A hallmark of advanced prostate cancer (PC) is the concomitant loss of PTEN and p53 function. To selectively eliminate such cells, we screened cytotoxic compounds on Pten-/-;Trp53-/- fibroblasts and their Pten-WT reference. Highly selective killing of Pten-null cells can be achieved by deguelin, a natural insecticide. Deguelin eliminates Pten-deficient cells through inhibition of mitochondrial complex I (CI). Five hundred-fold higher drug doses are needed to obtain the same killing of Pten-WT cells, even though deguelin blocks their electron transport chain equally well. Selectivity arises because mitochondria of Pten-null cells consume ATP through complex V, instead of producing it. The resulting glucose dependency can be exploited to selectively kill Pten-null cells with clinically relevant CI inhibitors, especially if they are lipophilic. In vivo, deguelin suppressed disease in our genetically engineered mouse model for metastatic PC. Our data thus introduce a vulnerability for highly selective targeting of incurable PC with inhibitors of CI.
A hallmark of advanced prostate cancer (PC) is the concomitant loss of PTEN and p53 function. To selectively eliminate such cells, we screened cytotoxic compounds on Pten-/-;Trp53-/- fibroblasts and their Pten-WT reference. Highly selective killing of Pten-null cells can be achieved by deguelin, a natural insecticide. Deguelin eliminates Pten-deficient cells through inhibition of mitochondrial complex I (CI). Five hundred-fold higher drug doses are needed to obtain the same killing of Pten-WT cells, even though deguelin blocks their electron transport chain equally well. Selectivity arises because mitochondria of Pten-null cells consume ATP through complex V, instead of producing it. The resulting glucose dependency can be exploited to selectively kill Pten-null cells with clinically relevant CI inhibitors, especially if they are lipophilic. In vivo, deguelin suppressed disease in our genetically engineered mouse model for metastatic PC. Our data thus introduce a vulnerability for highly selective targeting of incurable PC with inhibitors of CI.
Today, we understand cancer as a stepwise progression in malignant phenotype of cells, combined with non-cell-autonomous failures to halt progression of disease. The past decade has seen huge progress in the genetic characterization of deadly cancers (reviewed in Garraway and Lander, 2013). Major emerging principles are the high complexity and subclonal diversification (branching) found within one as well as between metastatic sites (for examples, see Gundem et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2014). Another emerging principle is that both bulk tumor analysis and single-cell resolution studies point to a single cell of origin, whose descendants periodically overcome distinct bottlenecks for progression. One such bottleneck is the overcoming of the p53-induced cellular senescence program. This is triggered by the complete loss of PTEN, as identified in pre-clinical cancer models and human cancer cells (Alimonti et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2005; Ding et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2006). In agreement, whole-genome analysis of human prostate cancer shows that co-deletion of PTEN and TP53 is associated with highly advanced and metastatic disease (Chen et al., 2011; Robinson et al., 2015; Taylor et al., 2010). On the basis of these reports, 20% co-alteration is seen in the 17% of patients who have distant and locally advanced PC. This would suggest that of the 3 million American men with PC, roughly 100,000 carry cancers with co-mutation of these genes.We have recently validated the lethal and metastatic nature of this genotype by showing causality in a pre-clinical PC model called RapidCaP. This genetically engineered mouse (GEM) model is highly prone to develop metastasis and resistance to hormone deprivation, the standard of care in advanced PC (Cho et al., 2014). This prompted us to screen for drugs against this specific genotype. Importantly, several studies revealed that p53 loss alone led to no signs of prostate disease (Chen et al., 2005; Ding et al., 2011). We thus set out to identify drugs that selectively target genetically engineered cells of the genotype that gives rise to lethal disease (Pten−/−;Trp53−/−) while sparing the cells that show no prostate phenotype (Trp53−/−; see Figure 1A).
Figure 1
Identification of Chemotherapeutics with Efficacy against Pten-Null Genotype
(A) Schematic of chemotherapeutic screen workflow. MEFs were harvested from mice, and cellular genomic DNA was recombined after infection with adenovirus encoding Cre recombinase. Cells were selected (using viral vector-encoded selection markers) to generate pure populations. Chemotherapeutic efficacy of 23 agents (each at three concentrations) was assessed, and effects on the two genotypes were measured via assessment of cell activity, viability, and number (tetrazolium dye-based assay developed by Biolog).
(B) Viability measured over a 24 hr period of Pten-WT and Pten-null cells in the presence of four exemplary drugs. Graphs show data from two biological replicates. Error bars show SD.
(C) Biolog system output for visualization of results from (B).
(D) Top: overview of the 96-well results obtained at four concentrations per drug, with colored bars indicating location of no drug control (blue), rotenone(orange), and deguelin (red). Top right: magnification of highlighted wells. Bottom: post-screen IC50 calculation identifies rotenone and deguelin as hits for specific toxicity in Pten-null MEFs.
(E) Cell viability after deguelin treatment is measured in the Biolog system for each genotype and shows a strong effect in Pten-null but not Pten-WT cells. Graphs show data from two biological replicates. Error bars show SD
RESULTS
Pten-Null Cells Are Selectively Killed by Deguelin and Rotenone
To test for compounds, we used the OmniLog Biolog platform (http://www.biolog.com), which combines drug-coated 96-well plates with a dedicated cell incubator/spectrophotometer for continuous measurement of viability as the system reads accumulation of a tetrazolium-based dye for 24 hr at 15 min intervals. We screened a total of 23 cytotoxic drugs that include known chemotherapy agents and thus obtained viability curves for each cell type at four concentrations per drug. Without drug, Pten-null cells showed a higher dye turnover, consistent with faster growth that we have described previously (Chen et al., 2005; Nowak et al., 2015). First, a qualitative overview of the results showed that several known chemotherapy agents indiscriminately reduced viability of both cell types, as seen with representative concentrations of, for example, the thymidylate synthase inhibitor 5′-fluorouracil (5-FU) and the anthracycline aclarubicin or the microtubule-stabilizing agent docetaxel compared with no treatment (Figure 1B; see also Figure S2F for docetaxel). As shown in Figure 1C, the readout produced by the Biolog system facilitated the comparison of drug effects on the cells by indicating as a green curve segment the amount by which the Pten-null cells are more viable than the wild-type (WT) cells, which are shown as a yellow curve. Evaluating the overview of the drug effects on the two cell types, we found that two compounds selectively reduced activity of Pten-null cells, as indicated by the appearance of a red curve segment, showing the amount by which the Pten-deficient cells showed less viability than their WT counterparts. Quantification of half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for each drug and ranking by the ratio of IC50 in Pten-null to that in Pten-WT cells revealed that none of the chemotherapy agents selectively targeted the faster growing Pten-deficient cells, while the two drugs rotenone and deguelin did (Figure 1D, bottom; see also Experimental Procedures). Curve comparison in Figure 1E shows how deguelin selectively targeted the Pten-null cells.
Deguelin Kills Pten-Null Cells by Inhibition of Mitochondrial Complex I
Rotenone is a potent inhibitor of mitochondrial complex I (CI) that is present in a root extract called cube resin, which has been widely used as potent insecticide and fish poison (Fang and Casida, 1998). Deguelin, another component of this extract, has a similar structure (Figure S1B) and was found to be less toxic than rotenone in mice (Caboni et al., 2004), which is why we selected it for further analysis. Deguelin can be synthesized from rotenone (Anzeveno, 1979), most recently in three steps (Caboni et al., 2004; Figure S1B). To test if deguelin targets Pten-null cells through mitochondrial inhibition, we performed a series of tests. First, we determined the drug’s effect on mitochondrial morphology by MitoTracker staining. Super-resolution confocal microscopy revealed massive mitochondrial fragmentation upon deguelin treatment (Figures 2A and S1C), a hallmark of CI inhibition by rotenone (see, e.g., Barsoum et al., 2006). Quantification showed that deguelin caused the fragmentation in both Pten-WT and null cells (note that microtubule [MT] lengths between the two genotypes were indistinguishable). Next, we tested the effect of deguelin on oxygen consumption rate (OCR). As shown in Figure 2B, deguelin strongly blocked OCR at various concentrations. We then dissected the effect on components of the electron transport chain (ETC) by testing cells after permeabilization and found that deguelin inhibits CI contribution to respiration, but not that of complex II (Figure 2B, complex II). These results showed that deguelin acts on CI. Several recent reports argued that deguelin acts by suppressing a multitude of signaling pathways, including PI 3-kinase/Akt (reviewed in Wang et al., 2013), whereas in contrast, binding studies indicated accumulation in MTs (Garcia et al., 2012). Therefore, we next tested if its inhibition of CI was both essential and sufficient for killing of the Pten-null cells. A hallmark of ETC inhibition is that it can be overcome by glucose, which allows cells to produce ATP through glycolysis. As shown (Figure S2A), raising the glucose concentration from physiological 7 mM to 25 mM, which is often used in tissue culture, caused a reduction of killing by deguelin from 90% to 9%. We next asked if restoration of CI function is sufficient to rescue this killing. To this end we expressed the yeast NDI1 transgene, which can drive electron flux in the ETC (Wheaton et al., 2014) but is insensitive to CI inhibitors, including rotenone (Seo et al., 1998). As shown in Figure 2C, expression of NDI1 rescued respiration in the presence of deguelin close to normal levels, while at the same time NDI1 on its own did not increase OCR in the Pten-null cells. Next we tested the effect on cell killing using propidium iodide as readout. By performing this rescue experiment in galactose, we furthermore enforced the condition that no net ATP production stem from glycolysis. As shown in Figure 2D, yeast NDI1 rescued the viability of deguelin treated Pten-null cells, while NDI1 alone did not increase viability of cells in galactose. When assayed in 25 mM glucose, NDI1 had no effect on cell viability, while cells became resistant to deguelin-mediated killing (consistent with Figure S2A). Note that Figure 2C measures mitochondrial OCR, which reveals CI inhibition and rescue irrespective of glucose levels, whereas Figure 2D measures cell viability, which does respond to glucose levels because of contribution from glycolysis. Taken together, these results showed that inhibition of mitochondrial CI is the necessary and sufficient action of deguelin through which it preferentially kills the Pten-null cells.
Figure 2
Deguelin Kills Pten-Null Cells by Targeting Mitochondrial Complex I
(A) Left: super-resolution imaging (OMX) of mitochondria stained with MitoTracker shows fragmentation induced by deguelin. Scale bars, 10 μm. Right: Quantification of mitochondrial lengths after treatment with deguelin. Note that both cell types respond to deguelin with fragmentation. Error bars show SEM (n = 3); one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons test; *p < 0.0001. See also Figure S1C.
(B) Left: relative OCR by complex I in intact Pten-null MEFs normalized to DMSO-treated control cells. Middle: relative complex I OCR in saponin-permeabilized Pten-null MEFs. Error bars are SD, n = 5 replicates per group; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett multiple comparisons; *p < 0.0001 compared with 0 μM deguelin. Right: relative mitochondrial complex II-driven oxygen consumption rate of saponin-permeabilized Pten-null MEFs in the presence of deguelin or the complex II inhibitor 3-nitropropionic acid (3-NPA) and normalized to DMSO-treated control cells. Error bars are ±SEM (n = 3 independent experiments); one-way ANOVA with Dunnett multiple comparisons; *p < 0.05 compared with 0 μM deguelin.
(C) Relative mitochondrial oxygen consumption rate (OCR) of intact p53/pTen−/− MEFs stably expressing either the empty vector (EV) or the yeast NDI1 gene was measured in the presence of 0.5 μM deguelin using the Seahorse Biosciences XF24 Extracellular Flux Analyzer and normalized to the corresponding untreated cells. Error bars are SEM (n = 3 independent experiments); one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparisons; **p < 0.0001.
(D) Pten-null cells stably expressing either the EV or the yeast NDI1 gene were cultured in media containing 25 mM galactose and treated with or without 0.5 μM deguelin for 24 hr. Error bars are SEM (n = 3 independent experiments); two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparisons; **p < 0.0001.
Complex V Function Is Reversed in Pten-Null Cells
When testing deguelin in Pten-WT cells, we confirmed that it had the same effects as seen in Pten-null cells (Figure S2B): deguelin blocked OCR in both intact and permeabilized cells, and it also inhibited mitochondrial CI, not complex II. Therefore, we next asked how deguelin can preferentially target Pten-deficient cells. Our results suggested that the ETC components downstream of CI, namely, complex III and complex IV, were equally affected in both genotypes. We next tested if complex V, which imports protons back into the matrix to produce ATP (Figure S2C), behaves differently in the two genotypes. As shown (Figure 3A), inhibition of complex V resulted in a 3.5-fold increase of mitochondrial membrane potential of WT cells at high glucose (25 mM). At 7 mM glucose, this increase in membrane potential was still significant, albeit lower, as expected (see Figures 3A and S2D). Thus, we could infer that mitochondria of these cells are generating more or less ATP as a function of glucose concentrations. When testing the Pten-null cells, we also saw increased membrane potential upon complex V inhibition at 25 mM glucose. In contrast, however, membrane potential decreased when complex V was inhibited at 7 mM glucose. This indicated that at physiological glucose, complex V is not producing ATP coupled to proton import but instead is consuming ATP coupled to proton export from the matrix (see Figure 3A, cartoon). Complex V reversal is a known mechanism to preserve mitochondrial membrane potential at the cost of ATP consumption (Martínez-Reyes et al., 2016). We next validated this finding by using carboxyatractyloside (CATR) to examine the role of the adenine nucleotide translocator (ANT). ANT inhibition should prevent ATP/ADP exchange between cytoplasm and matrix and thus is expected to diminish complex V proton pumping activity (see Figure 3A, cartoon). Indeed, CATR treatment selectively reduced membrane potential in the Pten-null cells at 7 mM starting glucose, just like oligomycin did (Figure S2D). In WT cells, in contrast, ANT inhibition by CATR caused increased membrane potential, like oligomycin did. Our results indicate that effectively, the mitochondria of the Pten-deficient cell are turned into ATP consumers, thus generating a high dependence on ATP production through glycolysis.
Figure 3
Complex V Function Is Reversed in Pten-Null Cells
(A) Relative mitochondrial membrane potential of cells grown in 25 or 7 mM glucose and in the presence or absence of the complex V inhibitor oligomycin. Pten-WT cells show increased membrane potential upon oligomycin treatment at physiological glucose. In contrast, Pten-null cells show decreased membrane potential under these conditions, demonstrating reversed proton flow through complex V. Right: schematic of reversed complex V function and its inhibition by oligomycin, resulting in decreased membrane potential because complex V is exporting protons at the cost of ATP consumption. Error bars are SD (n = 8). See also Figures S2D and S2E.
(B) MTT assay for viability upon deguelin treatment as a function of glucose concentration and Pten status. A red line on the x axis indicates physiological glucose range. Error bars are SD (n = 3).
(C) Per cell glucose consumption in Pten-null or WT cells in the presence or absence of 0.5 μM deguelin. Pten-null cells treated with deguelin showed an increased dependence on glucose consumption compared with untreated. Error bars are SD (n = 3).
(D) Pten-null and Pten-WT cells were grown in 7 mM glucose, and kill curves were determined for deguelin and rotenone at 24 and 48 hr post-treatment. Error bars are SD (n = 4).
Deguelin Targets the Glucose/ATP Dependence of Pten-Null Cells
Finally, we sought to test if CI inhibitors kill Pten-deficient cells by exploiting the fact that mitochondrial ATP consumption causes glucose to become limiting. First, we tested deguelin-mediated cell killing over 24 hr as a function of starting glucose concentration in the medium (Figure 3B). This revealed preferential targeting of Pten-null cells in the range of 5–10 mM starting glucose, which roughly represents the physiological diurnal-to-nocturnal range. Most important, the selective effect on Pten-null cells narrows as starting glucose is increased, and the effect is completely lost at 25 mM starting glucose. This was in stark contrast to the clinically relevant chemotherapy agent used in PC, docetaxel: it killed the cells irrespective of Pten status or glucose concentration (Figure S2F). Together, our results suggested that deguelin could accelerate the high need for glucose of Pten-null cells, more than that of the Pten-WT cells, thus leading to selective killing due to faster glucose depletion. To test this hypothesis, we compared medium glucose depletion in both cell types. As shown in Figure 3C, the untreated Pten-null cells depleted more glucose per cell than the Pten-WT over a 20 hr period, as expected. Addition of deguelin, however, led to an increase in glucose consumption in the Pten-null cells, even though deguelin blocked cell proliferation. Overall, we observed a 29-fold difference in per cell glucose consumption when comparing the two genotypes after 20 hr. These results confirmed the hypothesis that selective killing of deguelin occurs because of its shortened time to glucose depletion in the Pten-null cells.
Inhibitor Properties Dictate the Maximal Achievable Window for Selective Killing
Taken together, our data pointed toward a strategy for selective killing the Pten-deficient cells by forcing them into glucose consumption beyond what is available in order to maintain membrane potential. This hypothesis would then imply that maximizing the selective window for killing the Pten-deficient cells is a function of time and drug concentration. We first tested this hypothesis with deguelin. As shown in Figure 3D, a massive window (467-fold difference) of genotype-selective killing is seen at 48 hr post-treatment, not at 24 hr. As seen by the kill curves, the longer exposure results in death of Pten-null cells below 10 nM deguelin concentrations, but not the WT, consistent with the hypothesis. We next tested rotenone and found that although the same principle applied, the optimal window of selective killing was seen at 24 hr instead. This immediately suggested very different ideal administration modes for the two highly related drugs. After 48 hr of rotenone treatment, we observed only a minor genotype-selective window because of effective killing of WT cells. Because no difference between the efficacy of these two drugs on CI inhibition was measured (see also Akatsuka et al., 2016), our results suggested that differences in their transport to the site of action translate into different kinetics for achieving maximal genotype selectivity.We therefore expanded this analysis to a selection of clinically relevant CI inhibitors. As summarized in Figure S3A, we first tested the common anti-diabetic agent metformin. It showed little genotype selectivity over the time frame of 24–72 hr and precipitated at highest concentrations. Because this biguanide compound is positively charged, it is thought to be self-limiting because its uptake into mitochondria depends on membrane potential, which it suppresses (Chandel et al., 2016). Phenformin is a more lipophilic aromatic derivative of metformin (Figure S3A), resulting in ~10 times faster uptake in cells (Sogame et al., 2009), and it possesses different pharmacological properties (reviewed in Pernicova and Korbonits, 2014). Phenformin indeed showed some genotype-selective killing at 24 and 48 hr, which is consistent with the notion that it may still reach target when membrane potential is low, but it only affected less than half of the cells (Figure S3A). The selective kill window was lost by 72 hr, when 100% of both cell genotypes were affected. Next, we tested IACS-010759, a CI inhibitor that was developed recently and is currently in clinical trials for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02882321; see also Baran et al., 2016). IACS-010759 showed optimal genotype selectivity at around 48 hr and affected 100% of the cells at the clinically relevant concentration of 100 nM.Taken together, these results were consistent with the hypothesis that time to glucose depletion acts as a filter that can be used to optimize selective killing of the Pten-null cells. We confirmed this principle in PTEN-WT and mutant human PC cell lines and in RapidCaP derived primary prostate cancer cells (Figure S3B). Furthermore, we learned that changes in drug properties, which are assumed to affect transport to CI, dictate when exactly this filter best separates Pten-null from Pten-normal.
Deguelin Is Well Tolerated and Targets Lethal Prostate Cancer in Mice
Finally, we tested if the strong CI inhibitor deguelin can be used to fight advanced prostate cancer in vivo. First, we tested uptake of the drug in mouse prostate tissue after administration. Using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) to measure deguelin levels, we found that it could be successfully delivered. Tissue exposure in prostate peaked within 1 hr of administration. Partial clearance of deguelin was noted at the 2 hr time point, which then decreased steadily through the end of the experiment (6 hr post-injection). Next, we tested if deguelin hits its functional target in prostate. As shown above using tissue culture (see Figure 2A), CI inhibition by deguelin resulted in fragmentation of mitochondria. When testing mitochondrial morphology in treated prostates, we also found that the extended shape of normal mitochondria in control treated prostate (see Figure 4B, DMSO) was lost in favor of weak stained, fragmented mitochondria in the epithelial cells (Figure 4B, deguelin, and Figure S3C). Figure S3C (deguelin, bottom) in particular revealed the outline of the epithelium and the weak staining of severed MTs by binary black-white enhancement of the mitochondrial Tom20 staining. Our combined analysis thus showed that deguelin (1) reached prostate at a pharmacologically relevant dose and (2) was able to hit its target in prostate epithelium.
Figure 4
Deguelin Can Be Used to Target Lethal Prostate Cancer
(A) LC-MS analysis of deguelin concentration in the prostate at up to 6 hr post-intra-peritoneal (i.p.) injection.
(B) Staining of mitochondrial Tom20 in prostate tissue from deguelin-treated WT animals shows a loss of staining compared with untreated tissue (see also Figure S3C). E denotes location of the prostatic epithelium and L that of the prostatic lumen; see also Figure S3B. Scale bar, 10 μm.
(C) Left: percentage change in bioluminescence luciferase imaging (BLI) of DMSO- or deguelin-treated mice at start and end of the 10 week trial. Middle: waterfall plot for overall disease burden as measured by relative change to starting BLI at 2 and 10 weeks, respectively. Line graph for overall disease burden, measured by relative percentage BLI signal change from start shows significant differences between control and treatment animals. The dosing increase from 0.4 to 4 mg/kg during the 10week period is indicated in gray; see also Figure S3D. Lines show moving averages (period = 3), and asterisks indicate p < 0.05 after linear regression analysis compared with DMSO. Linear regression analysis was performed on the full dataset, not the moving average. Right: deguelin was well tolerated, as judged by minor changes in relative body weight over the 10 week trial period.
(D) Absence of abnormal proliferation, as judged by Ki-67 staining of prostate tissue from deguelin-treated mouse B confirms successful suppression of disease. Scale bars, 30 μm. Quantification shows percentage Ki-67 positive nuclei per gland. Error bars are SEM; unpaired t test (control, n = 8; treated, n = 6).
We next tested the drug in our GEM model for lethal metastatic prostate cancer (PC), termed RapidCaP, which is based on somatic delivery of Cre-lentivirus to few prostate cells (Cho et al., 2014, 2015; Nowak et al., 2015). It is unique for allowing live imaging and therapy of endogenous lethal metastatic PC, triggered by co-deletion of Pten and Trp53, a prominent clinical genotype of lethal human PC (Chen et al., 2011; Robinson et al., 2015; Taylor et al., 2010). As shown in Figure 4C, bioluminescence luciferase imaging (BLI) revealed both primary and secondary disease in pre-treatment animals. Given the previously published toxicity in mice (Caboni et al., 2004), we decided on a dose escalation schedule over a 10 week period (Figure S3D, cartoon), which is comparable with the time required for a therapeutic effect using castration therapy in RapidCaP (Cho et al., 2014). Quantification of weight change, an indicator of animal well-being, showed only 5% maximal weight loss over the 10 week trial period, indicating good tolerability of the drug and its dosing in animals with significant disease burden. BLI monitoring of the overall disease burden as a percentage relative to the starting point revealed the expected increase in the DMSO control animal, but (1) significant reduction in both primary and secondary disease of treated animals and (2) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria (Therasse et al., 2000), stable disease (SD) and partial remission (PR) in the treated animals, compared with progressive disease (PD) in the control. Prostate immunofluorescence-immunohistochemistry (IF-IHC) analysis of Ki-67 revealed no glands with abnormal proliferation upon deguelin treatment (Figure 4D). Furthermore, we performed total thin-section histologic analysis of prostate, sampling approximately every 40th section with histogenic markers. In agreement with the Ki-67 results, lesions were found in DMSO-treated prostate but not in deguelin-treated prostate (Figure S4A). Furthermore, analysis of normal prostate glands confirmed significantly lowered mitochondrial staining upon deguelin treatment, confirming drug function in situ (Figure S4A, Tom20 intensity). Collectively, our results showed that deguelin (1) is well tolerated over an extended period, (2) reaches prostate, (3) hits its target, and (4) can stall or revert progression of advanced PC, in line with early metformin trial results from human metastatic PC patients (Rothermundt et al., 2014).
DISCUSSION
Landmark studies have connected metformin use with reduced cancer mortality (Landman et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2015), spawning a number of clinical trials (as reviewed in Pernicova and Korbonits, 2014). In prostate specifically, a decrease in cancer mortality has been seen, but not in cancer incidence (Margel et al., 2013a, 2013b). This suggests that metformin may preferentially target aggressive PC, which is the subject of ongoing trials (Gillessen et al., 2016). The discovery of CI as the functional target of metformin (Wheaton et al., 2014) has led to development of trials with more effective yet tolerated drugs, such as the IACS-010759 compound used in this study.Our results can contribute to these efforts. They point to a mitochondrial vulnerability, driven by complex V inversion, for achieving highly selective killing of advanced Pten-deficient PC cells. They suggest that maximal selective killing by a given CI inhibitor is dependent on two completely intertwined factors: (1) depletion of tumor cell glucose supplies and (2) the inhibitor’s properties of transport to the target. The first point should be critical in trial design: currently CI inhibitors such as metformin are given to PC patients with or just after meals (i.e., coinciding with highest plasma glucose levels), following the paradigm established for diabetes. Our results instead suggest that greater selectivity might be achieved if drugs are given when blood glucose levels are low. The second point should be critical for drug design: we found that changes in CI inhibitor properties critically affect the optimal time to achieve genotype-selective killing. This effect was most striking when comparing deguelin with rotenone (Figure 3C). Therefore, drug optimization could benefit from the type of time and genotype-selective approach on which our study is based.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Cell Lines and Culture
Creation of Trp53Δ/Δ and Trp53Δ/Δ/PtenΔ/Δ mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) has been described previously (Chen et al., 2005). In brief, MEFs carrying the loxP flanked alleles of the genes were generated and subsequently infected with lentivirus encoding Cre-PURO-IRES-GFP and drug selected. Primary cell lines from RapidCaP mice were generated by collagenase digestion of the prostate. Cells (Trp53Δ/Δ/PtenΔ/Δ) were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) for TdTomato florescence. The pMIRW (MSCV-IRES-RFP-WPRE) vector or empty vector (EV) was generated by removing GFP from the pMIG plasmid (9044; AddGene) and replacing it with RFP-WPRE, PCR amplified from the pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1-RFP plasmid (CD512B-1; System Biosciences). Further methods are described in the Supplemental Information.
Drug Screening
Twenty-three different chemotherapeutic compounds were tested for efficacy against MEFs of both genotypes. Tests were carried out in biological replicate. Screens were performed using OmniLog instruments and Phenotype Microarray technology (both from BioLog). Further methods are described in the Supplemental Information.
Cell Growth Curves and Treatments
MEFs were plated and incubated in DMEM (Mediatech), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin 50 U/mL (Sigma-Aldrich) streptomycin 100 μg/mL (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37°C, 5% CO2, and 100% humidity. Medium was supplemented with DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich) at 0.1% or the indicated concentrations of deguelin (Cayman Chemical) from a stock solution in DMSO. At the indicated time points, cells were fixed and stained with crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich), and absorbance at 590 nm was measured as a readout of cell number.For MTT assays, cell viability assay was performed as per the kit guidelines. Ten thousand cells per well (96-well plate) grown in 7 mM glucose media were treated with the drug or DMSO for 24, 48, or 72 hr. Post-treatment, the cells were washed twice with PBS, and MTT solution was added. After labeling cells with MTT, the absorbance was read at 570 nM. All experiments were performed as triplicates, and the relative cell viability was calculated as a percentage relative to the untreated control.
Mitochondrial Activity Studies
OCRs were measured using the XF24 Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience). Trp53Δ/Δ or Trp53Δ/Δ/PtenΔ/Δ MEFs were seeded onto 24-well Seahorse plates in complete media at a density of 4 × 104 cells/well 2 hr prior to OCR measurements. Detailed methods are described in the Supplemental Information.
Super-Resolution Microscopy and Quantification
Pten-WT or null cells grown on coverslips were stained with MitoTracker Red FM. Post-staining, high-resolution images of live stained or 4% paraformaldehyde-fixed cells were acquired using an OMX 3D structured illumination microscope (Applied Precision; see also Naguib et al., 2015). Quantification of maximal mitochondrial length was performed using ImageJ software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). To measure mitochondrial length, all images were converted to 8-bit files. The straight line selection tool was used to trace the length of mitochondria in the entire cell.
RapidCaP Generation and Pre-clinical Trial
All protocols for mouse experiments were in accordance with institutional guidelines and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). RapidCaP generation is mentioned in the Supplemental Information, and virus preparation and design for recombination of the Trp53 and Pten loci has been described previously (Cho et al., 2014).For pre-clinical trials, mice were treated with deguelin (Sigma-Aldrich) via intra-peritoneal injection on a Monday/Wednesday schedule. The dose of deguelin was escalated over the course of the trial, starting with 0.4 mg/kg and increasing to 1.6 mg/kg in 2 weeks. A dose of 1.2 mg/kg was determined to be effective, and mice were treated at 1.2 mg/kg until week 5 of the trial. The dose was then increased from 1.2 to 4 mg/kg (i.e., 1.6 mg/kg on Monday, 2.0 mg/kg on Wednesday) over the course of the remaining 5 weeks. Further methods for live imaging and deguelin dosing are described in the Supplemental Information.
Prostate Deguelin Extraction and LC Mass Spectrometry
Tissue was homogenized with 300 μL of 1× PBS and sonicated for 60 s. Two hundred microliters of ethyl acetate was added to homogenates, followed by vortexing. Two hundred microliters were then transferred to a new tube and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. The ethyl acetate layer was transferred to a clean 1.7 mL tube and evaporated using a speed vac. Samples were reconstituted with 100 μL of 50% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid, and 5 μL were injected onto the triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer. Further mass spectrometry methods are described in the Supplemental Information.
Statistical Methods
Data were plotted and statistical analysis was performed using Numbers and GraphPad Prism. Plots are composed of the mean of minimally three data points, and error bars represent SD, unless noted otherwise. Statistical significance was determined using t tests, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett multiple comparisons, and two way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparisons. Comparison of the slope of bioluminescence signal change over time in treated and untreated mice was done using a linear regression analysis.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Zhihu Ding; Chang-Jiun Wu; Gerald C Chu; Yonghong Xiao; Dennis Ho; Jingfang Zhang; Samuel R Perry; Emma S Labrot; Xiaoqiu Wu; Rosina Lis; Yujin Hoshida; David Hiller; Baoli Hu; Shan Jiang; Hongwu Zheng; Alexander H Stegh; Kenneth L Scott; Sabina Signoretti; Nabeel Bardeesy; Y Alan Wang; David E Hill; Todd R Golub; Meir J Stampfer; Wing H Wong; Massimo Loda; Lorelei Mucci; Lynda Chin; Ronald A DePinho Journal: Nature Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Zhenbang Chen; Lloyd C Trotman; David Shaffer; Hui-Kuan Lin; Zohar A Dotan; Masaru Niki; Jason A Koutcher; Howard I Scher; Thomas Ludwig; William Gerald; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Pier Paolo Pandolfi Journal: Nature Date: 2005-08-04 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: B B Seo; T Kitajima-Ihara; E K Chan; I E Scheffler; A Matsuno-Yagi; T Yagi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1998-08-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Gijs W D Landman; Nanne Kleefstra; Kornelis J J van Hateren; Klaas H Groenier; Rijk O B Gans; Henk J G Bilo Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Sebastián A Riquelme; Carmen Lozano; Ahmed M Moustafa; Kalle Liimatta; Kira L Tomlinson; Clemente Britto; Sara Khanal; Simren K Gill; Apurva Narechania; Jose M Azcona-Gutiérrez; Emily DiMango; Yolanda Saénz; Paul Planet; Alice Prince Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2019-07-03 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Brandt A Nichols; Nathaniel W Oswald; Elizabeth A McMillan; Kathleen McGlynn; Jingsheng Yan; Min S Kim; Janapriya Saha; Prema L Mallipeddi; Sydnie A LaDuke; Pamela A Villalobos; Jaime Rodriguez-Canales; Ignacio I Wistuba; Bruce A Posner; Anthony J Davis; John D Minna; John B MacMillan; Angelique W Whitehurst Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Injae Chung; Riccardo Serreli; Jason B Cross; M Emilia Di Francesco; Joseph R Marszalek; Judy Hirst Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Ayse Ertay; Huiquan Liu; Dian Liu; Ping Peng; Charlotte Hill; Hua Xiong; David Hancock; Xianglin Yuan; Marcin R Przewloka; Mark Coldwell; Michael Howell; Paul Skipp; Rob M Ewing; Julian Downward; Yihua Wang Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2020-11-21 Impact factor: 8.469
Authors: Jong Hyun Kim; Samuel Ofori; Sean Parkin; Hemendra Vekaria; Patrick G Sullivan; Samuel G Awuah Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 9.825