Literature DB >> 29617882

Protect us from poor-quality medical research.

.   

Abstract

Much of the published medical research is apparently flawed, cannot be replicated and/or has limited or no utility. This article presents an overview of the current landscape of biomedical research, identifies problems associated with common study designs and considers potential solutions. Randomized clinical trials, observational studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses are discussed in terms of their inherent limitations and potential ways of improving their conduct, analysis and reporting. The current emphasis on statistical significance needs to be replaced by sound design, transparency and willingness to share data with a clear commitment towards improving the quality and utility of clinical research.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29617882     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  5 in total

1.  Sudomotor function testing by electrochemical skin conductance: does it really measure sudomotor function?

Authors:  Sharika Rajan; Marta Campagnolo; Brian Callaghan; Christopher H Gibbons
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.435

2.  Not many shoulders of giants to stand on these days.

Authors:  David F Albertini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Preventive psychiatry: a blueprint for improving the mental health of young people.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Christoph U Correll; Celso Arango; Michael Berk; Vikram Patel; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 79.683

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence for COVID-19 Detection in Medical Imaging-Diagnostic Measures and Wasting-A Systematic Umbrella Review.

Authors:  Paweł Jemioło; Dawid Storman; Patryk Orzechowski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Are interventions in reproductive medicine assessed for plausible and clinically relevant effects? A systematic review of power and precision in trials and meta-analyses.

Authors:  K Stocking; J Wilkinson; S Lensen; D R Brison; S A Roberts; A Vail
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.918

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.