| Literature DB >> 29618330 |
Ghislain Donald Njambe Priso1,2, Abel Lissom1,2, Loveline N Ngu1,3, Nadesh N Nji1, Jules Colince Tchadji1,2, Thibau Flaurant Tchouangueu1,4, Georgia E Ambada1,2, Carole Stéphanie Sake Ngane1,5,3, Brigitte Laure Dafeu1,2, Larissa Djukouo1,3, Inès Nyebe1,5, Suzanne Magagoum1,2, Apeh Alfred Ngoh1,6, Ouambo Fotso Herve1,7, Rosario Garcia8, Anna Gutiérrez8, Arinze S Okoli9, Charles O Esimone10, Flobert Njiokou2, Chae Gyu Park11, Alain Bopda Waffo12,13, Godwin W Nchinda14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In West and Central Africa areas of endemic Loa loa infections overlap with regions of high prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infections. Because individuals in this region are exposed to filarial parasites from birth, most HIV-1 infected individuals invariably also have a history of filarial parasite infection. Since HIV-1 infection both depletes immune system and maintains it in perpetual inflammation, this can hamper Loa loa filarial parasite mediated immune modulation, leading to enhanced loaisis.Entities:
Keywords: African eye worm; HIV-1; Loa loa; Loaisis; Microfilaraemia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29618330 PMCID: PMC5885382 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-018-3072-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Study population characteristics
| Variable | HIV−/MF− ( | HIV−/MF+ (n = 25) | HIV+/MF− (n = 25) | HIV+/MF+ (n = 25) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male and Female | Male and Female | Male | Female | Male | Female |
| Participants (%) | 8 (32) 17 (68) | 11 (44) 14 (56) | 10 (40) | 15 (60) | 9 (36) | 16 (64) |
| Median Age (IQR) | 34 (21-41) | 49.50 (45.25-55.25) | 34 (32-43.50) | 37 (27-46) | 38 (28-46) | 35.5 (28.75-45) |
| Mf count (MF/ml) Median | N/A | 1800 (10-4800) | N/A | 986.7 (1-3200) | ||
| Median CD4 counts (cells/mm3) | N/A | N/A | 499 (IQR 310.5-886.8) | 367.5 (IQR 157.8-460.8) * | ||
| Median Viral load (Log10 copies/ml) | N/A | N/A | 3.05 (IQR 1.76-3.85) | 5.04 (IQR 4.530-5.5) * | ||
*P < 0.05, N/A = Not Applicable, IQR = interquartile range, ns = not significant, MF+ = microfilaria positive
Fig. 2Plasma levels of Filariasis composite antigen specific IgM in Loa loa microfilaraemia positive and negative ARV naïve HIV-1 infected people compared to seronegative people. As shown in (a) & (b) loa loa microfilaraemia results in significantly (P < 0.001) higher plasma levels of IgM in both HIV-1 negative and positive individuals (compare HIV−/MF+ with HIV+/MF+). In (c) a comparative statistically analysis is made between the four groups with respect to plasma levels of their Filariasis composite antigen specific IgM. In (c) a slight but insignificant reduction (P < 0.115) is observed in plasma levels of antigen specific IgM in Loa loa microfilaraemic ARV naïve HIV infected people. Statistical analysis was done with prism graph path 6.0, unpaired t test, Mann-Whitney-U tests and Kruskal-Wallis test
Fig. 3Plasma levels of Filariasis composite antigen specific IgE in Loa loa microfilaraemia positive and negative ARV naïve HIV-1 infected people compared to seronegative people. As shown in (a) & (b) Loa loa microfilaraemia results in significantly (P < 0.001) higher plasma levels of antigen specific IgE exclusively in ARV naïve HIV-1 infection (compare HIV−/MF+ with HIV+/MF+). In (c) a comparative statistically analysis is made between the four groups with respect to plasma levels of their Filariasis composite antigen specific IgE. In (c) a significantly higher (P < 0.0001) plasma levels of antigen specific IgE is observed exclusively in Loa loa microfilaraemic ARV naïve HIV infected people. Statistical analysis was done with prism graph path 6.0, unpaired t test, Mann-Whitney-U test and Kruskal-Wallis test
Fig. 4Plasma levels of Filariasis composite antigen specific IgG in Loa loa microfilaraemia positive and negative ARV naïve HIV-1 infected people compared to seronegative people. As shown in (a) & (b) Loa loa microfilaraemia results in significantly (P < 0.001) higher plasma levels of antigen specific IgG exclusively in HIV-1 negative individuals (compare HIV-/MF- with HIV-/MF+). In (c) a comparative statistically analysis is made between the four groups with respect to plasma levels of their Filariasis composite antigen specific IgG. Statistical analysis was done with prism graph path 6.0, unpaired t test Mann-Whitney-U tests and Kruskal-Wallis test
Fig. 5Plasma levels of Filariasis composite antigen specific IgG1 and IgG2 in Loa loa microfilaraemia positive and negative ARV naïve HIV-1 infected people compared to seronegative people. As shown in (a, b&c) Loa loa microfilaraemia results to significantly (P < 0.001) higher plasma levels of antigen specific IgG1 in both HIV-1 negative and positive individuals (compare HIV-/MF- with HIV-/MF+). Similarly in (D, E &F) Loa loa microfilaraemia results to significantly (P < 0.001) higher plasma levels of antigen specific IgG2 in both HIV-1 negative and positive individuals (compare HIV−/MF− with HIV−/MF+). Statistical analysis was done with prism graph path 6.0, unpaired t test, Mann-Whitney-U tests and KruskalKruskal-Wallis test
Fig. 6Plasma levels of Filariasis composite antigen specific IgG3 and IgG4 in Loa loa microfilaraemia positive and negative ARV naïve HIV-1 infected people compared to seronegative people. As shown in (a) Loa loa microfilaraemia results to significantly (P < 0.0001) elevated plasma levels of antigen specific IgG3 in HIV-1 negative people on the one hand and a significant reduction (P < 0.0001) of antigen specific IgG3 in HIV-1 positive individuals on the other hand. Similarly in (e) Loa loa microfilaraemia results to significantly (P < 0.0001) higher plasma levels of antigen specific IgG4 in HIV-1 negative individuals in contrast to a significant reduction (P < 0.001) in HIV-1 positive individuals (compare HIV-/MF- with HIV-/MF+). Here the effect of Loa loa microfilaraemic HIV-1 infection was a significant reduction in plasma levels of filariasis composite antigen specific IgG3 (P < 0.0001) and IgG4 (P < 0.001). Statistical analysis was done with prism graph path 6.0, unpaired t test, Mann-Whitney-U tests and Kruskal-Wallis test