Yechiam Ostchega1, Guangyu Zhang2, Jeffery P Hughes1, Tatiana Nwankwo1. 1. Division of Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA. 2. Division of Research and Methodology, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Factors and trends associated with hypertension control (BP < 130/80 mm Hg) and mean blood pressure (BP) among hypertensive adults (BP ≥1 30/80 mm Hg or medicated for hypertension). METHOD: Data on 22,911 hypertensive US adults from the 1999-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. RESULTS: For men, hypertension control prevalence increased from 8.6% in 1999-2000 to 16.2% in 2003-2004 (P < 0.001), and continued the increasing trend afterwards to 23.2% in 2011-2012 (P < 0.001) and then plateaued. For women, hypertension control prevalence increased from 1999-2000 to 2009-2010 (10.8-26.3%, P < 0.001) and then plateaued. For men with hypertension, systolic BP decreased from 1999-2000 to 2011-2012 (135.7-132.8 mm Hg, P < 0.001) and then increased to 135.3 mm Hg in 2015-2016 (P < 0.001). For women with hypertension, systolic BP decreased from 1999-2000 to 2009-2010 (139.7-131.9 mm Hg; P < 0.001) and then increased to 134.4 mm Hg in 2015-2016 (P = 0.003). Diastolic BP decreased from 1999-2000 to 2015-2016 (men: 79.1-75.5 mm Hg and women: 76.4-73.7 mm Hg, P < 0.001 for both). In 2011-2016, hypertension control was 22.0% for men and 25.2% for women. The adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) of hypertension control were lower for non-Hispanic black men and women (PR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.61-0.86; PR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.70-0.99, respectively; non-Hispanic white (NHW) as reference), Hispanic and non-Hispanic Asian men (PR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.54-0.92; PR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.39-0.86; respectively; NHW as reference). CONCLUSION: Hypertension control significantly increased from 1999-2000 to 2011-2012 (men) and 2009-2010 (women) and then plateaued. About a quarter of US adults with hypertension were controlled in 2011-2016.
BACKGROUND: Factors and trends associated with hypertension control (BP < 130/80 mm Hg) and mean blood pressure (BP) among hypertensive adults (BP ≥1 30/80 mm Hg or medicated for hypertension). METHOD: Data on 22,911 hypertensive US adults from the 1999-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. RESULTS: For men, hypertension control prevalence increased from 8.6% in 1999-2000 to 16.2% in 2003-2004 (P < 0.001), and continued the increasing trend afterwards to 23.2% in 2011-2012 (P < 0.001) and then plateaued. For women, hypertension control prevalence increased from 1999-2000 to 2009-2010 (10.8-26.3%, P < 0.001) and then plateaued. For men with hypertension, systolic BP decreased from 1999-2000 to 2011-2012 (135.7-132.8 mm Hg, P < 0.001) and then increased to 135.3 mm Hg in 2015-2016 (P < 0.001). For women with hypertension, systolic BP decreased from 1999-2000 to 2009-2010 (139.7-131.9 mm Hg; P < 0.001) and then increased to 134.4 mm Hg in 2015-2016 (P = 0.003). Diastolic BP decreased from 1999-2000 to 2015-2016 (men: 79.1-75.5 mm Hg and women: 76.4-73.7 mm Hg, P < 0.001 for both). In 2011-2016, hypertension control was 22.0% for men and 25.2% for women. The adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) of hypertension control were lower for non-Hispanic black men and women (PR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.61-0.86; PR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.70-0.99, respectively; non-Hispanic white (NHW) as reference), Hispanic and non-Hispanic Asian men (PR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.54-0.92; PR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.39-0.86; respectively; NHW as reference). CONCLUSION:Hypertension control significantly increased from 1999-2000 to 2011-2012 (men) and 2009-2010 (women) and then plateaued. About a quarter of US adults with hypertension were controlled in 2011-2016.
Authors: Everlyne G Ogugu; Sheryl L Catz; Janice F Bell; Christiana Drake; Julie T Bidwell; James E Gangwisch Journal: Integr Blood Press Control Date: 2022-05-25
Authors: Emily M Bucholz; Neel M Butala; Norrina B Allen; Andrew E Moran; Sarah D de Ferranti Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 6.604
Authors: Alka M Kanaya; Ann W Hsing; Sela V Panapasa; Namratha R Kandula; Maria Rosario G Araneta; Daichi Shimbo; Paul Wang; Scarlett L Gomez; Jinkook Lee; K M Venkat Narayan; Marjorie K L Mala Mau; Sonali Bose; Martha L Daviglus; Frank B Hu; Nadia Islam; Chandra L Jackson; Merle Kataoka-Yahiro; John S K Kauwe; Simin Liu; Grace X Ma; Tung Nguyen; Latha Palaniappan; V Wendy Setiawan; Chau Trinh-Shevrin; Janice Y Tsoh; Dhananjay Vaidya; Barbara Vickrey; Thomas J Wang; Nathan D Wong; Sean Coady; Yuling Hong Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 51.598
Authors: Gulam Muhammed Al Kibria; Reese Crispen; Muhammad Abdul Baker Chowdhury; Nadimpali Rao; Christina Stennett Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 2.877