Literature DB >> 2961812

Studies on the capacity of intact cells and purified Ia from different B cell sources to function in antigen presentation to T cells.

J Krieger1, D M Jenis, R W Chesnut, H M Grey.   

Abstract

In this study we have evaluated some of the potential mechanisms that may be responsible for the inefficiency with which resting B cells function as antigen-presenting cells (APC) and the mechanism by which that function is enhanced following treatment of B cells with neuraminidase. One mechanism that has been previously suggested is that glycosylation differences in Ia associated with different APC accounts for the different functional capacities of resting and activated B cells. It has been postulated that removal of sialic acid from resting B cell Ia results in a correction of its antigen-presenting defect. To study this possibility, we have used purified I-Ad from different B cell sources in a planar membrane system to present an immunogenic peptide of chicken ovalbumin (Ova) to an I-Ad-restricted Ova-specific T cell hybridoma. It was found that I-Ad isolated from resting B cells, B cell stimulatory factor 1 (BSF-1) or lipopolysaccharide and dextran sulfate-stimulated B cells, or A20 B lymphoma cells were all equivalent in their antigen-presenting capacity. Furthermore, removal of sialic acid from Ia did not enhance its capacity to serve as a restriction element. The mechanism by which neuraminidase treatment enhances B cell APC function was further investigated by studying the effect of sialic acid removal on a primary mixed leukocyte reaction (MLR). When allogeneic fixed B cells were used as stimulator cells it was found that neither resting nor BSF-1-stimulated B cells could induce a MLR. Following neuraminidase treatment, BSF-1-treated B cells, but not resting B cells, were capable of stimulating a MLR. However, a MLR was also stimulated by allogeneic BSF-1-treated B cells when the responder T cells, rather than the stimulator cells, were treated with neuraminidase. An enhancing effect similar to that obtained by neuraminidase treatment could be obtained by the addition of 2% polyethylene glycol to the MLR culture. These data suggest that the inability of BSF-1-stimulated cells to function efficiently as accessory cells in stimulating a primary MLR is due to their relative inability to interact physically with T cells, a deficiency that is overcome by neuraminidase treatment of either T or B cell populations or by the addition of polyethylene glycol to the culture. Although the reason for the failure of these same treatments to restore the accessory cell function of resting B cells is not known, some possible mechanisms are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2961812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  10 in total

Review 1.  Antigen presenting cells.

Authors:  D L Hamilos
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.829

2.  T helper cell subsets require the expression of distinct costimulatory signals by antigen-presenting cells.

Authors:  C T Weaver; C M Hawrylowicz; E R Unanue
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Where catabolism meets signalling: neuraminidase 1 as a modulator of cell receptors.

Authors:  Alexey V Pshezhetsky; Aleksander Hinek
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.916

Review 4.  Roles for major histocompatibility complex glycosylation in immune function.

Authors:  Sean O Ryan; Brian A Cobb
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 9.623

5.  Regulation of phagocytosis in macrophages by neuraminidase 1.

Authors:  Volkan Seyrantepe; Alexandre Iannello; Feng Liang; Evgeny Kanshin; Preethi Jayanth; Suzanne Samarani; Myron R Szewczuk; Ali Ahmad; Alexey V Pshezhetsky
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Augmentation of antigen-specific lymphoproliferative responses in vitro by biological response modifiers.

Authors:  T D de Gruijl; J J Moore; E de Vries; B M von Blomberg-van der Flier; J C Fonk; R J Scheper
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Detection of autoreactive CD4 T cells using major histocompatibility complex class II dextramers.

Authors:  Chandirasegaran Massilamany; Bijaya Upadhyaya; Arunakumar Gangaplara; Charles Kuszynski; Jay Reddy
Journal:  BMC Immunol       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.615

8.  The relationship between antigen concentration, antigen internalization, and antigenic complexes: modeling insights into antigen processing and presentation.

Authors:  D F Singer; J J Linderman
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 9.  Targeting B Cells and Plasma Cells in Autoimmune Diseases.

Authors:  Katharina Hofmann; Ann-Katrin Clauder; Rudolf Armin Manz
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Sialic Acid Ligands of CD28 Suppress Costimulation of T Cells.

Authors:  Landon J Edgar; Andrew J Thompson; Vincent F Vartabedian; Chika Kikuchi; Jordan L Woehl; John R Teijaro; James C Paulson
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 14.553

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.