Literature DB >> 29618186

Predictors of abnormal brain computed tomography findings in patients with acute altered mental status in the emergency department.

Somi Shin1, Hui Jai Lee1, Jongwhan Shin1, Sejong Lee1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Brain computed tomography (CT) is commonly performed to diagnose acute altered mental status (AMS), a critically important symptom in many serious diseases. However, negative CT results are common, which result in unnecessary CT use. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the clinical factors associated with positive CT findings.
METHODS: Patients with acute AMS selected from an emergency department-based registry were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with non-traumatic and noncommunicable diseases on initial presentation and with Glasgow Comal Scale scores of <15 were included in the study.
RESULTS: Among the 367 brain CT results of patients with AMS during the study period, 146 (39.8%) were positive. In a multivariate analysis, the presence of focal neurologic deficit (odds ratio [OR], 132.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 37.8 to 464.6), C-reactive protein level <2 mg/dL (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 10.6), and Glasgow Comal Scale score <9 (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.8) were significantly associated with positive brain CT results.
CONCLUSION: The presence of focal neurologic deficit, initial Glasgow Comal Scale score of <9, and initial C-reactive protein levels of <2 mg/dL can facilitate the selection of brain CT to diagnose patients with acute AMS in the emergency department.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Risk factors; Tomography, X-Ray computed; Unconsciousness

Year:  2018        PMID: 29618186      PMCID: PMC5891739          DOI: 10.15441/ceem.16.163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med        ISSN: 2383-4625


INTRODUCTION

Altered mental status (AMS) is one of the most common chief complaints reported in 4% to 10% of emergency department (ED) patients [1-3]. A wide range of clinical conditions can cause acute AMS, either direct central nervous system (CNS) pathologies such as stroke, seizure, and encephalitis or non-CNS-origin such as sepsis, metabolic imbalance, cardiogenic shock, and intoxication. Moreover, history taking in patients with AMS is, due to their condition, problematic. Thus, determining the exact etiology in patients with AMS is challenging for emergency physicians [1,3]. Brain computed tomography (CT), the primary diagnostic tool to identify intracranial pathologies, has been recommended for AMS [1,3,4]. Unfortunately, brain CT has some limitations when used to diagnose non-intracranial pathology-related AMS [2,5,6]. Studies evaluating the brain CT of patients with AMS without trauma were limited, as most previous studies investigated its effectiveness in patients with traumatic brain injuries. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of brain CT in patients with non-traumatic AMS and, consequently, determine the clinical characteristics predictive of positive brain CT findings in these patients.

METHODS

Study setting

This study was conducted at a single urban academic hospital with an annual ED census of 55,000. A retrospective ED-based registry of AMS was reviewed from April to December 2014. Nontrauma patients who had Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of ≤14 and presented to the ED with noncommunicable disease were enrolled in this study. Those who had previous neurologic deficit (modified Rankin Scale of ≥2), uncomplicated ethanol ingestion, cardiac arrest, aged <18 years, or recovered from mental illness at the time of the initial ED evaluation were excluded. Basic patient characteristics such as age, sex, medical history and previous medications, initial vital signs, neurologic findings, initial laboratory test results, brain CT findings, and final diagnoses were collected. One senior resident (third or fourth year) or faculty of emergency medicine performed full neurologic exams in the patients to determine any cranial nerve abnormality, motor weakness, or cerebellar dysfunction. Only brain CT results conducted in the ED were included for evaluation. Brain CT findings, formal reports, and final diagnoses were reviewed by a faculty of emergency medicine. “Positive CT finding” was defined as the presence of abnormal findings suggestive of acute AMS. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the study hospital (16-2015-3), and written informed consents were waived.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R ver. 3.3.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Categorical variables were recorded as frequency with the corresponding percentage and compared using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. Continuous variables were expressed as the mean± standard deviation, and Student t-tests were performed. Multivariate logistic models were performed using the forward selection approach, and the results were recorded as adjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Conditional Inference Tree Analysis was performed to generate a decision tree to predict positive brain CT results using the R package “Party” ver. 1.0-25 [7,8]. All statistical tests were two-tailed at 0.05 level of significance.

RESULTS

A total of 508 patients treated during the study period met the eligibility criteria and were enrolled in the registry. Among them, 367 (72.2%) patients had undergone brain CT in the ED. All patients with a focal neurologic deficit underwent brain CT, except one who underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging. Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of the patients.
Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of patients with acute mental changes

CharacteristicsBrain CT
P-value
Done (n = 367)Not done (n = 141)
Age (yr)66.32 ± 15.2763.27 ± 18.210.079
Male195 (52.0)66 (46.8)
Current-smoker71 (19.3)17 (16.3)0.317
Frequent alcohol drinking[a)]35 (9.5)8 (8.2)0.273
Glasgow Coma Scale8.45 ± 3.379.47 ± 3.500.002
Mental status0.006
 Confusion0 (0)1 (0.7)
 Lethargy223 (60.8)104 (73.8)
 Stupor66 (18.0)15 (10.6)
 Semicoma42 (11.4)6 (4.3)
 Coma36 (9.8)15 (10.6)
Underlying conditions
 Hypertension166 (45.2)64 (45.4)0.981
 Diabetes mellitus110 (30.0)59 (41.8)0.015
 Malignancy45 (12.3)22 (15.6)0.342
 Chronic liver disease35 (9.5)15 (10.6)0.709
 Chronic kidney disease26 (7.1)13 (9.2)0.418
 Cerebrovascular disease92 (25.1)23 (16.3)0.029
 Parkinson’s disease8 (2.2)4 (2.8)0.746
 Dementia42 (11.4)16 (11.3)> 0.990
Medication
 Psychotropic39 (10.6)24 (17.0)0.050
 Anticonvulsant21 (5.7)12 (8.51)0.270
 Cardiovascular177 (48.2)68 (48.2)0.861
 Opioid6 (1.6)5 (3.5)0.192
 Medications for chronic neurologic disorder25 (6.8)9 (6.8)0.892
Initial vital signs
 SBP (mmHg)111.67 ± 63.7893.72 ± 61.370.004
 DBP (mmHg)62.90 ± 34.7654.67 ± 3.950.016
 Heart rate (/min)88.58 ± 23.9791.96 ± 22.140.214
 Respiratory rate (/min)16.68 ± 8.3915.66 ± 10.370.299
 Body temperature (°C)36.55 ± 1.0336.51 ± 1.040.106
Laboratory results
 WBC (103/μL)11.34 ± 8.4311.79 ± 10.340.707
 Hemoglobin (g/dL)12.76 ± 2.6212.23 ± 2.730.045
 Sodium (mM/L)137.3 ± 6.18135.9 ± 7.430.031
 Potassium (mM/L)4.10 ± 0.844.25 ± 1.090.150
 BUN (mg/dL)25.96 ± 21.2626.97 ± 20.460.629
 Creatinine (mg/dL)1.82 ± 7.651.58 ± 1.650.717
 Glucose (mg/dL)174.74 ± 127.03170.97 ± 151.200.778
 AST (IU/L)67.82 ± 170.7982.89 ± 269.830.454
 ALT (IU/L)31.55 ± 71.7336.05 ± 79.170.539
 Total bilirubin (mg/dL)1.48 ± 2.241.54 ± 2.390.781
 Albumin (g/dL)3.83 ± 2.133.60 ± 0.630.212
 Creatine kinase (U/L)353.02 ± 772.33347.09 ± 704.580.945
 C-reactive protein (mg/dL)3.21 ± 6.864.55 ± 8.530.098
Neurologic exam
 Focal neurologic deficit[b)]90 (26.3)1 (0.7)< 0.001
 Cranial nerve abnormality49 (13.4)1 (0.7)< 0.001
 Extremity abnormality78 (21.3)1 (0.7)< 0.001
 Cerebellar abnormality1 (0.3)0 (0)> 0.990

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

CT, computed tomography; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; WBC, white blood cell; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase.

>4 days per week.

Cranial nerve, extremity, and cerebellar abnormality.

A total of 146 patients had positive CT findings: 81 (55.5%) had intracranial hemorrhage, 54 (37.0%) infarction, 10 (6.8%) tumor, and 1 (0.7%) brain swelling. The most common cause was cerebrovascular etiology (122, 83.6%) (Table 2). Table 3 shows the clinical parameters according to brain CT results.
Table 2.

Etiologies of acute altered mental status in each group

EtiologyCT negativeCT positive
Cerebrovascular5 (2.3)122 (83.6)
CNS infection4 (1.8)2 (1.4)
CNS tumor1 (0.5)5 (3.4)
Seizure/postictal confusion29 (13.1)6 (4.1)
Other CNS pathology4 (1.8)1 (0.7)
Sepsis27 (12.2)5 (3.4)
Hepatic encephalopathy24 (10.9)1 (0.7)
Hypoglycemia18 (8.1)0 (0)
Other metabolic derangement32 (14.5)2 (1.4)
Cardiovascular10 (4.5)0 (0)
Hypoxia6 (2.7)1 (0.7)
Drug intoxication43 (19.5)1 (0.7)
Psychiatric6 (2.7)0 (0)
Environmental injury10 (4.5)0 (0)
Unknown2 (0.9)0 (0)

Values are presented as number (%).

CT, computed tomography; CNS, central nervous system.

Table 3.

Clinical characteristics and univariate analysis according to the result of brain CT

CharacteristicsCT findings
P-value
Positive (n=146)Negative (n=221)
Age (yr)65.93 ± 15.4866.58 ± 15.160.689
Male79 (54.1)116 (52.5)0.761
Current-smoker30 (20.5)41 (18.6)
Frequent alcohol drinking[a)]18 (12.3)17 (7.7)0.198
GCS7.82 ± 3.318.86 ± 3.170.003
Initial GCS < 984 (57.5)99 (44.8)0.017
Mental status0.032
 Confusion0 (0)0 (0)
 Lethargy77 (52.8)146 (66.1)
 Stupor30 (20.5)36 (16.3)
 Semicoma18 (12.3)24 (10.9)
 Coma21 (14.4)15 (6.8)
Underlying conditions
 Hypertension66 (45.2)100 (45.2)0.924
 Diabetes mellitus30 (20.5)80 (36.1)0.002
 Malignancy15 (10.3)30 (13.6)0.002
 Chronic liver disease6 (4.1)29 (13.1)0.004
 Chronic kidney disease5 (3.4)21 (9.5)0.029
 Cerebrovascular disease43 (29.5)49 (22.2)0.096
 Parkinson’s disease1 (0.7)7 (3.2)0.115
 Dementia8 (5.5)34 (15.4)0.004
Medication
 Psychotropic7 (4.8)32 (14.5)0.004
 Anticonvulsant5 (3.4)16 (7.2)0.136
 Cardiovascular71 (48.6)106 (48.0)0.699
 Opioid2 (1.4)4 (1.8)0.766
 Medications for chronic neurologic disorder6 (4.1)19 (8.6)0.104
Initial vital sign
 SBP (mmHg)117.02 ± 70.20108.14 ± 59.060.208
 DBP (mmHg)64.90 ± 37.7461.58 ± 32.660.385
 Heart rate (/min)83.40 ± 23.0091.83 ± 24.040.003
 Respiratory rate (/min)16.03 ± 8.5617.10 ± 8.270.235
 Body temperature (°C)36.40 ± 0.8336.64 ± 1.130.060
Lab results
 WBC (103/μL)11.90 ± 8.8210.96 ± 8.170.337
 Hemoglobin (g/dL)13.30 ± 2.4812.41 ± 2.660.607
 Sodium (mM/L)137.78 ± 4.38136.9 ± 7.120.187
 Potassium (mM/L)3.90 ± 0.714.24 ± 0.78< 0.001
 BUN (mg/dL)22.78 ± 18.8428.07 ± 22.510.020
 Creatinine (mg/dL)1.24 ± 1.432.19 ± 9.780.248
 Glucose (mg/dL)169.29 ± 56.11178.35 ± 157.390.434
 AST (IU/L)44.62 ± 51.6483.14 ± 214.880.011
 ALT (IU/L)25.09 ± 45.2135.77 ± 84.570.118
 Total bilirubin (mg/dL)1.23 ± 1.001.64 ± 2.760.047
 Albumin (g/dL)4.14 ± 3.283.62 ± 0.620.021
 Creatine kinase (U/L)296.61 ± 599.37389.28 ± 865.010.294
 CRP (mg/dL)1.40 ± 3.414.41 ± 8.17< 0.001
 C-reactive protein < 2 mg/dL125 (85.6)151 (68.3)< 0.001
Neurologic exam
 Focal neurologic deficit87 (59.6)3 (1.4)< 0.001
 Cranial nerve abnormality47 (32.2)2 (0.9)< 0.001
 Extremity abnormality76 (52.1)2 (0.9)< 0.001
 Cerebellar abnormality1 (0.7)0 (0)0.398

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

CT, computed tomography; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; WBC, white blood cell; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase.

>4 days per week.

In the multivariate analysis, the presence of focal neurologic deficit (OR, 132.6; 95% CI, 37.8 to 464.6), C-reactive protein (CRP) of <2 mg/dL (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 10.6), and GCS score of <9 (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.8) were significantly associated with positive brain CT results (Table 4).
Table 4.

Multivariate analysis results

VariableAdjusted odds ratio95% Confidence intervalP-value
Focal neurologic deficit132.637.8–464.6< 0.001
Glasgow Coma Scale < 92.41.2–4.80.016
C-reactive protein < 23.91.4–10.60.008
To generate the decision tree in the Conditional Inference Tree Analysis, the presence of focal neurologic deficit was the primary predictive factor (96.7%) of positive CT result. In patients without focal neurologic deficit, 39 (37.5%) with positive CT scans had GCS scores of <9 and CRP levels of <2 mg/dL. Sixteen patients (11.7%) showed GCS scores of ≥9, and 4 (11.1%) had GCS scores of <9 and CRP levels of ≥2 mg/dL. The accuracy of the decision tree was 0.8311 (95% CI, 0.7887 to 0.868; P<0.001) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.

Conditional inference tree for positive computed tomography (CT) findings. A total of 90 patients had focal neurologic deficit, among whom 87 (96.7%) had positive CT findings (node 2). One hundred and four patients had Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of <9 and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels of <2 mg/dL; among them, 39 (37.5%) had positive CT findings (node 7). One hundred and thirty-seven patients had GCS scores of ≥9; among them, 16 (11.7%) had positive CT findings (node 4). Among the 36 patients with GCS scores of <9 and CRP levels of ≥2 mg/dL, 4 (11.1%) had positive CT findings (node 6).

DISCUSSION

Acute AMS caused by intracranial pathology usually requires immediate diagnosis and intervention. Brain CT is regarded as one of the essential approaches to manage AMS [4]. With technical advancements over the past decade, utilization of brain CT in the ED has continuously increased [9]. However, increased rates of CT use can expose patients to excessive levels of radiation and society to higher medical costs. One retrospective study that reviewed brain CT utilization in a single ED found that the rate of brain CT use had increased by 60% over a 7-year period; however, the diagnostic yield for intracranial hemorrhage had remained constant at approximately 3% [10]. Therefore, several guidelines for brain CT have been developed, but are mostly relevant to traumatic brain injuries [11-13]. Moreover, studies on patients with AMS using brain CT were limited. Hardy and Brennan [2] evaluated the brain CT of elderly patients (aged >70 years) with acute confusion, noting that positive findings were detected in only 14%. Partel et al. [6] evaluated the brain CT data of poisoned patients with AMS, determining that no cases had abnormal CT findings and that brain CT was performed at a higher rate for these patients nonetheless. Leong et al. [5] evaluated 382 brain CT scans performed on patients with AMS over the course of 11 months at a single ED. They reported that diastolic blood pressure of >80 mmHg, GCS score of <15, focal weakness, increasing plantar response, dilated pupils, and use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications were factors associated with abnormal CT findings. In the present study, the following patient characteristics differed: first, the GCS scores in all patients were <15, and second, trauma patients were excluded. Furthermore, we evaluated laboratory test results that are crucially important for differential diagnosis in the ED, which were not included by Leong et al. [5]. In our analysis, the presence of focal neurologic deficit was a significant factor suggesting positive brain CT findings (Table 4 and Fig. 1). Only three (3.3%) patients with focal neurologic deficit had negative CT findings: two had an acute ischemic lesion on brain magnetic resonance imaging and one hypotension-caused AMS. Only one patient had cerebellar dysfunction, who needed a cerebellar function test requiring cooperation that is typically not possible in patients with AMS, which might affect the results. Furthermore, changes in the mental status are relatively infrequent in patients with posterior circulation stroke [14]. Based on our results, initial GCS scores of <9 and CRP levels of <2 mg/dL were also correlated with positive brain CT findings (Table 4 and Fig. 1). Traditionally, brain imaging studies have been recommended for patients with low GCS scores, a protocol supported by our results [4,11,15]. Neurologic evaluation findings in patients with lower GCS scores (<9) might be more limited and less accurate than those in patients with higher GCS scores, simply due to poor cooperation [3]. Neurologic evaluation may be easier and more accurate in patients with higher GCS scores. CRP is a pentraxin released by the liver during the phase response of acute inflammatory reaction. Although every inflammatory condition can increase the CRP level, its high elevation is thought to be suggestive of infection. Patients with severe sepsis and septic shock had higher CRP levels than those with noninfectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome [16]. In our study, lower CRP levels (<2 mg/dL) were associated with positive CT results (Table 3 and Fig. 1). Most patients with positive CT results (93.2%) have CNS pathology (cerebrovascular, CNS infection, CNS tumor, seizure/postictal confusion, and other CNS pathologies) (Table 2). CRP level can be also elevated in many CNS pathologies, such as ischemic stroke and brain hemorrhage. However, in these conditions, increased CRP levels occur several hours after the brain injury; therefore, routine evaluation of CPR levels is not recommended as an initial assessment, and these can affect our results [17,18]. Based on the Conditional Inference Tree Analysis results, we suggest the following protocol: if the patient has focal neurologic deficit, brain CT should be performed (CT positivity rate, 96.7%); if the patient has no focal neurologic deficit and if the initial GCS score is <9 and CRP is <2 mg/dL, brain CT can be helpful (CT positivity rate, 37.5%); and if GCS score is ≥9 or <9 and CRP ≥2 mg/dL, brain CT might not be helpful (CT positivity rate, 11.7% and 11.1%, respectively) (Fig. 1). For the generalization of these results, an external validation study should be conducted. More than 70% of patients included in the present study underwent brain CT, which is higher compared to relevant previous reports. This could have been influenced by the facts that cases of alcohol ingestion or of AMS in previously neurologically impaired patients were excluded from our study. The rate of positive findings on brain CT was 39.8%, which is not much lower than that of the previous studies (14%, 45%) [2,5]. Regional and cultural factors, which should be noted here, can also affect the pattern of brain CT utilization. The present study has several limitations. First, its design is retrospective. Patients without brain CT were excluded from the analysis, although if they had been included and had undergone brain CT, abnormal lesions might have also been found, which could have affected the results. The neurologic status of these patients changes easily, even in those with only minor medical conditions [1,3]. Moreover, in the retrospective setting, degrees of AMS are often difficult to understand, and, therefore, evaluate. Finally, the study lacks an ordering protocol for brain CT; instead, CT scans were conducted based on the attending physician’s decision, which could have resulted in a selection bias. Large-scale prospective multicenter studies will overcome these limitations. In conclusion, positive findings were detected in 39.8% of patients with acute AMS who underwent brain CT in the ED. Initial GCS scores of <9, CRP levels of <2 mg/dL, and presence of focal neurologic deficit were significantly associated with positive brain CT findings.
  17 in total

1.  ED utilization of computed tomography in a poisoned population.

Authors:  Manish M Patel; Ben T Tsutaoka; Shireen Banerji; Paul D Blanc; Kent R Olson
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.469

2.  Identifying risk factors for an abnormal computed tomographic scan of the head among patients with altered mental status in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Lim Beng Leong; Kenneth Heng Wei Jian; Alicia Vasu; Eillyne Seow
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.799

3.  Comparison of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria in patients with minor head injury.

Authors:  Ian G Stiell; Catherine M Clement; Brian H Rowe; Michael J Schull; Robert Brison; Daniel Cass; Mary A Eisenhauer; R Douglas McKnight; Glen Bandiera; Brian Holroyd; Jacques S Lee; Jonathan Dreyer; James R Worthington; Mark Reardon; Gary Greenberg; Howard Lesiuk; Iain MacPhail; George A Wells
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Computed tomography use in the adult emergency department of an academic urban hospital from 2001 to 2007.

Authors:  Jarone Lee; Jonathan Kirschner; Sapna Pawa; Dan E Wiener; David H Newman; Kaushal Shah
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 5.  Evaluation of C-reactive protein measurement for assessing the risk and prognosis in ischemic stroke: a statement for health care professionals from the CRP Pooling Project members.

Authors:  Mario Di Napoli; Markus Schwaninger; Roberto Cappelli; Elena Ceccarelli; Giacinto Di Gianfilippo; Cristina Donati; Hedley C A Emsley; Sandro Forconi; Stephen J Hopkins; Luca Masotti; Keith W Muir; Anna Paciucci; Francesca Papa; Sabina Roncacci; Dirk Sander; Kerstin Sander; Craig J Smith; Alessandro Stefanini; Daniela Weber
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Performance of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for predicting any traumatic intracranial injury on computed tomography in a United States Level I trauma center.

Authors:  Linda Papa; Ian G Stiell; Catherine M Clement; Artur Pawlowicz; Andrew Wolfram; Carolina Braga; Sameer Draviam; George A Wells
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Head computed tomography utilization and intracranial hemorrhage rates.

Authors:  Jarone Lee; C Scott Evans; Neil Singh; Jonathan Kirschner; Daniel Runde; David Newman; Dan Wiener; Josh Quaas; Kaushal Shah
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-12-19

8.  Altered mental status: evaluation and etiology in the ED.

Authors:  William Kanich; William J Brady; J Stephen Huff; Andrew D Perron; Christopher Holstege; George Lindbeck; C Thomas Carter
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.469

9.  Computerized tomography of the brain for elderly patients presenting to the emergency department with acute confusion.

Authors:  James Edward Hardy; Nicholas Brennan
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  C-reactive protein in intracerebral hemorrhage: time course, tissue localization, and prognosis.

Authors:  Mario Di Napoli; Daniel Agustin Godoy; Veronica Campi; Luca Masotti; Craig J Smith; Adrian R Parry Jones; Stephen J Hopkins; Mark Slevin; Francesca Papa; Laurentiu Mogoanta; Daniel Pirici; Aurel Popa Wagner
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  2 in total

1.  Brain Imaging Use and Findings in COVID-19: A Single Academic Center Experience in the Epicenter of Disease in the United States.

Authors:  A Radmanesh; E Raz; E Zan; A Derman; M Kaminetzky
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Is brain imaging necessary for febrile elderly patients with altered mental status? A retrospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Sungwoo Choi; Hyun Na; Sangun Nah; Hayeong Kang; Sangsoo Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.