematologic response groups

Composition of hematologic and VEGF response groups: (a) Hematologic response composition in different VEGF response groups, (b) VEGF response composition in different hematologic response groups We combined PR and NR into a non-CR group to dichotomize VEGF response and combine it with CR to produce a more well-rounded model for prognostic prediction. Patients attained either CR or CR were combined into one group in the Kaplan–Meier survival curve. This group of patients had similar PFS (p = 0.932) and OS (p = 0.064) compared to patients achieving both CR and CR, and showed clearly better progression-free (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.002) than patients with neither CR nor CR. (Fig. 2) As mortality is usually caused by organ dysfunction, the normalization of VEGF is supposed to prevent organ damage arising from increased vascular permeability and angiogenesis, which will translate into a long-term benefit. It may be considered that either the complete eradication of plasma cells or the inhibition of VEGF production can derive clinical benefits.
Fig. 2

Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to hematologic and VEGF response: (a) Progression-free survival curve according to hematologic and VEGF response, (b) Overall survival curve according to hematologic and VEGF response

Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to hematologic and VEGF response: (a) Progression-free survival curve according to hematologic and VEGF response, (b) Overall survival curve according to hematologic and VEGF response In summary, we demonstrated the prognostic value of VEGF response alone, as well as combined with hematologic response, in POEMS patients, not only re-affirming the importance of regularly monitoring VEGF in routine practice, but also supporting its use as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials. Supplementary Figure 2 Supplementary Table 1 Supplementary Table 2 Supplementary Table 3 Supplementary Figure 1
  11 in total

1.  The utility of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor levels in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with POEMS syndrome.

Authors:  Anita D'Souza; Suzanne R Hayman; Francis Buadi; Michelle Mauermann; Martha Q Lacy; Morie A Gertz; Robert A Kyle; Shaji Kumar; Philip R Greipp; John A Lust; Stephen J Russell; Steven Zeldenrust; David Dingli; Thomas E Witzig; S Vincent Rajkumar; Angela Dispenzieri
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Growth factors in POEMS syndrome: evidence for a marked increase in circulating vascular endothelial growth factor.

Authors:  M Soubrier; J J Dubost; A F Serre; J M Ristori; B Sauvezie; P Cathebras; J C Piette; A Chapman; F J Authier; R K Gherardi
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1997-04

3.  Markedly elevated serum total N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen is a novel marker for the diagnosis and follow up of patients with POEMS syndrome.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Ying-Lei Zhou; Hao Cai; Xin-Qi Cheng; Wei Zhang; Wen-Ying Kang; Xu-Zhen Qin; Ming-Hui Duan; Hui-Juan Han; Xin-Xin Cao; Dao-Bin Zhou; Jian Li
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Combination of melphalan and dexamethasone for patients with newly diagnosed POEMS syndrome.

Authors:  Jian Li; Wei Zhang; Li Jiao; Ming-Hui Duan; Hong-Zhi Guan; Wei-Guo Zhu; Zhuang Tian; Dao-Bin Zhou
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Remarkable expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in bone marrow plasma cells of patients with POEMS syndrome.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Xu-Fei Huang; Qian-Qian Cai; Xin-Xin Cao; Hao Cai; Daobin Zhou; Jian Li
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.156

6.  Long-term outcome of patients with POEMS syndrome: An update of the Mayo Clinic experience.

Authors:  Taxiarchis V Kourelis; Francis K Buadi; Shaji K Kumar; Morie A Gertz; Martha Q Lacy; David Dingli; Ronald S Go; Prashant Kapoor; John A Lust; Suzanne R Hayman; Yi Hwa; S Vincent Rajkumar; Steven R Zeldenrust; Stephen J Russell; Yi Lin; Nelson Leung; Robert A Kyle; Wilson I Gonsalves; Angela Dispenzieri
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 10.047

7.  Overproduction of vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor is causative in Crow-Fukase (POEMS) syndrome.

Authors:  O Watanabe; I Maruyama; K Arimura; I Kitajima; H Arimura; M Hanatani; K Matsuo; T Arisato; M Osame
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 8.  New advances in the diagnosis and treatment of POEMS syndrome.

Authors:  Jian Li; Dao-bin Zhou
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 9.  POEMS syndrome: 2017 Update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.

Authors:  Angela Dispenzieri
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 10.047

10.  Vascular endothelial growth factor as a predictive marker for POEMS syndrome treatment response: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  S Misawa; Y Sato; K Katayama; H Hanaoka; S Sawai; M Beppu; F Nomura; K Shibuya; Y Sekiguchi; Y Iwai; K Watanabe; H Amino; C Ohwada; M Takeuchi; E Sakaida; C Nakaseko; S Kuwabara
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  5 in total

1.  Ischemic stroke in patients with POEMS syndrome.

Authors:  Jun Feng; Xue-Min Gao; Hao Zhao; Tian-Hua He; Cong-Li Zhang; Kai-Ni Shen; Lu Zhang; Xin-Xin Cao; Ming Qian; Dao-Bin Zhou; Jian Li
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-07-28

2.  Reliability of optic disc edema area in estimating the severity of papilledema in patients with POEMS syndrome.

Authors:  Ling-Shan Liu; Xiao Zhang; Hao Zhao; Xue-Min Gao; Dao-Bin Zhou; Rong-Ping Dai; Jian Li
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.123

3.  VWF/ADAMTS13 ratio as a potential biomarker for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroaki Takaya; Tadashi Namisaki; Mitsuteru Kitade; Kosuke Kaji; Keisuke Nakanishi; Yuki Tsuji; Naotaka Shimozato; Kei Moriya; Kenichiro Seki; Yasuhiko Sawada; Soichiro Saikawa; Shinya Sato; Hideto Kawaratani; Takemi Akahane; Ryuichi Noguchi; Masanori Matsumoto; Hitoshi Yoshiji
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  Not the final diagnosis: from Addison's disease to POEMS syndrome: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Xiaoxi Xie; Rao Li; Yongxia Lu; Xuan Li; Pu Kuang; Chunhui Wang; Nanwei Tong; Qingguo Lü
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  POEMS Syndrome: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Deepthi Kanuganti; Venkata Sundarachary Nagarjunakonda; Pranathi Bandarupalli; Vamsi Krishna Gorijala; Venkata Lakshman Sai Ram Konagalla; Praveen Kowtha
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.