Motivation: Software pipelines have become almost standardized tools for microbiome analysis. Currently many pipelines are available, often sharing some of the same algorithms as stages. This is largely because each pipeline has its own source language and file formats, making it typically more economical to reinvent the wheel than to learn and interface to an existing package. We present Plugin-Based Microbiome Analysis (PluMA), which addresses this problem by providing a lightweight back end that can be infinitely extended using dynamically loaded plugin extensions. These can be written in one of many compiled or scripting languages. With PluMA and its online plugin pool, algorithm designers can easily plug-and-play existing pipeline stages with no knowledge of their underlying implementation, allowing them to efficiently test a new algorithm alongside these stages or combine them in a new and creative way. Results: We demonstrate the usefulness of PluMA through an example pipeline (P-M16S) that expands an obesity study involving gut microbiome samples from the mouse, by integrating multiple plugins using a variety of source languages and file formats, and producing new results. Availability and implementation: Links to github repositories for the PluMA source code and P-M16S, in addition to the plugin pool are available from the Bioinformatics Research Group (BioRG) at: http://biorg.cis.fiu.edu/pluma.
Motivation: Software pipelines have become almost standardized tools for microbiome analysis. Currently many pipelines are available, often sharing some of the same algorithms as stages. This is largely because each pipeline has its own source language and file formats, making it typically more economical to reinvent the wheel than to learn and interface to an existing package. We present Plugin-Based Microbiome Analysis (PluMA), which addresses this problem by providing a lightweight back end that can be infinitely extended using dynamically loaded plugin extensions. These can be written in one of many compiled or scripting languages. With PluMA and its online plugin pool, algorithm designers can easily plug-and-play existing pipeline stages with no knowledge of their underlying implementation, allowing them to efficiently test a new algorithm alongside these stages or combine them in a new and creative way. Results: We demonstrate the usefulness of PluMA through an example pipeline (P-M16S) that expands an obesity study involving gut microbiome samples from the mouse, by integrating multiple plugins using a variety of source languages and file formats, and producing new results. Availability and implementation: Links to github repositories for the PluMA source code and P-M16S, in addition to the plugin pool are available from the Bioinformatics Research Group (BioRG) at: http://biorg.cis.fiu.edu/pluma.
Authors: Paul Shannon; Andrew Markiel; Owen Ozier; Nitin S Baliga; Jonathan T Wang; Daniel Ramage; Nada Amin; Benno Schwikowski; Trey Ideker Journal: Genome Res Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Daniel H Huson; Suparna Mitra; Hans-Joachim Ruscheweyh; Nico Weber; Stephan C Schuster Journal: Genome Res Date: 2011-06-20 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Elizabeth K Costello; Christian L Lauber; Micah Hamady; Noah Fierer; Jeffrey I Gordon; Rob Knight Journal: Science Date: 2009-11-05 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Katherine Wolstencroft; Robert Haines; Donal Fellows; Alan Williams; David Withers; Stuart Owen; Stian Soiland-Reyes; Ian Dunlop; Aleksandra Nenadic; Paul Fisher; Jiten Bhagat; Khalid Belhajjame; Finn Bacall; Alex Hardisty; Abraham Nieva de la Hidalga; Maria P Balcazar Vargas; Shoaib Sufi; Carole Goble Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Yan Y Lam; Connie W Y Ha; Craig R Campbell; Andrew J Mitchell; Anuwat Dinudom; Jan Oscarsson; David I Cook; Nicholas H Hunt; Ian D Caterson; Andrew J Holmes; Len H Storlien Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rosana B R Ferreira; Navkiran Gill; Benjamin P Willing; L Caetano M Antunes; Shannon L Russell; Matthew A Croxen; B Brett Finlay Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 3.240